1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
McCulloh v. Maryland
Background:
Congress created the second National Bank in 1816. Some states opposed it, fearing competition and arguing it was unconstitutional. ___ taxed the Baltimore branch $15,000/year. The bank’s cashier refused to pay, and the case reached the Supreme Court. ___ claimed states could tax businesses within their borders; the bank argued it was “necessary and proper” for Congress to establish.
Constitutional Issue:
Did Congress have the authority to create the bank?
Did ___’s tax unconstitutionally interfere with federal powers?
Ruling/Holding:
Court ruled in favor of the bank.
Congress can incorporate a bank, and ___ cannot tax federal instruments used to execute constitutional powers.
Significance:
Reinforced the Supremacy Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause.
U.S. v. Lopez
Background:
A student brought a g*n to school and was charged under the Federal Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990.
Constitutional Issue:
Does the Act exceed Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause?
Ruling/Holding:
5-4 decision in favor of the student.
Possessing a g*n in a local school is not an economic activity that substantially affects interstate commerce.
If it were, Congress could regulate almost anything, limiting state police powers.
CtSignificance:
Preserved federalism.
Prevented federal encroachment on state powers.
Citizens United v. FEC
Background:
___ wanted to air a negative film about a presidential candidate during the 2008 primaries. The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) prohibited corporations, nonprofits, and unions from making “electioneering communications” close to elections.
Constitutional Issue:
Did BCRA unconstitutionally restrict free speech by corporations and interest groups?
Ruling/Holding:
5-4 decision in favor of ___
Struck down parts of BCRA, including bans on soft money and restrictions on political ad timing.
Political spending by corporations, associations, and unions is protected speech under the First Amendment.
Significance:
Led to a massive increase in political spending.
Engle v. Vitale
Background: Nondenominational prayer approved for public schools; students could opt out.
Constitutional Issue: Does school-led prayer violate the Establishment Clause?
Ruling/Holding: 6-1 for families; government-written prayer in public schools is unconstitutional.
Significance: Limited government-directed prayer in schools.
Wisconsin v. Yoder
Background: Amish parents refused to send kids to public high school due to religious beliefs.
Constitutional Issue: Does the law requiring school attendance violate Free Exercise?
Ruling/Holding: 7-0 for parents; state interest outweighed by free exercise rights.
Significance: Set precedent protecting religious exemptions from education laws.
Schenck v. United States
Background: Socialist leaflets urged draft resistance during WWI; defendants charged under Espionage Act.
Constitutional Issue: Does this violate Free Speech?
Ruling/Holding: Unanimous for the government; speech creating clear and present danger not protected.
Significance: Established “clear and present danger” test; limited speech during wartime.
Tinker v. Des Moines
Background: Students wore armbands protesting Vietnam War; suspended.
Constitutional Issue: Does prohibiting symbolic protest violate Free Speech?
Ruling/Holding: 7-2 for students; armbands are protected speech unless it materially disrupts school.
Significance: Set student free speech precedent.
New York Times v. United States
Background: NYT published Pentagon Papers; government tried to block publication citing national security.
Constitutional Issue: Does prior restraint violate Press rights?
Ruling/Holding: 6-3 for NYT; government must overcome a heavy presumption against prior restraint.
Significance: Strengthened press protections against censorship.
McDonald v. Chicago
Background: Chicago handgun ban challenged after DC v. Heller decision.
Constitutional Issue: Does the 2nd Amendment apply to states via the 14th Amendment?
Ruling/Holding: 5-4 for McDonald; right to bear arms applies to states.
Significance: Incorporated 2nd Amendment to the states.
Gideon v. Wainwright
Background: Defendant denied court-appointed attorney in a felony case.
Constitutional Issue: Does 6th Amendment right to counsel apply to states?
Ruling/Holding: 9-0 for defendant; right to counsel applies via 14th Amendment.
Significance: All criminal defendants must have access to counsel.
Brown v. Board of Education
Background: Segregated public schools denied African American students admission.
Constitutional Issue: Does racial segregation violate Equal Protection Clause?
Ruling/Holding: 9-0 for students; “separate but equal” is inherently unequal.
Significance: Began desegregation of public schools.
Baker v. Carr
Background: Tennessee hadn’t redistricted since 1901; urban districts underrepresented.
Constitutional Issue: Can courts rule on legislative apportionment?
Ruling/Holding: 6-2 for plaintiffs; failure to redistrict violated Equal Protection Clause.
Significance: Led to widespread state legislative reapportionment.
Shaw v. Reno
Background: NC drew oddly shaped “majority-minority” districts.
Constitutional Issue: Is racial gerrymandering a 14th Amendment Equal Protection violation?
Ruling/Holding: 5-4 for residents; race cannot be predominant factor in redistricting.
Significance: Racial gerrymanders may be struck down.
Marbury v. Madison
Background: Appointee confirmed as federal judge; new administration refused to finalize.
Constitutional Issue: Does judicial review exist?
Ruling/Holding: 6-0 for administration; SCOTUS established judicial review, cannot issue writ due to unconstitutional law.
Significance: Supreme Court can declare laws unconstitutional.