1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (1791)
“Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition…”
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19 (1948)
“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
Importance of Free Speech
Personal autonomy and foundation of democracy
Pure Speech
Printed and spoken word
Dangers Posed by Free Speech
Hate speech (protected), violent speech (unprotected), matters related to national security, fighting words (unprotected), more limits on speech that may be directly harmful to children, slander/defamation (unprotected)
Other examples of speech
Symbols, art, gestures, money, expressive action related to symbols
Founder of Two Concepts of Freedom
Isaiah Berlin
Negative Freedom
Government protects your right by staying out of your way — lack of authority
Positive Freedom
Government has to take action to empower you to exercise freedoms — creating equity
Instrumental Arguments for Free Speech
We protect the freedom of speech because it is essential for the government/democratic system, and it helps us achieve it — We protect it because it does something else
Moral Arguments for Free Speech
We protect the freedom of speech because it is good in and of itself
Who Free Speech Was Originally For
Members of the Parliament
Licensing System (1538-1695)
Needed government approval before publishing in the press and limited what people could say
Blackstone’s Commentaries
Tried to summarize what the law means; what it protects and what it doesn’t; argued there is a presumption against prior restraint
Prior Restraint
Government is restraining what you say before you say it
Trial of John Peter Zenger (1735)
Zenger criticized the governor and was charged with criminal seditious libel; jury nullified
Jury Nullification
Defendant should be convicted under the law but the jury didn’t find the law just
Sedition Act of 1798
Made it a federal crime to make any false or malicious statement against the U.S., Congress, or the President with the intent to defame them or to incite the people against them
Patterson v. CO Decision (1907)
accepted Blackstone’s view that free speech/press protects against prior restraints
Patterson v. CO Case (1907)
Patterson published articles that were critical of the state supreme court of Colorado and was found in contempt of court
Espionage and Sedition Act (1919)
Congress made it a federal criminal law that prohibited statements that were viewed as unloyal or unpatriotic
Schenck v. U.S. (March 1919)
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. establishes the Clear and Present Danger Test
Abrams v. U.S. (November 1919)
Holmes dissents using the Marketplace of Ideas Analogy
Whitney v. CA (1927)
Louis Brandeis on history and imminence
Brandenburg v. OH (1969)
Established the Imminent Lawless Action Test