PSYU3330 Measurement & Research

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/32

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

33 Terms

1
New cards

Non-Scientific Methods (5)

TIARE: Tenacity, Intuition, Authority, Rationalism, Empiricism

2
New cards

What would high precision look like on a bell curve?

High precision → Tall bell curve

Low precision → Wider bell curve

3
New cards

Correlational Design

Relationships (strength & direction), describing events, what’s happening?

4
New cards

What would low accuracy look like on a bell curve?

Low accuracy → Darts spread out far from the bull's eye, indicating a bell curve centered away from the target. Same degree of precision (tall, skinny) but pushed to the side.

5
New cards

Experimental Design

Cause and effect, manipulation + control, explaining events, why’s it happening?

6
New cards

What kind of error does a random error lead to?

Low precision

7
New cards

What kind of error does a systematic error lead to?

Low accuracy

8
New cards

Which values are considered “good reliability”?

Values above .8

9
New cards

Correlation values range from

0 (completely unreliable) to 1 (perfectly reliable)

10
New cards

What does higher rxx indicate?

Lower measurement error

11
New cards

Independent Variable

Manipulated/changed to see the effect it has on DV

12
New cards

Dependent Variable

Measured

13
New cards

Describe the two experimental designs

Between-subjects: diff groups assigned to 1 condition each

Within-subjects: same participants do all conditions/levels of IV

14
New cards

What was the main issue with the Nuremberg Code (1947)?

Not legally binding, and leaves decisions up to the researcher

15
New cards

Animal Research Ethics (3)

  1. Replacement: use alternatives to animals where possible

  2. Reduction: use minimum number of animals necessary to get meaningful results

  3. Refinement: minimise suffering as much as possible

16
New cards

Describe the types of interviews (3)

  1. Structured: highly standardised, often w close-ended qs (market research surveys)

  2. Semi-structured: flexible, open-ended qs guided by an interview schedule, allowing for exploration of participant responses

  3. Unstructured: very open, participant-led, no specific qs in mind, aiming to immerse in the participant’s experience

17
New cards

Pillars of Research (4)

POEM

  1. Purpose

  2. Ontology (nature of reality)

  3. Epistemology (position of researcher)

  4. Methodology

18
New cards

Combining qualitative and quantitative methods increases [reliability/validity] of findings

reliability

19
New cards

Describe the 4 mixed methods

  1. qual-QUANT: Qual first (exploratory) → quant (to test findings)

  2. quant-QUAL: Quant first (to identify participants) → qual (for depth)

  3. QUANT-qual: Primary quant → secondary qual follow-up

  4. QUAL-quant: Primary qual → secondary quant follow-up

20
New cards

Evaluation Principles (5)

FURCT

  1. Fit for purpose

  2. Useful

  3. Robust, ethical and culturally appropriate

  4. Credible

  5. Transparent where appropriate

21
New cards

List the process of program evaluation

  1. Establish an Expert Advisory Group

  2. Inputs (resources, staff, funds)

  3. Outputs (participants, activities, workshops)

  4. Outcomes & Impact (short, medium, long-term changes)

  5. Project Manage

  6. Disseminate Findings

22
New cards

Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP)

Assessment of Quality

For internal validity

Random patient assignment, generalisability, benefits vs harms/costs

23
New cards

Cochrane’s Risk of Bias Tool

Assessment of Quality

To assess potential biases in studies (specifically randomised controlled trials)

24
New cards

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Checklist (CONSORT)

Article Reporting Guidelines

25
New cards

NHMRC Evidence Hierarchy

Assessment of strength of evidence for specific interventions

Ranks types of evidence from highest to lowest quality

  • Highest: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

  • Lower: quasi-experimental studies, comparative studies, case series, expert opinion, anecdotal evidence

26
New cards

Hit

Signal present, and observer says “yes” = correctly detects signal

27
New cards

Miss

Signal present, but observer says said “no” = fails to detect signal

28
New cards

False Alarm

No signal (only noise), but observer says “yes” = incorrectly detects signal

29
New cards

Correct Rejection

No signal, observer says “no” = correctly rejects idea of signal

30
New cards

What does a larger d-prime (d’) indicate?

Better sensitivity

31
New cards

What does a Liberal Criterion mean?

Lower threshold (more “yes” responses, leading to more hits but also more false alarms)

32
New cards

What does a Conservative Criterion mean?

Higher threshold (fewer “yes” responses, leading to fewer false alarms but also more misses)

33
New cards

What can Signal Detection Theory be applied to?

  • Lie detection

  • Radiologists inspecting MRI scans for cancerous tumours (distinguishing tumour from dense tissue or imaging artifacts)

  • Digital electronics (distinguishing binary 0s and 1s amidst electrical noise