1/123
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
psychology
the scientific study of behavior and mental processes
Psychology is based on what?
empirical evidence
how do u get empiricial evidence
frm experince or observation
ib psych focuses on 3 diff perspectives of knowledge wat r they?
biological, cogntiive, sociocultural
biological:
based on the physical body and genetics
cognitive:
based on unobservable mental processes
sociocultural
based on the role of others arnd us and our culture
what is reserach?
is a form of systematic investigation to establish facts by using the scientific method
to understand psycholgy wat must u do?
understand how psycholgists gather info abt human behavior
psycholgosy experiemnts never do what?
prove anything
what do psycholgy experiemtn sdo instead?
suggest rls
the data that psychologist collect may be either what or what?
qualitative or quantative
quantative data:
consists of numerical info or simple text da can easily be cnverted to numbers
qualitiative data:
expressed in risch data thru long blocks of text like interviws or field notes
what does it mean when studies us eboth quantaitve and qualitative approaches at the same time
methos triangulation
quanttaive data is generally collected?
quickly and easily
why si quantiaitve data collected easily/quickly
bcuz there is less interpetation by the researcher, there is less potential for bias
what is da goal of quantative research?
to obtain a reprsentative sample to genralize the population
quantative methos typically include what?
large sample sizes and probability based sampling techniques
quantative research is highly focused on what and what?
reliaility and validity
why si quantaive research highly focused on reliabilty and validity?
bcuz of the ease of collecting data leads to constant replication
reliability:
refers to the consistency of psychological research
what r 2 ways to asses reliability
test-retest and interobserver
test retest reliability:
scores r conssitent over time
interobserver relibilty:
different observers give consistent scores
validity
refers to the abiloity of research to measure what its supposed to measure
say 4 types of validity
internal,external,ecological, and population
internal validity
how well the environemtn is controlled to prevent confounds
external valifity
to what extent can data be generlaized outside the study
ecological validity
can the data be trandered to real life situations
populatin validity
do the results generalize to other groups
is a survey a quan or qual
quan
what is a survey
gathering info by asking a fixed set of questons to many ppl
wat is good abt surveys
– The ability to gather a lot of data very quickly
– Generally high in ecological validity as surveys measure real-
life variables
– Low potential for researcher bias
– Surveys can be filled out anonymously, decreasing demand
characteristics
wat is bad abt surveys
Strong potential for participant biases (such as social
desirability and acquiescence)
– Volunteer bias may occur as those who willingly take a survey
may not be “normal”
– Survey construction is sometimes poor and can suffer from
wording effects, leading questions, order effects, etc.
– No assurance that participants are telling the truth or
remembering events correctly
– Can only establish correlation
wat is a correlation?
the measure of a rls between 2 variables
wat do correlational studies do?
isolate 2 variables and perform stat analysis
is correlationals tudies quan or qual
quan
wat is good abt correlational studies?
High ecological validity
– Large sample sizes are used, which aids in generalization
– Quick statistical analysis
wats bad abt correlational studies?
Correlational studies cannot infer causation
– Directionality also cannot be inferred (A might cause B, but B
might also cause A)
– The correlation might be spurious or affected by a third
variable
– Correlational studies only work if the relationship between the
two variables is linear
– Researcher control is limited
is experiemnts quan or qual
quan
an exp occurs when wat?
one variable is changed and everything else is controlled to establish causation
what are three types of variables?
IV,DV,confounding
iv
wat is manipulated by the reasearcher
dv
the outcome varibale or wat is measured
confoduning
anything other than the iv tha moght affect the dv
a tru exp takes place where?
in a lab with meticulous control over confounds
field expeirments:
occur wen a reseacher manipulates variables in the real world
natural expeiremnts
involve nature (rather than a reaseracher) causing the manipulation of the IV
quasi/natural expeiremnts
involve an iv that cant be truly maniplauted
examples of quasi iv’s
gender, race, age, socoeconomic status, etc.
indepdnet samples:
seperate groups that each get a different level of the IV (the groups r typically randomly assgined)
matched pairs
seperate groups that are deliberalty made equal in a key trait
repeated measures
the same gorup gets each level of the IV
wat is the main experimental control?
random assignment into groups
wat is teh goal of random assignment
to make the 2 groups as equal as possible without introducing expeirenter bias
experiemntal group:
receives the treatment
control group
doesnt receive the treatment but is treated jus lik da exp gorup
wats good abt expeiremnts?
True experiments establish causation
– More researcher control than any other method
– Often replicated to check for reliability
wats bad abt exp groups?
Only true experiments establish causation. The other types
cannot due to lack of control over confounds or no true
manipulation of the IV.
– Experiments can be time-consuming and expensive
– True experiments are often artificial and lack ecological validity
– True experiments often utilize convenience sampling, which
hurts their generalization
wat is unavoidable in research?
bias
what differs in quan and qualtivae methods?
the nature of bias
bias in quan research:
is a threat to internal validity
bias in qual research:
is present in both particpant responses and researcher interpretation
wen do demand characteristics occur?
wen the subject alters their behavior as a result of being studied
wat is an example of demand caractetics
hawthorne effect(wen ppl change their behavior bcuz they knw they r being observe dlike basically he was in a assembly line like obseving the workers bcuz he nwate dto figur eout how ot makw the more prodcutive for their boss and they were being super producitve only bcuz they knw he was watching them)
reseracher bias:
occurs wen the expeiremnter places their own beleifs into the research process
placebo effect
a change in behavior resulting from a beelif that da treatment will have an effect
wat is the main tehcnique used to control for placebo effect
the double vlind experiemnt
wat is a double blind experiemnt
both the subject and the reseatcher are unwaware of who is in what group
wat is research prone to and why?
sampling bias bcuz of using narrow groups
popukation:
the entire gorup that u wish to find out abt (usually very large and would be expensive and tiem consuming to test most populations)
sample:
a small gorups of p’s gathered frm the totla number available
wat is the goal of quantiitve research
for the sample to be reprsentative
wat r 2 ways to ensure that a sample is representative
random and stratified sampling
random sampling
gives each peros an equal chance to be selected
stratfied sampling:
deliberately sets up proportions for each subgroup
wat are samples often based on what which hurts the study’s validity?
conveneince
how many geenrlaizations is quan research concerned with?
one
wat is the one geenralization that quan research is concerned with?
statistical generlzation
statistical generalization is hindered by wat?
– Low sample sizes
– Only one gender (androcentric or gynocentric)
– Little cross-culture variability (WEIRD)
– Overreliance on college students
– Volunteer bias
correlation does not equal wat?
causation
correlation:
means that 2 factors r related in some way
causation
means one variable has a direct impact on another
wat is the only way to infer causation?
thru a controlled experiment
experiments do what to confounding factors that might affect the dv?
control them
Some considerations of causality include:
– Is there bidirectional ambiguity? (In other words, could the
other variable actually be the cause?)
– Are there potential confounding variables that might be
influencing the results?
– Is the effect temporary?
– Is there more than one causal event? (For instance, is there
domino causality where there is a chain or sequence of
events?)
perspective:
is a way of looking at things and in research perspective may change the way that results are interpreted
when analyzing research for perspective wat should u do?
look for alternative explnations that might give a different picture of the results
psychologists often begin wit wat?
a general thoery
general theory:
group pf ideas and assumptions
wat is da general theory used to form?
an experimental hypothesis
experimental hypothesis:
a statement about a perceived rls between 2 variables and the direction thereof
what must each variable be given?
an operational defination
operational defination:
a precise way of being measured
wat do poor operational definations lead to?
a lack of construct validity
There are several considerations that are relevant to a
study’s measurement:
– Is the chosen research method appropriate?
– Is the operationalization suitable for the construct that is
being measured?
– Are there any inherent limitations in the instruments being
used for measurement (i.e. brain imaging technologies)?
– Can the measurement be trusted or are there other potential
issues (i.e. a lack of statistical significance)?
There are two major types of change that might be
seen in research:
– Natural developmental change
– Change as the result of an intervention
wat is it important to do in change?
identify potential agents of change