HNGOV 14th Amendment

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/34

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

35 Terms

1
New cards
Due Process of Law
a requirement stated in the 5th and 14th amendments that treatment by state and federal governments in matters of life
2
New cards
Procedural Due Process
the principle that government must respect all
3
New cards
Adversary System
a system of justice in which court trials are essentially contests between accuser and accused that take place before an impartial judge or jury
4
New cards
Inquisitorial System
a trial system in which a judicial official or set of officials act as both prosecutor and judge
5
New cards
Substantive Due Process
judicial interpretation of the due process clauses of the US constitution requiring the content of law to be fair and reasonable
6
New cards
Incorporation/Selective Incorporation
the process through which the US supreme court has applied the due process clause of the 14th amendment to extend the reach of the Bill of Rights to include protection from interference by states
7
New cards
From which document can we trace the establishment of due process?
Anglo-American tradition in chapter 39 of the Magna Carta of 1215
8
New cards
Explain how due process is described in the Magna Carta
King John promised not to imprison
9
New cards
How do we see due process applied in the U.S. Constitution?
  • 5th amendment: limits only the national government.

  • Article I: prohibits congress and the states from passing ex post facto laws

  • 14th amendment imposes the requirement of due process on the states and gives congress the power to enforce the requirement through "appropriate legislation"

10
New cards
Provide an example of procedural due process seen in England
In England
11
New cards
Provide an example of procedural due process seen in the US
due process guarantees apply to both criminal and noncriminal (civil) matters.
12
New cards
What other things does due process guarantee?

the requirement of notice, the opportunity for a fair hearing, the opportunity to present evidence, and the opportunity to appeal an initial decision

13
New cards
Pros of the Adversary System
- In a criminal case where an individual's life
14
New cards
Reasonable doubt
doubt that would cause a prudent person to hesitate before acting on important matters
15
New cards
Cons of Adversary System
can sometimes prioritize winning over finding the truth (injustice)
16
New cards
Pro of Inquisitory System
has courts with the responsibility for full investigation and presentation
17
New cards
Con of Inquisitory System
Gives too much unrestrained power to judges and judicial instituions
18
New cards
Explain the relationship between fundamental rights and substantive due process.
Substantive due process is the legal rule that protects fundamental rights from unfair laws or government actions. Substantive due process means that the constitution usually prohibits some kinds of laws altogether
19
New cards
Explain the details (court case) of how the Supreme Court first began to 'incorporate' constitutional liberties at a state level. Which amendment gives the Court this ability and why?
The court case recognized that in Gitlow v. NY rights of free speech and free press are personal rights to liberty protected by the due process clause. The Gitlow (socialist)
20
New cards
Which parts of the Bill of Rights have yet to be 'incorporated'?
  • 5th Amendment (Grand Jury Clause) : The right to a grand jury in criminal cases

  • 3rd Amendment : Protection against quartering soldiers in homes.

21
New cards
Equality of Opportunity
a right guaranteed by both federal and many state laws avians discrimination in employment
22
New cards
Equality of Condition
equality in all aspects of life
23
New cards
Separate but Equal doctrine
he argument
24
New cards
Strict Scrutiny
The second highest level of scrutiny. A Supreme Court test to see if a law denies equal protection because it does not serve a compelling state interest and is not narrowly tailored to achieve that goal
25
New cards
Intermediate Scrutiny
the middle level of scrutiny applied by courts deciding constitutional issues through judicial review
26
New cards
Judicial Review
Allows the court to determine the constitutionality of laws
27
New cards
Rational Basis
the lowest level of scrutiny applied by the courts deciding constitutional issues through judicial review
28
New cards
What rights are guaranteed by the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment?
  • No state may deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

  • Forbids arbitrary or irrelevant barriers to the full enjoyment of rights by all persons

29
New cards
How has the equal protection clause been interpreted since 1954?
The supreme court now uses at least 3 levels of analysis (level 1: strict scrutiny
30
New cards
How did the Supreme Court justify the doctrine of "separate but equal" in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)?
By saying it was simply a colored people's problem if they interpreted the Louisiana law as unequal. Justice John Marshall Harlan disagreed saying it violated
the equal protection act.
31
New cards
What were the effects of the "separate but equal" doctrine?
State sponsored segregations under Plessy lasted. Almost 60 years and included Asian Americans as well.
32
New cards
What arguments did the Court use in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) to abandon the "separate but equal" doctrine from Plessy?
The court used Justice John Marshall Harlan's dissent in Plessy stating that separated education facilities were "inherently unequal." They also used the fact that the 14th amendment's purpose is to ensure equality
33
New cards
Analysis of Strict Scrutiny
Level 1: Strict Scrutiny- the second highest level of scrutiny used by courts reviewing federal law for constitutional legitimacy. Ex. Laws that deny or dilute the right to vote
34
New cards
Analysis of Intermediate Scrutiny
the middle level of scrutiny applied by courts deciding constitutional issues through judicial review. Governments that disntiguish between groups because of gender or illegitimacy must prove that the laws are "substantially related to an important government purpose."
35
New cards
Analysis of Rational Basis
The lowest level of judicial scrutiny applied to constitutional issues. The burden is on the challenger to prove that the law has no rational connection to a legitimate government interest. If the government can provide any reasonable justification for the law