1/25
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Statistics Canada sorts working-age population (15+) into 3 categories:
Employed: working full-time or part-time at a paid job
Unemployed: not doing paid work and actively looking for a job
Not in the Labor Force: not employed, not unemployed (full-time student, homemaker, retiree)
Labor Force: employed + unemployed
Unemployment Rate
The percentage of the labor force who are unemployed
Unemployment Rate = (Unemployed/Labor Force) x 100
Labor Force Participation Rate
The percentage of the working-age population in the labor force
Labor Force Participation Rate = (Labor Force/Working-Age Population) x 100
Unemployment Rate Misses…
Involuntary Part-Time Workers: part-time workers, would rather have full-time job, but cannot find one
Discouraged Workers: want to work but have given up actively searching for jobs
Labor Underutilization Rule
Unemployment rate including unemployed, involuntary part-time workers, and discouraged workers
Healthy and Unhealthy Types of Unemployment
Frictional
Structural
Seasonal
Cyclical
Frictional Unemployment
Due to normal labor turnover and job search
Healthy; No problem to fix
Structural Unemployment
Due to technological change or international competition making workers skills obsolete
Mismatch between skills workers have and skills new jobs require
Creative destruction — good for economy but not for you personal
Healthy; problem fixing = worker retraining
Seasonal Unemployment
Due to seasonal weather changes
Healthy; no problem
Cyclical Unemployment
Due to business cycle fluctuations in economic activity
Unhealthy; problem fixing = fiscal or monetary
Real GDP = Potential GDP
No output gap
Natural rate of unemployment — full employment; only frictional, structural, seasonal unemployment
Cyclical unemployment = 0
Real GDP < Potential GDP
Recessionary Gap
Unemployment rate above natural rate
On top of frictional, structural, seasonal unemployment, there is cyclical unemployment)
The economy is underperforming and expands
Real GDP > Potential GDP
Inflationary Gap
Unemployment rate below natural rate
Cyclical unemployment = 0
More people are employed than usual
Inflation
Persistent rise in average prices and fall in value of money
Your spend more to get same products/services as before
Your money is worth less
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
Measure of average prices of fixed shopping basket of products/service
CPI = (cost in current year/cost in base year) x 100
Inflation Rate
Annual percentage change in Consumer Price Index (CPI)
Inflation Rate = [(CPI for current year - CPI for previous year)/CPI for previous year] x 100
Core Inflation Rate
Inflation excluding volatile (rapidly changing) categories
Core inflation rate does not fluctuate as much as inflation because it removes volatile categories
Core inflation rate > Inflation rate : Inflation rate of volatile categories < Overall inflation rate
Core inflation rate < Inflation rate : Inflation rate of volatile categories > Overall inflation rate
Inflation is a worry because
Falling value of money
Reduces purchasing power of people with fixed income
Unpredictable prices create risk and discourage business investment
Expectations of inflation can cause inflation
Bank of Canada aims for predictable inflation rates between 1% and 3%
Nominal Interest Rate vs. Realized Real Interest Rate
Nominal Interest Rate: observed interest rate
Dollars received per year in interest as percentage of dollars saved
Does not adjust for inflation
Realized Real Interest Rate: nominal interest rate adjusted for inflation
= Nominal Interest Rate - Inflation Rate
Deflation
Persistent fall in average prices and rise in value of money
Inflation rate becomes negative
Consumers postpone spending, causing economic contraction, and increasing unemployment
Deflation benefits savers, but hurts borrowers
Deflation is worse than low inflation
Disinflation
Decrease in inflation rate OR slower rise in average price level
Quantity Theory of Money
Increase in quantity of money causes an equal percentage increase in inflation
Decrease in quantity of money causes an equal percentage decrease in inflation
Takes equation M x V = P x Q; fixes V and fixes Q at potential GDP
Therefore, increase in M causes and increase in P
If real GDP were initially above potential GDP and could change, what do you think would happen when the quantity of money decreases? – The price and real GDP could both decrease
If real GDP were initially below potential GDP and could change, what do you think would happen when the quantity of money decreases? – The price and real GDP could both increase
M x V = P x Q
M = quantity of money
V = velocity of money — the number of times a unit of money changes hands during a year (the number of times a unit of money is spent on final products/services
P = average prices — CPI
Q = aggregate quantity of real output — real GDP
P x Q = nominal GDP
Phillips Curve
Graph showing inverse relation between unemployment and inflation
If Phillips Curve is true, stagflation (direct relationship between unemployment and inflation) could never happen
Suggests that a government trying to reduce inflation must accept higher unemployment (tradeoff)
Consistent with the story of demand-pull inflation
Demand-Pull Inflation
Rising average prices caused by increases in demand
Inflation and unemployment move at the different time (inverse relationship)
Unemployment falls, inflation increases (when the economy expands and more people work, spending rises, firms raise wages to attract workers, and prices increase)
Explains Phillips Curve’s trade-off between unemployment and inflation
Expansion: demand is key force causing shortages and pulling up prices for inputs (wages) and outputs
Cost-Push Inflation
Rising average prices caused by decreases in supply
Inflation and unemployment move at the same time (direct relationship)
Does not fit Phillips Curve
Can cause stagflation: combination of recession (unemployment) and inflation
Caused by (negative) supply shocks
Contraction: decrease in supply pushes up output prices,