1/53
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Codification (3 elements)
Provisions committed to writing
Issued by body with authority
Exclusivity = no other sources of law to be used because of governments authority
a. Formal Exclusivity = only 1 book and the only text valid
b. Material Exclusivity = there is solution to every case
Codification definition
Codification is the process of writing laws into official, organized system that is granted exclusive validity
Codification examples
Law codes of justinian = collection of leges (imperial laws)
Napoleon’s Code (1804)
Napoleon’s Code 1804
designed to replace the chaotic patchwork of feudal and royal laws with a single, rational, and secular system
followed a pattern similar to the Roman Institutes of Justinian
What did Napoleon’s Code consist of?
3 books
book 1 = civil status and family law
book 2 = owneship of land
book 3 = inheritance, contracts, donations
Jeremy Bentham
englightenment era
supported codification because it made laws clear and concise
Pros of codification
creates legal certainty
enforces principle of legality
intellectual economy
Jean-Jacques Rosseau
everyone gives up their natural freedom to gain civil freedom
individuals place their individual will into the hands of general will
only way to make rules is through codification
How does the concept of general will legitimize codification?(+example)
example = France, French Civil Code
before french revolution = formal concept of law, law was followed because king said so
after = rosseau argued that for law to be binding it must come from the general will
Cesare Beccaria
“nulla poene sine lege” = no punishment without law
how can statutes be used to settle disputes?
interpretation by judiciary
codifications of civil law examples
law codes of justinian
France (1804)
Germany (1900)
example case interpretation
Nix v Hedden (USA)
is tomato classified as fruit or vegetable?
important to classify the tomato beacuse of the tarriff act of 1883
botanically speaking tomatoes are fruit
in common language of people tomatoes are vegetables
methods of interpretation (list)
Grammatical interpretation
Systematic/methodical interpretation
Statue-Historical interpretation
Legal-Historical interpretation
Teleological interpretation
Authentic interpretation
grammatical interpretation
literal meaning of the words in the legislation
stare decisis = english judges cannot deviate beyond the conventional meaning of words
systematic interpretation
broad and extensive interpretation
whether rule fits in the system of law
assumes that legislation does not contradict itself
each word has a specific place in legal system
analogy often used
Statue-Historical interpretation
what did the legislators have in mind?
check parliamentary history = to see what legislators said while creating the law
subjective
Legal historical interpretation
checking the historical origin of legislation
objective = historical lineage of a legal idea
Teleological interpretation
the purpose or aim of the law
authentic interpretation
authoritative explanation by legislator
Intrinsic interpretation
grammatical interpretation
extrinsic interpretation
depends on external factors
systematic
statue historical
legal historical
teleological
authentic
Tension between legislators and interpreters
Legislators make laws need comprehensive and precise
Interpreters (judges) must adapt laws to specific circumstances
Epicureanism
341 - 270 BC
natual state of man is horrible
man overcomes this state by subjecting himself to be ruled by law
formal concept of law = law only matters when it is passed by proper authority
Stoicism
law needs to be just and equitable
material concept of law = only just statutes are laws
Zeno
creator of “stoa”
333 - 262 BC
Marcus Cicero
Roman supporter of Stoicism
106 - 43 BC
Natural law
law which is inherent and derived from nature and natural principles
discovered using reasoning
Gaius I
people are governed by statutes and customs
they are subject to “perculiar law” and common law of all mankind
Ius civile
peculiar law = specific to a state
law of a state (civitas)
ius naturale
natural law
ius gentium
law of mankind (common)
Divine law categories
written = bible
unwritten = natural law
Man-made law categories
ecclesiastical → written = corpus iuris canonici
secular → written = corpus iuris civilis
secular → unwritten = customary law
pros of natural law
can be used to put aside unreasobale or unfair man-mad laws (example: trial by ordeal)
Hugo de Groot
proved that natural law is secular not divine law
“if there was no god, there would still be natural law”
17th century what type of law?
Vernunftsrecht = law of reason
Vernunftsrecht
legal rules can be discovered through logic
emphasis on reasoning
laws should be followed because it is logically necessary, not because of authority or codification
Immanuel Kant
“dare to think for yourself!”
argued that individuals should use their own reason to determine what is right
shifted source of law from external authority to internal human logic
argument against vernunftsrecht
if reasoning is universal, then why is every professor’s systems of natural law different?
if professors cannot agree what reason is, then reason is not a solid foundation for law
Ius constitium
the law as it currently is
roman law/customary law
Ius constituendum
the law as it strives to be
perfect rational law
vernunftsrecht
why are natural lawyers in favour of codification?
intellectual economy = innefficent for each individual to always “dare think for themselves” to determine what is right in each situation, hence in codification legislators use reason once to figure out best rules
Specific code translates universal reason to logical reality = reason is universal but people live in different environments, hence law should be codified to fit the context of the people
fairness = codifiying laws means everyone knows what is forbidden,
ratio
reason
montisquieu
in favour of codification
reason is universal, but people live in different environments
law should be tailored to the context of the people
specific code translates universal reason to logical reality
Cesare Beccaria (codification)
in favour of codification
codification creates fairness because everyone knows what is forbidden
enlightenment period
17th - 18th century
emphasis on reasoning
example of natural law codified
French Civil Code (1804)
Austrian Code (1811)
Prussian code (attempted)
legal positivism
20th century
law is a set of rules created by the state
if law is passed using correct procedure it is valid no matter if it is immoral
return to epicureanism = formal concept of law
turning point in law 20th century
Nazi Germany
Nuremberg Trials
Defence for nazis = they were just following law which justified immoral acts
Gustav Radbruch
1878 - 1949
Radbruch’s formula = conflict between certainty (following written law) and justice (doing what is right)
Radbruch’s formula
Rule = generally written law (ius constitium) must be followed even if it is unfair because society needs stability
Exception = if a law is so intolerably unjust that it violates core equality of human beings that law is not law
Justice outweights written law
example case redbruchs formula
wall shooters case
1996
example natural law 21st century
DCC art. 6:2 = judges can mitigate legal consequences if results of case are unacceptably unreasonable
ECHR