Week 1 - Codification and Natural law

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/53

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

54 Terms

1
New cards

Codification (3 elements)

  1. Provisions committed to writing

  2. Issued by body with authority

  3. Exclusivity = no other sources of law to be used because of governments authority

a. Formal Exclusivity = only 1 book and the only text valid

b. Material Exclusivity = there is solution to every case

2
New cards

Codification definition

Codification is the process of writing laws into official, organized system that is granted exclusive validity

3
New cards

Codification examples

  • Law codes of justinian = collection of leges (imperial laws)

  • Napoleon’s Code (1804)

4
New cards

Napoleon’s Code 1804

  • designed to replace the chaotic patchwork of feudal and royal laws with a single, rational, and secular system

  • followed a pattern similar to the Roman Institutes of Justinian

5
New cards

What did Napoleon’s Code consist of?

  • 3 books

  • book 1 = civil status and family law

  • book 2 = owneship of land

  • book 3 = inheritance, contracts, donations

6
New cards

Jeremy Bentham

  • englightenment era

  • supported codification because it made laws clear and concise

7
New cards

Pros of codification

  • creates legal certainty

  • enforces principle of legality

  • intellectual economy

8
New cards

Jean-Jacques Rosseau

  • everyone gives up their natural freedom to gain civil freedom

  • individuals place their individual will into the hands of general will

  • only way to make rules is through codification

9
New cards

How does the concept of general will legitimize codification?(+example)

  • example = France, French Civil Code

  • before french revolution = formal concept of law, law was followed because king said so

  • after = rosseau argued that for law to be binding it must come from the general will

10
New cards

Cesare Beccaria

“nulla poene sine lege” = no punishment without law

11
New cards

how can statutes be used to settle disputes?

interpretation by judiciary

12
New cards

codifications of civil law examples

  • law codes of justinian

  • France (1804)

  • Germany (1900)

13
New cards

example case interpretation

  • Nix v Hedden (USA)

  • is tomato classified as fruit or vegetable?

  • important to classify the tomato beacuse of the tarriff act of 1883

  • botanically speaking tomatoes are fruit

  • in common language of people tomatoes are vegetables

14
New cards

methods of interpretation (list)

  1. Grammatical interpretation

  2. Systematic/methodical interpretation

  3. Statue-Historical interpretation

  4. Legal-Historical interpretation

  5. Teleological interpretation

  6. Authentic interpretation

15
New cards

grammatical interpretation

  • literal meaning of the words in the legislation

  • stare decisis = english judges cannot deviate beyond the conventional meaning of words

16
New cards

systematic interpretation

  • broad and extensive interpretation

  • whether rule fits in the system of law

  • assumes that legislation does not contradict itself

  • each word has a specific place in legal system

  • analogy often used

17
New cards

Statue-Historical interpretation

  • what did the legislators have in mind?

  • check parliamentary history = to see what legislators said while creating the law

  • subjective

18
New cards

Legal historical interpretation

  • checking the historical origin of legislation

  • objective = historical lineage of a legal idea

19
New cards

Teleological interpretation

  • the purpose or aim of the law

20
New cards

authentic interpretation

authoritative explanation by legislator

21
New cards

Intrinsic interpretation

grammatical interpretation

22
New cards

extrinsic interpretation

  • depends on external factors

  • systematic

  • statue historical

  • legal historical

  • teleological

  • authentic

23
New cards

Tension between legislators and interpreters

  • Legislators make laws need comprehensive and precise

  • Interpreters (judges) must adapt laws to specific circumstances

24
New cards

Epicureanism

  • 341 - 270 BC

  • natual state of man is horrible

  • man overcomes this state by subjecting himself to be ruled by law

  • formal concept of law = law only matters when it is passed by proper authority

25
New cards

Stoicism

  • law needs to be just and equitable

  • material concept of law = only just statutes are laws

26
New cards

Zeno

  • creator of “stoa”

  • 333 - 262 BC

27
New cards

Marcus Cicero

  • Roman supporter of Stoicism

  • 106 - 43 BC

28
New cards

Natural law

  • law which is inherent and derived from nature and natural principles

  • discovered using reasoning

29
New cards

Gaius I

  • people are governed by statutes and customs

  • they are subject to “perculiar law” and common law of all mankind

30
New cards

Ius civile

  • peculiar law = specific to a state

  • law of a state (civitas)

31
New cards

ius naturale

natural law

32
New cards

ius gentium

law of mankind (common)

33
New cards

Divine law categories

written = bible

unwritten = natural law

34
New cards

Man-made law categories

ecclesiastical → written = corpus iuris canonici

secular → written = corpus iuris civilis

secular → unwritten = customary law

35
New cards

pros of natural law

can be used to put aside unreasobale or unfair man-mad laws (example: trial by ordeal)

36
New cards

Hugo de Groot

  • proved that natural law is secular not divine law

  • “if there was no god, there would still be natural law”

37
New cards

17th century what type of law?

  • Vernunftsrecht = law of reason

38
New cards

Vernunftsrecht

  • legal rules can be discovered through logic

  • emphasis on reasoning

  • laws should be followed because it is logically necessary, not because of authority or codification

39
New cards

Immanuel Kant

  • “dare to think for yourself!”

  • argued that individuals should use their own reason to determine what is right

  • shifted source of law from external authority to internal human logic

40
New cards

argument against vernunftsrecht

  • if reasoning is universal, then why is every professor’s systems of natural law different?

  • if professors cannot agree what reason is, then reason is not a solid foundation for law

41
New cards

Ius constitium

  • the law as it currently is

  • roman law/customary law

42
New cards

Ius constituendum

  • the law as it strives to be

  • perfect rational law

  • vernunftsrecht

43
New cards

why are natural lawyers in favour of codification?

  • intellectual economy = innefficent for each individual to always “dare think for themselves” to determine what is right in each situation, hence in codification legislators use reason once to figure out best rules

  • Specific code translates universal reason to logical reality = reason is universal but people live in different environments, hence law should be codified to fit the context of the people

  • fairness = codifiying laws means everyone knows what is forbidden,

44
New cards

ratio

reason

45
New cards

montisquieu

  • in favour of codification

  • reason is universal, but people live in different environments

  • law should be tailored to the context of the people

  • specific code translates universal reason to logical reality

46
New cards

Cesare Beccaria (codification)

  • in favour of codification

  • codification creates fairness because everyone knows what is forbidden

47
New cards

enlightenment period

  • 17th - 18th century

  • emphasis on reasoning

48
New cards

example of natural law codified

  • French Civil Code (1804)

  • Austrian Code (1811)

  • Prussian code (attempted)

49
New cards

legal positivism

  • 20th century

  • law is a set of rules created by the state

  • if law is passed using correct procedure it is valid no matter if it is immoral

  • return to epicureanism = formal concept of law

50
New cards

turning point in law 20th century

  • Nazi Germany

  • Nuremberg Trials

  • Defence for nazis = they were just following law which justified immoral acts

51
New cards

Gustav Radbruch

  • 1878 - 1949

  • Radbruch’s formula = conflict between certainty (following written law) and justice (doing what is right)

52
New cards

Radbruch’s formula

  1. Rule = generally written law (ius constitium) must be followed even if it is unfair because society needs stability

  2. Exception = if a law is so intolerably unjust that it violates core equality of human beings that law is not law

Justice outweights written law

53
New cards

example case redbruchs formula

  • wall shooters case

  • 1996

54
New cards

example natural law 21st century

  1. DCC art. 6:2 = judges can mitigate legal consequences if results of case are unacceptably unreasonable

  2. ECHR