1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
in pari materia
read laws as one body
noscitur a sociis
resolve ambiguous terms via associates (e.g. bank - geographical feature vs. money place)
ejusdem generis
limit general words to same kind as preceding terms
expressio unius
what is excluded is intentionally left out
no surplusage
inclusions are on purpose
conjunctive / disjunctive
and requires all; or requires any
grammar
normal rules of grammar
title & headings
sometimes more persuasive because lawmakers busy
presumption of consistent usage
same word, same meaning
punctuation
punctuation has a meaning
last antecedent
qualifier only modifies immediately preceding phrase
absurdity
law as written is flawed if interpreted with strict literallism
ordinary meaning
interpret the law as a reasonable person would
constitutional avoidance
read the law in a manner consistent with the constitution
dog that didn’t bark
no major changes through minor language
rule of lenity
interpret in light most favorable to criminal defendant
federalism
presumes preservation of federal state relationship
presumption of non-retroactivity
presumes laws are prospective
legislative acquiescence
silence (especially if other part of law amended) after administrative decision / court ruling implies legislative consent
textualism
use only the text, don’t examine external factors (but not only words, include structure, title, etc.)
purposivism
examine the harm the law was passed to mitigate (look to title, legislative history)
intentionalism
examine the means the legislature meant to use to mitigate the harm
legislative supremacy
statute > common law
Unzueta
M: absurdity strips power from legislature. words are clear so court can’t rewrite. purpose to make whole, so offset compensation
D: majority slaves to tyranny of literalness; distinction bw text & “real statute” (purposive approach)
Filmore
intestate succession blocked by common law “can’t benefit from wrong” principle
Deem
No killer exception in statute of descents (intestate): index animi sermo → legitimate heir.
Riggs
legislature couldn’t have intended to allow murderer to profit from crime (through will)
Wadsworth
statutory minimum given to spouse, can’t be disinherited; slayer statute barring “adjudged guilty” from inheriting. expressio unius allows manslaughter convict to collect
Shrader
bars inheritence when “finally adjudged guilty” - never charged, convicted, or pled, only civil liability. Expands Filmore to civil cases bc absurd to apply higher standard than crim
Holy trinity
purposivism
Bellew
Ashcroft
Learning Resources
Skidmore
agency determination persuasive; function of thoroughness, reasoning, consistency, and expertise
Chevron
Agency deference
Loper-Bright
Court: we can interpret. Overrides Chevron, but Skidmore survives