1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Size of Local Governments
From 1957 to 2007,
# of counties: stayed the same
# of townships: stayed the same
# of municipalities: slightly increased
# of special districts: increased
# of school districts: greatly decreased
Population and Local Governments
Large variations in # of local governments and state populations.
TX has slightly more government than population predicts
KS has a lot more government than population predicts
NV has less government than population predicts
Own-Source Revenue Breakdown (2010)
Property Tax (1/3)
Sales Tax (1/3)
Charges, Utility, Income, Liquor, Vehicle, Insurance (1/3)
Expenditures Allocation (2010)
K-12 (1/3)
Housing, Environment, Public Safety, Utilities (1/3)
Insurance, Interest, Govt Admin, Transportation, Health, Other Education (1/3)
County Governments Role
Oldest form of U.S local government. Dual purpose:
Direct services: roads, public health, property
Administrators for state functions: Vehicle licensing, voter registration, elections, prosecution courts.
Typical Roles within County Government
Independent chief executive
Legislative body
Elected officials
Appointed officials
Bureaucracy
Texas County Government Structure
Voters
Commissioners, Judge, Sheriff, Constable, Treasurer
Road crew, health officer, county deputy
Revenue Sources for County Governments
Property tax (50%)
Sales tax, fees, grants, fines (50%)
Expenditures by County Governments
Law enforcement and justice system (~50%)
State jail felonies keep county jails full
Roads and bridges (10-30%)
Health and welfare (~10%)
Equity Problem in County Expenditures
Majority of revenue comes from urban residents and majority of expenditures are spent on rural residents.
Municipal Charters in Texas
General Law Charter: Municipalities only have powers specifically granted to them by the state
Home Rule Charters: Municipalities have all powers not forbidden by their charters.
Types of Municipal Governments
Mayor-council (38%)
Strong mayor
Weak mayor
Council-manager (58%) - TX
Town meeting (4%)
Commission (1%)
Mayor-Council Government Structure
Voters
Council, Mayor, Other elected officials
City departments from Mayor
Strong vs. Weak Mayor-Council
Strong: Common among large cities. Mayors budget, veto, and councils and strong mayor check and balance each other.
Can lead to corruption, so larger cities divide duties into two jobs (political matters → mayor. internal business matters → city manager)
Weak: Common among small municipalities.
Council-Manager Government Structure
Voters
Council (with mayor)
City manager (implements policy)
City departments
Occurrence of Council-Manager in Texas
This form of city government is favored in Texas (Dallas and San Antonio) and is flexible and common for mid-size cities.
City Manager Role
Responsible for:
Hiring/firing
Daily operations
Budget preparation
Efficiency of Council-Manager Government
Allows for separation of politics and administration
Mayor and council do politics, city manager does admin
Roots trace to independent school districts
Mayor's Role in Council-Manager Cities
Presides over council (with same or lesser powers as other councilors)
Spokesperson for community
Facilitates communication between elected and appointed officials
Assists council in setting goals and advocating policy
Promoter and defender of community
Representative for intergovernmental relations
Single-Member vs. At-Large City Council Seats
Single-member: a council seat representing a specific geographic district, allowing voters in that district to elect their representative.
At-large: a council seat representing the entire city, allowing all voters to elect their representatives regardless of district.
Can be used to provide less representation to minorities in poorer districts because white, well-off people are the ones that vote in city elections.
Commission Form of Municipal Government
Voters
Commission (legislative + executive authority)
City departments (Where commissioners are department heads)
Origins of Commission Government
Originated in Galveston following 1900 hurricane devastation. Wealthy business owners called for new form of city government to restore Galveston. Elected commissioners would administer various departments and comprised the city’s policy-making board.
Internal squabbling problems
Commissioners advocate for their department rather than for public good
Preferences for Government Types
Council-manager: Mid-sized suburban cities (25,000 - 250,000).
Business-like efficiency
Political neutrality
Mayor-council: Weak = Smaller cities. Strong = Larger cities that need the political focus provided by an elected mayor.
Municipal Government Comparison Table
Executive and legislative roles
Strong Mayor-Council: Checks and balances between branches
Council-manager: Appointed executive, elected legislature
Commission: Both are the same
Mayor
Strong Mayor-Council: Has formal powers
Council-manager: Symbolic
Commission: Symbolic if it even exists
Government origins
Strong Mayor-Council: Also used by state and federal govt
Council-manager: School govt inspired
Commission: County govt inspired
Policy making
Strong Mayor-Council: Competition
Council-manager: Council makes, professional implements
Commission: Cooperation
Municipal Expenditures Categories
Police, firefighters, streets (50%)
Hospitals, garbage and utilities, parks and rec, libraries, homeless/poor (50%)
School District Organizational Diagram
Voters
School board
Superintendents (larger than board)
Departments
School Districts and Council-Manager Government
Similar:
School board members are publicly elected (at-large system)
State is authority for basic school policies (partially funds schools)
Different:
Decisions are well publicized
There is more interest and knowledge from public
School Board and Superintendent Relationship
School board:
Always elected
Majority of winners aren’t too different from losers
Mostly run unopposed
Superintendents:
Always hired by board
Primary education experts
Recommendations followed by board 99% of the time
School boards don’t realize superintendents work for them…
Special District Organizational Diagram
Voters
Governing board
Special district departments
Purposes of Special Districts
Established for a specific purpose such as utilities, fire protection, transportation, flood control, hospital, etc
It can span state borders
Elected board oversees bureaucracy directly (no single chief executive)
Rationales for Special Districts
Designed to address needs of rural areas with limited govt resources
Cities and counties might be unable to finance needed projects
Special district can spread costs over several cities or counties
Ease of organization due to specific expertise and designated personnel
Incidence of Special Districts in Texas
Many special districts, growing a lot since the 1950s
Some are very large and some are very small with one resident
Land Developers and Special Districts
Shiney Hiney created a special district on acres with a mobile home to make and vote for a low property tax.
Developers can complete development faster and avoid loan liability
Conflict Between States and Local Governments
Local govts (home-rule cities) can become accustomed to hands-off approach from state govt, but the states still drive the boat. State govts are elected by residents of various localities.
Local Conflict in Texas
School funding: State can take control of school district if failing for 5 years straight.
Oil and gas: Denton wanted to ban/limit fracking and the state overturned this.
Bans on discrimination: State tried to overturn this in Dallas, San Antonio, and Austin but failed.
Bans on plastic bags: State DID overturn this in Dallas, Austin, Fort Stockton.
Asking for proof of legal residence: State overturned this for Houston, Katy, Austin, etc.
Local Control Paradox
States control over Local decisions creates a paradox because (Conservative) states always fight about the feds controlling THEIR decisions.