1/44
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
policy 6.1
a law regulation, procedure, administrative action, incentive, or voluntary practice of gov & other institutions
policy types 6.1
law/statute
ordinance
regulation
rule
guidance document
AS YOU MOVE DOWN LESS PPL REACH VICE VERSA
law statute 6.1
federal/state
whole pop
civil/criminal enforcement
ordinance 6.1
local (council legislature)
only those in jurisdiction
fine
regulation 6.1
non elected bureaucratic org
only those specified by regulation
fine
rule 6.1
public/private org
only those w/in org
no but minor consequences
guidance doc 6.1
any org w/interest in sum
only those specified by doc
no enforcement
policy process
identify problem
analyze policy
strategy & policy development
policy enactment
policy implementation
PROCESS IS EVALUATED AT ALL STEPS CYCLE!!!
public health policies
infrastructural- enabling public health statues
interventional- federal, state, local policy designed to modify health risks
intersectoral- federal, state, local policy implemented by NON-HEALTH AGENCY for primary purpose other than health (intended/unintended) health effects
take home policy 6.1
policies have consequences, both intended/unintended
policy can be important determinant of health, even when not primarily intended to affect health
rescue imperative ‘rule of rescue’ 6.1
ppl more emotional to cases of individual misfortune (PATHOS FEELINGS)
ex: troubles of a small child highlighted on the news
technological imperative 6.1
biomedical technologies have > appeal than pop based interventions, they have greater funding for technological advances
visibility imperative 6.1
THINGS ARE GOOD UNTIL THEY’RE NOT
acts that occur behind the scenes remain invisible & taken for granted until crisis arise
individualism imperative 6.1
US culture values INDIVIDUALISM
PERSONAL RIGHTS OVER PUBLIC GOODS
federal lvl barriers 6.1
legislation hampered by partisanship
strong institutional norms and the disincentives do not allow collaboration between institutions (or makes it difficult) resulting in difficulty to tackling policy reform across multiple domains
immunizations 6.1
mid 1800s: RPh distribute smallpox vaccine
late 1800s/early 1900s: RPh oversee depots for diphtheria antitoxin
WWl: education for pts & providers on vaccinations
1960s: RPh distribute oral polio vaccine
1970: national task force recommends RPh to be allowed to administer drugs (immunizations)
1993:APhA recognizes RPh have 4 roles (education/mobilization, distribution, access/administration, registries & tracking systems)
1994: washington state pharmacy association first org immunization program
1995: two RPh went to MDs for collaboration on flu vaccines
1996: APhA developed immunization program
2001: 1st RPh joins CDC ACIP
2002: physicians support RPh vaccination
present: all 50 states allow RPh to immunize
health system 6.2
org of ppl, institutions, & resources that deliver healthcare services to meet the health needs of target pops
THINK UF HEALTH
health systems influence 6.2
increase pop access to care
incentives for health systems to improve care quality
incentives for health systems to control care costs
national quality strategy 6.2
brought up by the DHHS, DHHS made the AHRQ develop a national strategy quality in healthcare
prompted by ACA in 2010
published in 2011
(3-6-9)
adopt 3-aims
that focus on 6-priorities
use 9-levers to point out functions/resources/actions that improve healthcare quality
3 AIMS NQS 6.2
better care
healthy ppl/communities
affordable care
6 PRIORITIES NQS 6.2
health & well being
prevention & treatment for leading causes of death
ppl/family centered
pt safety
effective communication/care coordination
affordable care
9 LEVERS NQS 6.2
measurement/feedback
public reporting
learning & tech assistance
certification, accreditation, regulation
consumer incentives
payment
health info tech
innovation & diffusion
workforce development
accountable care org ACOs 6.2
groups of providers that all accept responsibility for improving the overall health status, care efficiency, & healthcare experience for a defined pop
relatively large systems
consists of PCP, specialists, & greater than or equal to 1 hospital
ACOs save MEDICARE $, they share the savings, when ACOs exceeds $ they pay back a share of the losses
ACO v HMO 6.2
ACOs DO NOT restrict provider choices for PCP or referrals
ACOs are the preferred structure for MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT
ACO & pop health 6.2
pt centered medical homes (PCMH)
community resources in care coordination
clinical/community prevention services
needs assessments w/community COLLABORATIVE
> use of CHW
ACO growth 6.2
2018- slowed growth
2021- declined growth
2022- enrollment is increasing
PCMH 6.2
care delivery model w/coordination, consisting of a centralized PCP facilitating partnerships between pts, and their personal MD & other MDs, & when appropriate pts families
MEDICARE COV 6.3
A- hospitalizations (payroll taxes)
B- regular office visits cov (monthly premium)
C- medicare advantage, allows enrollment in private plans (HMO/PPO) as alt to traditional MEDICARE
D- meds Rxs (monthly premium)
MEDICAID COV 6.3
childrens health insurance program CHIP- children < 19 low income IN NEED (STATE)
social security disability insurance SSDI- approved disability (FEDERAL)
CMS budget 2025 6.3
CMS represented ~85% of HHS budget in 2025
take home MEDICAID 6.3
prior to the ACA MEDICAID eligibility was limited to specific low income groups
MEDICAID usage 6.3
most MEDICAID enrollees are children, most spenders are the elderly & PWD
MEDICAID & CHIP cover more than 1 in 3 children in US & >50% of all children in low-income families
1 out of 5 ppl in US enrolled in MEDICAID
take home MEDICAID 2 6.3
MEDICAID continues to evolve, but evolving does not = growth
take home MEDICARE 6.3
parts A&B= original MEDICARE
part C= MA MEDICARE ADVANTAGE
part C gaining popularity in enrollment!
MEDICARE D 6.3
more than half of all MEDICARE D enrollees are now in MA plans; enrollment in PDP (MEDICARE D) has declined since 2019
take home MEDICARE & MEDICAID 6.3
from 2004-2024, MEDICARE & MEDICAID comprised a greater proportion of US gov spending
take home gov spending 6.3
in 2024 US gov spending on public health insurance programs topped $1.6 trillion
take home federal budget 6.3
MEDICARE & MEDICAID comprise between 20-25% of the total US budget in recent yrs
ACA 6.4
most comprehensive piece of healthcare legislation since 1965 medicare & medicaid
published in 2011
take home on spending 6.4
SPENDING PRIMARILY OCCURS VIA THIRD PARTIES, NOT CONSUMERS
US= low personal expenditure on healthcare
ACA BIG CHANGES 6.4
bans against lifetime limits
insurances can no longer deny ppl w/pre-existing conditions
insurances can no longer drop pts when they get sick
preventative care & screenings must be covered by all new plans
adjust rates to stop charging men/women differently = SAME RATES
take home medicaid expansion 6.4
by 2022 39 states & DC adopted medicaid expansion
take home covid 6.4
COVID era brought both additional spending & enrollment & spending
take home ACA influence 6.4
policy like ACA influences pts by
access care
experience care quality
pay for care
take home main message 6.4
when evaluating whether or not a policy discussion has an impact on pts consider that ALL POLICIES & PROGRAMS THAT INFLUENCE HEALTH ARE “HEALTH POLICIES”