The charter of rights and freedoms and human rights law

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/34

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

35 Terms

1
New cards

Section 1 of the Charter – Reasonable Limits Clause 

section 1 of the charter

Rights and freedoms may be limited if the limitation can be justifies in a few and democratic society

A court will decide what is reasonable

most rights are not absolute and limits can be placed acordingly

2
New cards

Section 2 of the Charter - Fundamental Freedoms 

Freedom of conscience and religion, freedom of though, belief and opinion, and expression, freedom of peaceful assembly and association

3
New cards

Conscience & Religion 

everyone In Canada is free to practice and follow their religion or faith without fear or discrimination

The right to your on belief of right vs wrong

4
New cards

Thought, Belief, Opinion, and Expression 

All forms of communication and expression, (speech media art)

may be limited it person promotes hate or discrimination

5
New cards

Peaceful Assembly & Association

Associated with the right to peaceful protest, whats not okay is a group of three or more committing acts that instigate fear, (ccc) or anything that could escalate to a riot, at least 12 people to be considered a riot

6
New cards

Section 3-5 of the Charter - Democratic Rights 

Right for citizens to vote, Exceptions being underage, no residence, no citizenship

7
New cards

Section 6 of the Charter - Mobility 

Allowed to move where ever u would like, inside or outside of Canada

8
New cards

Sections 7-14

life liberty and security of a person

9
New cards

S. 8

Search and Seizure

10
New cards

S.9

Arbitrary detention 

11
New cards

S.10

Right to be informed;

12
New cards

S.11

to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence; to be tried within a reasonable time; not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that person in respect of the offence; to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal

13
New cards

S.12

Cruel and unusual punishment 

14
New cards

S.13

Self incrimination

15
New cards

S.14

Right to an interpreter 

16
New cards

Section 15-28 of the Charter-

Equality Rights 

17
New cards

Affirmative action

the government can create policies or programs aimed at helping disadvantages groups without being considered discriminatory

18
New cards

16-22

Official language rights (in english and french)

19
New cards

23

Minority language education rights in both english and french

20
New cards

25

Aboriginal rights and freedoms

21
New cards

27

Multicultural and heritage rights

22
New cards

28

Equality of the sexs, both women + men treated equally

23
New cards

s.33 + what sections of the charter it applys to

The not withstanding clause - Allows the government to enact or maintain laws in spite og the fact that they may violate rights and freedoms in the charter

it applys to section 2 fundamental freedoms section 7-14 legal rights section 15 equality rights

24
New cards

Resolving Infringements of Charter Rights 

If someone believes that their rights under the charter have been violated, an analysis is done to justify the infringement under the reasonable limit clause section 1, it its decided that it cannot be justified under section 1 the the law is interpreted or changed to align with the charter

25
New cards

Section 52 of the Constitution Act of 1982 

Strike down - a court ruling that a law violates one or more charter rights and therefore is invalid

Read down - a court ruling that a law violates one or more charter rights and part of it needs to be changed

26
New cards

Prejudice vs Stereotyping 

  • Prejudice - Involves someone making an assumption on another base on the group they belong to rather than their individual qualities, Typically negative

    • Negligence rather than facts

  • Stereotyping - This is when a person has a belief about an individual and assuming that everyone in that individuals group is the same

    • A prejudiced might assume that all women drive dangerously

27
New cards

Civil Rights v Human Rights 

Civil rights are granted and protected by a countries laws (right to vote)

Human rights and fundamental rights people get for being a human (right to life, charter)

28
New cards

Discrimination

Prejudice and stereotyping contribute to discrimination

The act of an individual being treated unfairly bc of prejudice or stereotyping

29
New cards

Intentional vs Unintentional discrimination 

Intentional is when someone deliberately treats a person or group unfairly (refuses woman leadership roles), Unintentional is when a rule or action disadvantages groups of people ( a job requires u to pass a physical exam)

30
New cards

Canadian Human Rights Act 1977 

Federal law that protects people in canada from descrimination

31
New cards

 Provinces have their own Human Rights Act - e.g.

Ontario Human Rights Code

32
New cards

enforcing human rights laws

ontario human rights code (1962) protects people in ontario from descrimination in specific areas of life like workplaces (ex employment, buying or renting properties

33
New cards

Understand what this process is  for enforcing human rights laws

  1. u have to file a complaint (HRTO)

  1. mediation is offered to see if the issue can be resolved with out going to a hearing

  2. hearing process

  3. if discrimination if found to have happened remedies like compensation are ordered

34
New cards

Complainant vs. Respondent 

Complainant – The person who files a complaint, claiming they were discriminated against.

Respondent – The person, business, or organization accused of discrimination and responding to the complaint.

35
New cards

What is Conciliation?

Conciliation is a process used to help two opposing parties resolve a dispute without going to a formal hearing or trial