FPSY3900: Jury Decision-Making Influences

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 26

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Lecture 4

27 Terms

1

Strength of Evidence

Differing levels of influence on final verdicts

  • more influential than weak ones

  • if there is strong ones the attorney will suggest a plea deal

New cards
2

Type of Evidence

  • evidentiary

  • extra evidentiary

New cards
3

Examples of Evidentiary Types

New cards
4

Examples of Extra Evidentiary Types

New cards
5

Schweitzer & Nunez (2018)

Method

  • 296 participants

  • Online survey

Findings

  • 10 most influential pieces of evidence identified

New cards
6

Sources of Bias

  • Pre-trial bias

  • Cognitive bias

  • Bias from external legal actors

New cards
7

Example of Cognitive Bias

pre-decisional distortion

New cards
8

Types of Implicit Biases

  • Race bias

  • Anti-LGBTQ+ bias

    • gender

  • Age bias

  • Culture bias

  • SES bias

  • Beauty bias

  • Confirmation bias

New cards
9

Anti-LGTBQ+ Bias: Impact on Decision-Making

  • Hate crimes

  • Intimate Partner Violence

  • Sexual Offences

New cards
10

Challenges Surrounding Voir Dire

  • Relevancy of LGBTQ+ topics

  • Validity of considering orientation/identity

  • Best practices regarding anti-LGBTQ+ biases

New cards
11

Relevancy of LGBTQ+ topics

  • Questions regarding views on LGBTQ+ issues are relevant in some situations

  • Issues are central to the case

    • not central but relevant to the case

    • those who are in the community may have biases for or against them?

  • Major party identifies at LGBTQ+

New cards
12

Validity of considering orientation/identity

Identification with individuals in the case

  • when do we want those in this group

  • being able to be impartial

New cards
13

Best practices regarding anti-LGBTQ+ biases

  • Identify different types of biased jurors

    • during the voire dire process

  • Consider different questioning methods

  • what are the best practices in approaching in identifying these biases

  • Steps

  1. identify bias jurors

New cards
14

Types of Bias Jurors (Anti-LGBTQ+ Bias)

  • explicit homophobes

  • closet homophobes

  • implicit homophobes

New cards
15

Types of Implicit Bias Interventions

  • Jury Orientation

  • Jury Selection

  • Jury Instruction

  • Expert Testimony

New cards
16

Example of Jury Instruction

PowerPoint or videos on the topic

New cards
17

Obstacles to Interventions

  • resources

  • hesitation

  • lack of understanding

New cards
18

Examples of Resources

  • money

  • technology

  • staffing

  • time

system may not give this

New cards
19

blank type of evidence has the largest impact

physical

New cards
20

Example of Intimate Partner Violence (Bias)

Lesbian relationships are given less credibility

New cards
21

Example of Sexual Offences (Bias)

Those who are gay were found to be not as capable for taking care of a child (???)

New cards
22

What type of questions are used for Explicit Homophobes?

hard and soft

New cards
23

What type of questions are used for Closet Homophobes?

proxy

New cards
24

How can we make jurors implicit?

  • educational videos about implicit biases in order for them to be aware

  • encourage them to take an IAT test (not for striking jurors) to identify their own biases

New cards
25

blank questions are less controversial

soft

New cards
26

What is an example of a soft question?

Would you feel comfortable if a gay couple moved next to you?

New cards
27

Those who supported the LGBTQ+ are more likely to blame the blank

perpetrator

New cards
robot