FPSY3900: Jury Decision-Making Influences

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/26

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Lecture 4

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

27 Terms

1
New cards

Strength of Evidence

Differing levels of influence on final verdicts

  • more influential than weak ones

  • if there is strong ones the attorney will suggest a plea deal

2
New cards

Type of Evidence

  • evidentiary

  • extra evidentiary

3
New cards

Examples of Evidentiary Types

4
New cards

Examples of Extra Evidentiary Types

5
New cards

Schweitzer & Nunez (2018)

Method

  • 296 participants

  • Online survey

Findings

  • 10 most influential pieces of evidence identified

6
New cards

Sources of Bias

  • Pre-trial bias

  • Cognitive bias

  • Bias from external legal actors

7
New cards

Example of Cognitive Bias

pre-decisional distortion

8
New cards

Types of Implicit Biases

  • Race bias

  • Anti-LGBTQ+ bias

    • gender

  • Age bias

  • Culture bias

  • SES bias

  • Beauty bias

  • Confirmation bias

9
New cards

Anti-LGTBQ+ Bias: Impact on Decision-Making

  • Hate crimes

  • Intimate Partner Violence

  • Sexual Offences

10
New cards

Challenges Surrounding Voir Dire

  • Relevancy of LGBTQ+ topics

  • Validity of considering orientation/identity

  • Best practices regarding anti-LGBTQ+ biases

11
New cards

Relevancy of LGBTQ+ topics

  • Questions regarding views on LGBTQ+ issues are relevant in some situations

  • Issues are central to the case

    • not central but relevant to the case

    • those who are in the community may have biases for or against them?

  • Major party identifies at LGBTQ+

12
New cards

Validity of considering orientation/identity

Identification with individuals in the case

  • when do we want those in this group

  • being able to be impartial

13
New cards

Best practices regarding anti-LGBTQ+ biases

  • Identify different types of biased jurors

    • during the voire dire process

  • Consider different questioning methods

  • what are the best practices in approaching in identifying these biases

  • Steps

  1. identify bias jurors

14
New cards

Types of Bias Jurors (Anti-LGBTQ+ Bias)

  • explicit homophobes

  • closet homophobes

  • implicit homophobes

15
New cards

Types of Implicit Bias Interventions

  • Jury Orientation

  • Jury Selection

  • Jury Instruction

  • Expert Testimony

16
New cards

Example of Jury Instruction

PowerPoint or videos on the topic

17
New cards

Obstacles to Interventions

  • resources

  • hesitation

  • lack of understanding

18
New cards

Examples of Resources

  • money

  • technology

  • staffing

  • time

system may not give this

19
New cards

blank type of evidence has the largest impact

physical

20
New cards

Example of Intimate Partner Violence (Bias)

Lesbian relationships are given less credibility

21
New cards

Example of Sexual Offences (Bias)

Those who are gay were found to be not as capable for taking care of a child (???)

22
New cards

What type of questions are used for Explicit Homophobes?

hard and soft

23
New cards

What type of questions are used for Closet Homophobes?

proxy

24
New cards

How can we make jurors implicit?

  • educational videos about implicit biases in order for them to be aware

  • encourage them to take an IAT test (not for striking jurors) to identify their own biases

25
New cards

blank questions are less controversial

soft

26
New cards

What is an example of a soft question?

Would you feel comfortable if a gay couple moved next to you?

27
New cards

Those who supported the LGBTQ+ are more likely to blame the blank

perpetrator