LEGL Test 3

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/85

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:55 PM on 4/2/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

86 Terms

1
New cards

Scarcity (in property law)

The condition in which the need for resources outstrips the available supply, making it necessary to have a system for allocating those resources.

2
New cards

State-controlled / communist property system

The government controls all resources and directs how they are divided among citizens.

3
New cards

Property-based / capitalist property system

Laws enable citizens to acquire, possess, use, and transfer scarce resources through private ownership and free markets.

4
New cards

Capital formation (role of private property)

Private property enables capital formation by allowing owners to convert rights in one resource (e.g., a house as collateral) into rights in another (e.g., cash for a business loan).

5
New cards

Real property

Land and anything permanently attached to it — including buildings, fixtures, and surface, air, and subsurface rights. Anything requiring a real estate agent to purchase.

6
New cards

Personal property

Movable resources, both tangible (physical items like a car) and intangible (non-physical rights like stocks or patents).

7
New cards

Fixture

An item that started as personal property but became so permanently attached to real property that it is treated as real property (e.g., a built-in oven or HVAC system).

8
New cards

Fee simple absolute

The most complete form of ownership — unconditional and infinite. Passes to heirs or by will with no reversion. Example: 'To Michelle forever.'

9
New cards

Fee simple defeasible

Full ownership that can be undone if a condition is violated, at which point the property reverts to the original owner. Example: 'To Michelle so long as the land is used for…'

10
New cards

Life estate (present interest)

Ownership that lasts only for the grantee's lifetime. When the grantee dies, the property either reverts to the grantor or passes to a named third party. Example: 'To Michelle for life.'

11
New cards

Reversion interest

A future interest that returns to the original grantor after a life estate ends. Example: Kathy grants 'To Michelle for life' — Kathy holds the reversion.

12
New cards

Remainder interest

A future interest that passes to a named third party (not the grantor) after a life estate ends. Example: 'To Michelle for life, then to Jim' — Jim holds a remainder.

13
New cards

Leasehold estate

Temporary ownership of property for a fixed term, as a tenant. Example: 'To Michelle, as tenant, for 12 months.'

14
New cards

Tenancy in common

Concurrent ownership where each co-tenant holds a separate, divisible share that can be sold or passed to heirs independently. Default when two people receive property without survivorship language. Example: 'To Jason and Julie.'

15
New cards

Joint tenancy

Concurrent ownership with right of survivorship — if one owner dies, all rights pass immediately to the surviving owner. Must include explicit survivorship language. Example: 'To Jason and Julie as joint tenants with right of survivorship.'

16
New cards

Right of survivorship

The feature of joint tenancy that causes a deceased co-owner's share to pass automatically to the surviving co-owner, overriding any will.

17
New cards

Easement

A right to use someone else's land in a specific way — not ownership of the land itself. Examples: utility lines, shared driveways.

18
New cards

Easement by prescription

An easement earned through use rather than agreement — similar to adverse possession but grants a right to use, not own. Must be open, wrongful (without consent), and continuous for a statutory period.

19
New cards

Natural easement (easement by necessity)

An easement created by circumstance when there is no other practical option, such as when a landlocked parcel has no access to a public road without crossing a neighbor's land.

20
New cards

Rule of first possession

The first person to take control of unowned or abandoned property acquires ownership of it.

21
New cards

Lost property

Property the owner accidentally and unknowingly parted with. The finder has ownership rights against everyone except the true owner. The finder may need to turn it in to police or take reasonable steps to locate the owner.

22
New cards

Mislaid property

Property the owner intentionally placed somewhere and then forgot. The owner of the premises (not the finder) holds it, because the true owner is more likely to return to that specific location.

23
New cards

Adverse possession

Acquiring ownership of neglected land by occupying it in a way that is: open & notorious, actual and exclusive, continuous, wrongful/non-permissive, and for the required statutory period (years). If the owner grants permission at any point, the clock resets.

24
New cards

Acquisition by confusion

Acquiring ownership when fungible goods (interchangeable goods like grain or oil) are mixed together. The mixer typically owns the combined mass but must compensate the other party proportionally.

25
New cards

Fungible goods

Goods that are interchangeable with others of the same type (e.g., grain, oil, money). Relevant in confusion cases.

26
New cards

Acquisition by accession

Acquiring property by adding something new to it. If accidental: the acquirer keeps the improved item but must compensate the original owner. If stolen: the original owner gets the modified property back.

27
New cards

Gift (property acquisition)

Transfer of property requiring: (1) donative intent, (2) delivery to the recipient, and (3) acceptance. A promise to give a gift is unenforceable, but once all three elements are met the gift is irrevocable.

28
New cards

Bailment

When an owner (bailor) entrusts their property to another person (bailee) with the expectation it will be returned.

29
New cards

Bailor

The owner who entrusts their property to someone else in a bailment.

30
New cards

Bailee

The person who receives and holds someone else's property in a bailment.

31
New cards

Bailment for mutual benefit

A bailment that benefits both the bailor and bailee. Requires reasonable/ordinary care. Example: dry cleaning, car rental.

32
New cards

Bailment for sole benefit of the bailor

A bailment where only the bailor benefits. Requires only slight care from the bailee. Example: a friend stores your furniture for free.

33
New cards

Bailment for sole benefit of the bailee

A bailment where only the bailee benefits. Requires very high (extraordinary) care. Example: you lend your car to a friend for free.

34
New cards

Burden shifting in bailments

Once the bailor proves there was a bailment and the property was damaged or not returned, the burden of proof shifts to the bailee to show they exercised the required level of care.

35
New cards
Trade secret
Any knowledge or information held by a company that gives it competitive value. Protected as long as: (1) it holds economic value from not being generally known, and (2) the owner takes reasonable measures to keep it secret. No fixed term of protection.
36
New cards
Trade secret — what qualifies
Extremely broad — can be almost anything: formulas, customer lists, processes, business strategies, software. The key is that it derives value from secrecy.
37
New cards
Trade secret audit
A review conducted to identify a company's confidential knowledge-based resources. Includes records and data classification reviews. The first step in a trade secret protection strategy.
38
New cards
Reasonable measures to preserve secrecy
Steps required to maintain trade secret protection: locking up written materials, securing digital data with firewalls/encryption, regulating visitors, properly classifying documents, and requiring NDAs and non-competes from employees, customers, and partners.
39
New cards
Misappropriation (trade secret)
Occurs when someone improperly acquires, discloses, or uses a trade secret. Does NOT include independent creation or reverse engineering, because those methods of discovery are considered legitimate.
40
New cards
Independent creation (trade secret defense)
Arriving at the same secret information entirely on your own is not misappropriation. Trade secret law does not grant a monopoly — it only protects against improper acquisition.
41
New cards
Reverse engineering (trade secret defense)
Legally obtaining a product and working backward to figure out how it works is not misappropriation. As long as the method of discovery is legitimate, trade secret law does not prohibit it.
42
New cards
Civil enforcement of trade secrets
The owner can seek: (1) an injunction — a court order requiring someone to do something or stop doing something, and (2) damages. Governed by state law and the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016.
43
New cards
Criminal enforcement of trade secrets
Violating state trade secret laws is a crime. Federally, the Economic Espionage Act (EEA) makes stealing trade secrets a federal criminal offense.
44
New cards
Injunction
A court order requiring a party to do something or to refrain from doing something. A primary remedy in both trade secret and trademark infringement cases.
45
New cards
Utility patent
Covers new, non-obvious, and useful processes, machines, compositions of matter, or improvements thereof. Term: 20 years from the filing date.
46
New cards
Design patent
Covers the new, original, and ornamental (aesthetic) design of an article of manufacture — the look and feel, not how it functions. Term: 15 years from the issue date.
47
New cards
Prior art
Existing publicly known inventions, publications, or knowledge used to evaluate whether a patent application is truly novel and nonobvious. An inventor's own public disclosure more than 1 year before filing counts as prior art against them.
48
New cards
Patentable subject matter — what cannot be patented
Mere ideas (must be reduced to practice), laws of nature, natural phenomena, mathematical formulas, and general business concepts. Simply performing an unpatentable idea 'on a computer' is not enough.
49
New cards
Reduced to practice
An invention must be more than an idea — it must be actually built or described in sufficient detail that someone skilled in the field could build it. Required for a utility patent.
50
New cards
Novelty (patent requirement)
The invention must be new and different from all prior art. It cannot have been published, sold, or put into public use by the inventor more than 1 year before the filing date.
51
New cards
Nonobviousness (patent requirement)
The invention must produce surprising or unexpected results that would not be obvious to a person skilled in that field. Simply combining old elements that each perform their known function — even for a better result — is not enough.
52
New cards
Utility (patent requirement)
The invention must do something useful. Things that do not work do not qualify for a patent.
53
New cards
Patent rights — right to exclude
A patent gives the owner the right to exclude others from making, using, selling, or importing the invention. Note: having a patent does not automatically mean you can make it yourself — you may need licenses from others whose patents yours builds upon.
54
New cards
Patent licensing
A patent owner may license their invention to others (granting permission to use it, usually for payment) or buy and sell patents outright. Often necessary when inventions build on multiple existing patents.
55
New cards
Trademark
A word, phrase, symbol, or design (or combination) that identifies and distinguishes the source of goods of one party from those of others. Protected under the Lanham Act of 1946.
56
New cards
Service mark
Same as a trademark but identifies and distinguishes the source of a service rather than a tangible product.
57
New cards
Certification mark
Used by someone other than the owner to certify that goods or services meet certain standards. The owner licenses others to use it if they qualify. Example: USDA Organic seal.
58
New cards
Collective mark
A trademark or service mark used by members of a group or organization to indicate membership or common origin. Example: a union label or professional designation like CPA.
59
New cards
Trade dress
Visual elements — including packaging, product design, and establishment decor — that identify the source of a product. Protectable if distinctive and non-functional. Example: the Coca-Cola bottle shape, Apple Store layout.
60
New cards
Trademark registration (USPTO)
Registration is not required to have trademark rights, but it grants extra benefits: national protection, the right to use ®, ability to sue in federal court, and enhanced damages. Must be used in interstate commerce. Must be renewed every 10 years.
61
New cards
TM / SM vs. ®
™ (trademark) and ℠ (service mark) can be used before registration to signal a claim. ® can only be used after official registration with the USPTO.
62
New cards
Fanciful mark
A made-up word with no prior meaning — the strongest category of trademark protection. Example: Exxon, Kodak.
63
New cards
Arbitrary mark
A real word used in a context completely unrelated to its meaning — strong protection. Example: Apple for computers.
64
New cards
Suggestive mark
A mark that hints at the product or service without directly describing it. Example: Netflix, Airbus.
65
New cards
Descriptive mark
Directly describes the good or service. Only protectable if it has acquired secondary meaning — consumers must associate it with a specific source. Example: Bank of America, The Container Store.
66
New cards
Generic term
The common name of a product or service. Never protectable as a trademark. Marks can also become genericized over time and lose protection. Examples: escalator, thermos (once trademarks).
67
New cards
Secondary meaning
When a descriptive term has acquired distinctiveness through long use such that consumers recognize it as pointing to one specific source. Required for descriptive marks to receive trademark protection.
68
New cards
Trademark infringement
Unauthorized use of a mark in a way likely to cause consumer confusion about the source of goods or services. Remedies: civil damages, injunctions, and orders to destroy infringing products. Trafficking counterfeit goods is a criminal violation.
69
New cards
Trademark fair use defense
Use of a trademarked term for discussion, criticism, parody, or comparison advertising is not infringement. Must show there is little chance of consumer confusion.
70
New cards
Trademark dilution
Use of a mark same as or similar to a famous trademark that weakens its significance, reputation, or goodwill — even without consumer confusion. Prohibited under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995.
71
New cards
Blurring (trademark dilution)
A type of dilution where use of a similar mark weakens the distinctiveness of a famous mark. Example: 'Kodak' pianos diluting the Kodak brand.
72
New cards
Tarnishment (trademark dilution)
A type of dilution where use of a similar mark in an unflattering or degrading context damages the reputation of a famous mark.
73
New cards
Copyright
Protects original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium. Does not protect ideas — only the specific creative expression of those ideas. Protection attaches automatically when both requirements are met.
74
New cards
Copyright requirements
(1) Original works of authorship — requires creative expression, not just facts or data. (2) Fixed in a tangible medium — written down, recorded, or saved. Not just spoken aloud.
75
New cards
Copyright registration
Not required for protection, but required before you can sue for infringement. You can and should mark with © immediately upon creation.
76
New cards
Work made for hire
Work created by an employee within the scope of employment belongs to the employer. For contractors, 'work made for hire' must be explicitly stated in the contract — otherwise the creator retains copyright by default.
77
New cards
Exclusive rights of copyright owner
The owner controls: (1) reproduction, (2) creation of derivative works, (3) distribution, (4) public performance, and (5) public display. Infringement requires violating at least one of these rights.
78
New cards
Copyright duration — individual author
Author's lifetime plus 70 years. Has nothing to do with the creation date.
79
New cards
Copyright duration — work made for hire / company
95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter.
80
New cards
Public domain
Works whose copyright has expired. Once in the public domain, the material is free for anyone to use without permission or payment.
81
New cards
First sale doctrine
Once a copyright holder sells a particular copy, they lose control over the distribution of that specific copy — the buyer can resell it. Does not allow reproduction — copying is still infringement. Example: reselling a used textbook.
82
New cards
Copyright fair use
Certain uses of copyrighted material are not infringement: criticism, commentary, parody, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Courts weigh four factors to determine if a use qualifies.
83
New cards
Four fair use factors
(1) Purpose and character of the use — commercial vs. educational; is it transformative? (2) Nature of the copyrighted work. (3) Amount and substantiality of the portion used. (4) Effect on the potential market for the original. The fourth factor tends to carry the most weight.
84
New cards
Key considerations when choosing a business entity
Five factors: (1) time and cost of formation, (2) continuity — does the organization survive ownership changes?, (3) managerial control — how are disputes resolved?, (4) owner liability — who is liable for firm debts?, (5) taxation — how is income taxed?
85
New cards
Double taxation vs. pass-through taxation
Double taxation: the entity pays tax on income, then owners pay tax again on distributions (e.g., C-corps). Pass-through taxation: income flows directly to owners and is taxed only once at the individual level (e.g., LLCs, S-corps, partnerships).
86
New cards
Dissolution vs. business shutdown
Dissolution is the legal termination of the organizational structure — it is not the same as the business ceasing operations. A business can reorganize under a new entity while continuing to operate.

Explore top flashcards

flashcards
Astronomy Science
63
Updated 934d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Fr. 4: Les Vêtements
35
Updated 1056d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
PID Part 1
69
Updated 472d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
AP Biology Unit 6
79
Updated 202d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
ASD4 Cap 3
35
Updated 1154d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
World History - Imperialism Test
53
Updated 1101d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Cerebellum
46
Updated 1032d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Astronomy Science
63
Updated 934d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Fr. 4: Les Vêtements
35
Updated 1056d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
PID Part 1
69
Updated 472d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
AP Biology Unit 6
79
Updated 202d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
ASD4 Cap 3
35
Updated 1154d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
World History - Imperialism Test
53
Updated 1101d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Cerebellum
46
Updated 1032d ago
0.0(0)