1/22
Evo Exam 2 :((
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What is sex?
Two parts
Meiosis w/ recombination between homologous chromosomes
Mating: association of homologous chromosomes from different individuals
Paradox of Sex
Why does sex happen if asexual reproduction is more efficient?
What is the benefit?
Potential Costs of Sex
Finding and securing partners
can be challenging or dangerous
no partner = no reproduction
finding + securing partner = exposure to danger
Increased risk of predation
Time lost from other activities
ex: foraging
Sexually transmitted infections
Chance of hybridization and inviable offspring
ex: mules
Break up fit allele combinations for multi-locus genotypes
Genome dilution
2- fold cost of sex
Genome Dilution
sexual females lose genetic representation in the next generation relative to asexual
females need to produce two offspring to replace themselves evolutionarily

Two-fold cost of sex
Reproductive mode (sexual/asexual reproduction) does not affect the # of offspring a female produces
Does not affect offspring survival
asexual females have a 2-fold advantage over sexually reproducing females
also avoid genome dilution!
List and describe the hypothesis discussed in lecture which seek to explain the evolution and maintenance of sex.
Weismann hypothesis
Negative Selection
Positive Selection
Fisher-Muller hypothesis
Complex environments
Tangled Bank, Red Queen
Weismann hypothesis
sex produces diversity that speeds the response to selection
adaptive evolution more efficient
selection responses are stronger w/ recombination ( increase in recombination rate)
sex speeds evolutionary response to selection
Connect to LD:
recombination breaks up linked alleles, reducing LD and allowing selection to act on additive alleles at different loci independently
selection can indirectly target recombination rate
Negative selection
sex slows down the accumulation of deleterious mutations/ purges bad mutations
ex: Muller’s Ratchet

Muller’s ratchet
Accumulation of mutations in small asexual populations leads to eventual local extinction
in small populations, high fitness genotypes can be lost through drift
edging population closer to extinction
asexual populations accumulate deleterious mutations in an irreversible manner
causes fitness to decline each generation
producing a ‘mutational meltdown’ extinction

What breaks Muller’s ratchet?
SEX BREAKS THE RACHET!!!!!!
recombination recovers individuals with no mutations, purges harmful mutations
get a mutation free chromosome
Positive selection
Sex speeds up the spread of beneficial mutations
Fisher-Muller hypothesis
Fisher-Muller hypothesis
Sex allows the horizontal transfer of beneficial mutations through the population
AB novel mutations
asexual: AB can only rise if both mutation occur in same individual
sexual:
A + B can arise in different individuals, but AB can form through sex
makes sex spread good mutations faster
Complex environments
Sex enhances the ability to exist in complex, changing environments
Ex: Red queen
Red Queen Hypothesis
environmental heterogeneity results from interactions among species
sex is favored bc genetically diverse offspring can withstand disease or parasites
recombination should be greatest in long-lived species where # of parasites generations far exceeds host generations
RQH: Experiment: Does selection pressure by parasites increase the frequency of sexually reproducing individuals?
YES
parasites infect the host to they are more adapted to
novel hosts have more resistance
resistance by snails conferred by novel immune system
snails more easily infected by local parasites; shows advantage of rare host genotype
genetic diversity advantage
What are the most importation disadvantages of sex?
Two Fold Cost (Cost of males)
females produce offspring but spend resources producing sons who cannot
Genome Dilution
asexual passes 100% of genes
Sexual passes 50%
diluting genetic contribution
Why isn’t reproductive mode plasticity more common?
cost of maintenance
organism has to predict environment is going to change
timing is hard
phylogenetic constraints
once a certain way for generations, its hard to switch back
Asexual phase can accumulate mutations
Mullers Ratchet
too long, genetic quality is bad
Do the direct benefits of sex explain it’s occurrence?
no strong evidence of direct benefits in most species
insufficient to explain the phylogenetic ubiquity of sex
need other explanations
Direct benefits of sex
offspring from sexual reproduction have higher mean fitness than those produced by asexual reproduction
two parents better than one IF males step up and give resources that increase fitness
co-parenting can work
doesn’t explain systems where males provide no parental care
Indirect benefits of sex
Offspring from sexual reproduction have higher variance in fitness
diversity = phenotypic variance
some are matched well to environment
Weismann
Negative selection
Positive selection
Complex environments

Wesimann’s hypothesis example
Treatment flies
recombination suppressed over 80% of genome by inversions = no new haplotypes
Control flies
recombination normal = create novel haplotypes
Selection for decreased bristle number
Why can selection work more efficiently in areas of high recombination?
recombination breaks up linked alleles, reducing LD and allowing selection to act on additive alleles at different loci independently
What explains the persistence of sex?
genetic diversity for changing environments
Red Queen Hypothesis
new combination of genes prevent parasites from killing hosts
All indirect benefits