1/4
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Contributory negligence
partial defence to negligence and occupiers’ liability
D argues that C partly caused the injuries suffered and asks court to reduce blame and damages paid
Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 states damages awarded to C can be reduced according to extent that they contributed to own harm
damages reduction will be decided by judge
seen to be used in Sayers v Harlow
Volenti non fit injuria (consent)
complete defence
Seen in Smith v Baker and Sons
defence to negligence or Occupiers Liability
D shows that C voluntarily accepted risk of harm or injury
D must show one of three things:
C knew of precise risk involved
C exercised free choice
C voluntarily accepted the risk
Defence can’t be used for road traffic accidents under Road Traffic Act 1988
Defences to OLA
volenti
con neg
exclusion clauses
warning notice
Defences to private nuisance
Statutory Authority
Prescription
Defences to Rylands v Fletcher
Act of God
Act of a Stranger
Wrongful Act of Third Party
Statutory Authority