1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
How does culture affect the perception of eye contact?
Eye contact has different social meanings across cultures
Eye contact in Western cultures
Direct eye contact is considered positive, confident, and expected in conversation.
Eye contact in Asian cultures
Direct eye contact—especially with elders or superiors—can be seen as disrespectful or confrontational.
Blais et al. (2008) Task
Participants judged whether faces were making direct eye contact.
Blais et al. (2008) Participants
Finnish (European) vs. Japanese
Blais et al. (2008) Findings
Finnish participants more accurate at perceiving direct gaze in own race faces (own race effect)
Japanesse participants showed no own-race effect + less visual experience with gaze due to cultural norms (discouraged)
Blais et al. (2008) conclusion
Cultural upbringing and visual experience affect gaze is interpreted
Even automatic social processes like gaze perception are influenced by top-down cultural factors.
Analytic vs Holistic Thinking Styles
Western Culture - Analytic
East Asian Culture - Holistic
Analytic
Focus on focal objects
Context-independent
Holistic
Focus on context and relationships
Context dependent
EU vs ASIA - Scene description
Americans described individual fish and their features.
Japanese described fish in relation to background and other objects.
→ Japanese participants paid more attention to contextual information.
Western Participants Eye movement
Western participants fixated longer on central objects.
East Asian eye movement
East Asian participants spent more time looking at backgrounds.
What does eye movement evidence suggest
→ Suggests culture shapes attentional focus during visual perception.
Frame and Line Test
Participants drew a line within a new frame, either:
Absolute task: copy same length (context-independent)
Relative task: match proportion (context-dependent)
Frame and Line Test Results
Japanese performed better on relative (contextual) tasks.
Americans performed better on absolute (focal-object) tasks.
→ Reflects culturally shaped attentional strategies.
Change Blindness
Japanese and American participants shown city scenes.
Japanese environments: more visually complex, with more ambiguous object boundaries.
Change Blindness Results
Japanese participants more sensitive to contextual changes.
Participants exposed to Japanese scenes (regardless of culture) were better at noticing changes.
→ Environments afford culturally specific attention patterns.
Developmental evidence
Children (ages 4-7) in Japan and the US completed context-dependent tasks.
No difference at age 4-5.
By age 6-7, Japanese children showed more context sensitivity.
→ Cultural differences in attention emerge with age and socialisation.
Short SOA - gaze cueing
Short SOA (cue quickly followed by target): both Japanese and American participants showed gaze cueing effect.
Long SOA - gaze cueing
Americans continued to follow gaze.
Japanese participants disengaged when they recognised the cue was non-predictive.
→ Japanese participants used contextual information more flexibly.