Culture and Attention Psy2004

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/20

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

21 Terms

1
New cards

How does culture affect the perception of eye contact?

Eye contact has different social meanings across cultures

2
New cards

Eye contact in Western cultures

Direct eye contact is considered positive, confident, and expected in conversation.

3
New cards

Eye contact in Asian cultures

Direct eye contact—especially with elders or superiors—can be seen as disrespectful or confrontational.

4
New cards

Blais et al. (2008) Task

Participants judged whether faces were making direct eye contact.

5
New cards

Blais et al. (2008) Participants

Finnish (European) vs. Japanese

6
New cards

Blais et al. (2008) Findings

Finnish participants more accurate at perceiving direct gaze in own race faces (own race effect)

Japanesse participants showed no own-race effect + less visual experience with gaze due to cultural norms (discouraged)

7
New cards

Blais et al. (2008) conclusion

Cultural upbringing and visual experience affect gaze is interpreted

Even automatic social processes like gaze perception are influenced by top-down cultural factors.

8
New cards

Analytic vs Holistic Thinking Styles

Western Culture - Analytic

East Asian Culture - Holistic

9
New cards

Analytic

Focus on focal objects

Context-independent

10
New cards

Holistic

Focus on context and relationships

Context dependent

11
New cards

EU vs ASIA - Scene description

Americans described individual fish and their features.

Japanese described fish in relation to background and other objects.

→ Japanese participants paid more attention to contextual information.

12
New cards

Western Participants Eye movement

Western participants fixated longer on central objects.

13
New cards

East Asian eye movement

East Asian participants spent more time looking at backgrounds.

14
New cards

What does eye movement evidence suggest

→ Suggests culture shapes attentional focus during visual perception.

15
New cards

Frame and Line Test

Participants drew a line within a new frame, either:

Absolute task: copy same length (context-independent)

Relative task: match proportion (context-dependent)

16
New cards

Frame and Line Test Results

Japanese performed better on relative (contextual) tasks.

Americans performed better on absolute (focal-object) tasks.

→ Reflects culturally shaped attentional strategies.

17
New cards

Change Blindness

Japanese and American participants shown city scenes.

Japanese environments: more visually complex, with more ambiguous object boundaries.

18
New cards

Change Blindness Results

Japanese participants more sensitive to contextual changes.

Participants exposed to Japanese scenes (regardless of culture) were better at noticing changes.

→ Environments afford culturally specific attention patterns.

19
New cards

Developmental evidence

Children (ages 4-7) in Japan and the US completed context-dependent tasks.

No difference at age 4-5.

By age 6-7, Japanese children showed more context sensitivity.

→ Cultural differences in attention emerge with age and socialisation.

20
New cards

Short SOA - gaze cueing

Short SOA (cue quickly followed by target): both Japanese and American participants showed gaze cueing effect.

21
New cards

Long SOA - gaze cueing

Americans continued to follow gaze.

Japanese participants disengaged when they recognised the cue was non-predictive.

→ Japanese participants used contextual information more flexibly.