W2 torts - Trespass to the person

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards
  1. Intentional Torts

Civil wrongs that protect a person’s body, land, and property from unwanted interference.

  • they are committed with intention.

2
New cards

Types of Intentional Torts

Trespass to the person, trespass to land, trespass to goods (including detinue and conversion).

3
New cards

Trespass vs Negligence

o   Trespass focuses on direct interference, while negligence requires proving duty, breach, and causation.

4
New cards

·      Trespass Actions

o   Historically developed to maintain the King's peace and discourage unlawful retaliation.

5
New cards

·      Actionable Per Se = ‘as is’

o   Trespass claims do not require proof of harm or damage.

6
New cards

·      Elements of Trespass to the Person + Three Torts Under Trespass to the Person

o   Direct interference, fault (intentional, reckless, or negligent), and no lawful justification.

o   Battery, Assault, and False Imprisonment.

7
New cards

Battery, assault, false imprisonment

  1. Battery

o   Unlawful physical contact without consent, either intentional or reckless.

·      Elements of Battery

o   Intentional act, direct contact, positive act, and unlawful touching.

·      Examples of Battery

·      Spitting on someone, pulling a chair out from under someone, or unwanted medical procedures.

  1. Assault

·      An act causing a person to reasonably apprehend imminent harmful or offensive contact.

·      Elements of Assault

·      Threat, reasonable apprehension, immediacy, and intention or recklessness.

  1. False Imprisonment

·      The total restraint of a person’s liberty without lawful justification.

·      Elements of False Imprisonment

·      Intentional act, total deprivation of liberty, and no reasonable means of escape.

8
New cards

·      Burden of Proof in Trespass Cases

·      Plaintiff must prove interference, defendant must prove lack of fault (except for highway accidents).

9
New cards

·      Williams v Milotin (1957)

Case that confirmed plaintiffs can sue in either trespass or negligence for direct, unintentional harm


10
New cards

·      Venning v Chin (1974)

·      Established that plaintiffs in highway cases must prove all elements of trespass, including fault.

Take away = is the onus of proof different for highway collisions and why? 
What we learn is that the onus of proof is different when the accident or on occurs on a highway. We call this an exception to the general rule, and it's based on the acceptance of risk justification.
	- Courts do need to define an accident for a highway purposes one day, stating it has to be decided some day what a highway accident is but clearly it will include things on collisions, a car and pedestrian, things lowered on highway.  

ONUS is on the defendant 
Plaintiff must prove all elements of trespass

11
New cards

significance of Williams a d venting cases

12
New cards

x5 key features of intentional torts (WILL be using this ALOT!!)

13
New cards

tort of battery

  1. element;

  1. element;

element 3';

14
New cards

·      Scott v Shepherd (1773)

15
New cards

ASSAULT

16
New cards

17
New cards

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

18
New cards

false imprusonment cases

19
New cards

KEY CASE; Myer Stores & Ors v Soo (1991) 2 VR 597

20
New cards

·      False Imprisonment Without Physical Barriers

= Situation of you don’t have to be physically locked up in a room or tied to a chair to be falsely imprisonment.

  • You could be falsely imprisoned because you feel that you have no option but to remain in a particular situation.

  • Due to authority etc.