3. Memory Representations in Temporal Neocortex

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/44

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

45 Terms

1
New cards

How did Tulving (1972) dissociate episodic and semantic memory in the context of amnesia?

  • Episodic: events, metal time-travel, self-referential, fragile/ easily forgotten, affected in amnesia, better when young

  • Semantic: fact, time/place NOT coded, NOT self-referential, more durable/consolidated, not affected in amnesia, better when old

<ul><li><p>Episodic: events, metal time-travel, self-referential, fragile/ easily forgotten, affected in amnesia, better when young</p></li><li><p>Semantic: fact, time/place NOT coded, NOT self-referential, more durable/consolidated, not affected in amnesia, better when old</p></li></ul><p></p>
2
New cards

How does patient KC demonstrate Tulving’s dissociation?

  • episodic: in addition to inability to remember recent and new events he had very pronounced retrograde amnesia for much of his life (unlike HM) - including when he was a machinist

  • semantic: retained some concepts gained as a machinist - e.g. key-way shank and feed screw

3
New cards

What kind of dissociation does patient KC’s case demonstrate?

  • single dissociation

  • deficit of one domain (episodic memory) with preservation of another (semantic memory)

  • he couldn’t give details of his accident or remember changing a tyre, yet he could describe the equipment used to change a tyre

<ul><li><p>single dissociation</p></li><li><p>deficit of one domain (episodic memory) with preservation of another (semantic memory)</p></li><li><p>he couldn’t give details of his accident or remember changing a tyre, yet he could describe the equipment used to change a tyre</p></li></ul><p></p>
4
New cards

What would be required for a double dissociation for separation of semantic/episodic?

need other patients that show impairment of semantic not episodic memory

<p>need other patients that show impairment of semantic not episodic memory</p>
5
New cards

why is a single dissociation viewed as insufficient to demonstrate separate systems?

episodic memory might be more vulnerable to damage than semantic memory within a single system

6
New cards

Which cases do provide a double dissociation between episodic and semantic mem?

  • amnesia vs semantic dementia

  • in amnesia: episodic impaired, semantic preserved

  • in semantic dementia: semantic impaired, episodic preserved

<ul><li><p>amnesia vs semantic dementia</p></li><li><p>in amnesia: episodic impaired, semantic preserved</p></li><li><p>in semantic dementia: semantic impaired, episodic preserved</p></li></ul><p></p>
7
New cards

What is the key deficit in semantic dementia?

poor understanding of words and objects

8
New cards

What are the key aspects of semantic dementia?

  • subtype of frontotemporal dementia

  • progressive loss of conceptual knowledge across modalities

<ul><li><p>subtype of frontotemporal dementia</p></li><li><p>progressive loss of conceptual knowledge across modalities</p></li></ul><p></p>
9
New cards

Where is peak atrophy is SD normally located compared to HM?

damage adjacent to hippocampus but still distinct

<p>damage adjacent to hippocampus but still distinct</p>
10
New cards

How do those with semantic dementia perform episodic memory and does it show a dissociation

when recalling events: use very high frequency words , but episodic detail maintained

  • double dissociation with amnesia: relatively intact memory for recent events and impaired semantic memory

<p>when recalling events: use very high frequency words , but episodic detail maintained</p><ul><li><p>double dissociation with amnesia: relatively intact memory for recent events and impaired semantic memory</p></li></ul><p></p>
11
New cards

what are the results for identical and non-identical object recognition in semantic dementia patients?

  • patients shown an item and asked to pick it out later, in non-identical condition a different form of the same object is used

  • SD patients can recognise objects when they are identical

  • for non-identical objects, meaning is important and performance is predicted by which items are still understood on semantic tests

  • if patient still has knowledge/concept of item they are perfect on both

  • however if concept is lost they perform much more poorly

  • they have lost what would bind those two pictures into the same concept

<ul><li><p>patients shown an item and asked to pick it out later, in non-identical condition a different form of the same object is used</p></li><li><p>SD patients can recognise objects when they are identical</p></li><li><p>for non-identical objects, meaning is important and performance is predicted by which items are still understood on semantic tests</p></li><li><p>if patient still has knowledge/concept of item they are perfect on both</p></li><li><p>however if concept is lost they perform much more poorly</p></li><li><p>they have lost what would bind those two pictures into the same concept</p></li></ul><p></p>
12
New cards

How does the research evidence two distinct systems for episodic and semantic memory? the theory of distinct roles in hippocampus and anterior temporal lobe

  • patient KC and studies of semantic dementia provide a double dissociation between episodic and semantic memory

  • hippocampus: encodes and recreates unique multimodal experiences of people.places/objects in events (i.e. episodic memory)

  • ATL: extraction of similarities between multimodal experiences to create concepts (i.e. semantic memory)

  • separating memories vs merging them

<ul><li><p>patient KC and studies of semantic dementia provide a double dissociation between episodic and semantic memory</p></li><li><p>hippocampus: encodes and recreates unique multimodal experiences of people.places/objects in events (i.e. episodic memory)</p></li><li><p>ATL: extraction of similarities between multimodal experiences to create concepts (i.e. semantic memory)</p></li><li><p><strong>separating memories vs merging them</strong></p></li></ul><p></p>
13
New cards

what is the speed of learning in the hippocampus and how is it adaptive?

  • fast learning in the hippocampus

  • quickly binds together the elements of episodes

  • few neurons code for each item, so similar memories can be separated

  • we want sparse code, perfect for event memory

14
New cards

What is the speed of learning in the neocortex and how is it adaptive?

  • slower learning in neocortex

  • similar features shared by multiple experiences are encoded strongly

  • useful for semantic category learning

  • this prevents catastrophic interference

  • aim to capture similarities over time very, integrating over time

15
New cards

what is catastrophic interference?

loss of old memories when new material is learned

16
New cards

How can Tuling and Squire’s theories of episodic and semantic memory be compared?

Tulving: Episodic versus Semantic

Squire: Episodic then Semantic 

  • hippocampus has time-limited role - systems consolidation - transfer to neocortex

<p>Tulving: Episodic <strong>versus</strong> Semantic</p><p>Squire: Episodic then Semantic&nbsp;</p><ul><li><p>hippocampus has time-limited role - systems consolidation - transfer to neocortex</p></li></ul><p></p>
17
New cards

What is the result of disrupting synaptic consolidation at different time spans?

  • inhibition of protein synthesis which allows structural changes at synapse in long-term potentiation

  • disrupts memory for 1 hour

  • no effect on memory is protein synthesis disrupted after 1 hour of learning

<ul><li><p>inhibition of protein synthesis which allows structural changes at synapse in long-term potentiation</p></li><li><p>disrupts memory for 1 hour</p></li><li><p>no effect on memory is protein synthesis disrupted after 1 hour of learning</p></li></ul><p></p>
18
New cards

What is the result of disruption system consolidation at different time frames?

  • hippocampal lesion disrupts memory for 28 days

  • if hippocampus is damaged one month after encoding, there is still some memory loss

  • if hippocampus is damaged two weeks after learning, 50%: some but not all information has been transferred out of hippocampus

<ul><li><p>hippocampal lesion disrupts memory for 28 days</p></li><li><p>if hippocampus is damaged one month after encoding, there is still some memory loss</p></li><li><p>if hippocampus is damaged two weeks after learning, 50%: some but not all information has been transferred out of hippocampus</p></li></ul><p></p>
19
New cards

What can we conclude from studies of disrupting consolidation?

  • when hippocampus is damaged after learning has occurred, memories are especially vulnerable if they were only recently acquired.

  • older memories are more preserved

20
New cards

What are the three points on the gradient of retrograde amnesia?

  • events that happened well before brain injury are spared

  • events that happened just before brain injury are impaired

  • ongoing events that happened after brain injury are severely impaired (this is anterograde amnesia)

<ul><li><p>events that happened well before brain injury are spared</p></li><li><p>events that happened just before brain injury are impaired</p></li><li><p>ongoing events that happened after brain injury are severely impaired (this is anterograde amnesia)</p></li></ul><p></p>
21
New cards

What did Graham and Hodges find in amnesia patients when conducting an autobiographical memory interview?

  • temporal gradient

  • better preserved childhood memories

<ul><li><p>temporal gradient </p></li><li><p>better preserved childhood memories</p></li></ul><p></p>
22
New cards

What did Graham and Hodges find in semantic dementia patients when conducting an autobiographical memory interview?

  • reverse temporal gradient

  • better preserved recent memories (around 4 years)

<ul><li><p>reverse temporal gradient</p></li><li><p>better preserved recent memories (around 4 years)</p></li></ul><p></p>
23
New cards

How can we explain the temporal gradient in amnesia?

  • older memories have be retrieved more times - this changes their quality (and neural basis); they become more story-like and reliant on semantics

  • older memories are more reliant on neocortex and less dependent on hippocampus over time, following consolidation

24
New cards

effect of amnesia on encoding

  • impaired in amnesia - poor learning of new events

<ul><li><p>impaired in amnesia - poor learning of new events</p></li></ul><p></p>
25
New cards

effect of amnesia on retrieval before consolidation

  • impaired in amnesia - poor retrieval of events just prior to brain injury

  • relying on hippocampal process to get those memories out

<ul><li><p>impaired in amnesia - poor retrieval of events just prior to brain injury</p></li><li><p>relying on hippocampal process to get those memories out</p></li></ul><p></p>
26
New cards

effect of amnesia on retrieval after consolidation

  • NOT impaired - normal retrieval of events from childhood

  • consolidation occurred, still get the memory even in the absence of hippocampus, no longer dependent on it

27
New cards

What kind of sleep is proposed to be important for declarative memory consolidation?

slow-wave sleep

<p>slow-wave sleep</p>
28
New cards

How did Marshall et al. (2006) provide evidence for sleep and consolidation?

  • gave electrical stimulation that enhances slow wave rhythm

  • boosted verbal learning

<ul><li><p>gave electrical stimulation that enhances slow wave rhythm</p></li><li><p>boosted verbal learning</p></li></ul><p></p>
29
New cards

How did Friedrich et al. (2014) provide evidence for the idea that sleep helps babies generalise word meaning?

  • measured event-related potentials to words; to look for markers of comprehension

  • babies aged 9-18 months who napped for 1.5h were better at generalising meaning beyond the exemplar that was learned (compared with babies who stayed awake)

  • the result correlated with sleep-based electrical activity (‘sleep spindles”)

30
New cards

what was found in rats regarding reactivation during sleep?

  • neurons that code for route through maze reactivate in that order during slow wave sleep

  • wilson and mcnaughton 1994

<ul><li><p>neurons that code for route through maze reactivate in that order during slow wave sleep</p></li><li><p>wilson and mcnaughton 1994</p></li></ul><p></p>
31
New cards

What did Diekelmann et al find regarding reactivation in sleep with humans when learning card location pairings and presenting odours at the same time?

  • odours re-presented during sleep or wake

  • then interference learning

  • better memory with odour cue, and increase hippocampal engagement

  • smell acts as a cue for the hippocampus to replay the memory and repeat the card locations in sleep

<ul><li><p>odours re-presented during sleep or wake</p></li><li><p>then interference learning</p></li><li><p>better memory with odour cue, and increase hippocampal engagement</p></li><li><p>smell acts as a cue for the hippocampus to replay the memory and repeat the card locations in sleep</p></li></ul><p></p>
32
New cards

In response to the research, what conclusion can be made regarding the role of sleep in memory?

  • SWS plays an active role in stabilising memories

  • during SWS, there may be reactivation of hippocampal-dependent memories

  • this may promote their consolidation - integration with similar memories

  • there is still lots to understand: other sleep stages (REM) might be important in a different way

33
New cards

Comparing Tulving (episodic versus semantic) and Squire (episodic then semantic)

  • there are clearly two dissociable memory stores yet systems consolidation suggests an interdependence

  • challenge to squire: hippocampus may remain important for some old memories (multiple trace theory)

  • does acquisition of semantic information depend on episodic memory (as predicted by squire)? those with hippocampal damage wouldn’t be able to learn anything

34
New cards

What is Nadel and Moscivitch (1997) multiple trace theory?

Hippocampus re-encodes during retrieval to create multiple traces and remains important fro any “recollection” experiences (even though most information is transferred to cortex)

hippocampus makes a memory of retrieving that memory

35
New cards

What effects on memory are seen in developmental amnesia?

  • cases of Jon, Beth and Kate with bilateral hippocampal damage from birth (hypoxia due to complications in labour)

  • amnesic: poor at verbal and non-verbal learning

  • IQ, academic attainment, reading comprehension, working memory, semantic memory all developed normally

  • 44% reduction in hippocampus relative to controls

<ul><li><p>cases of Jon, Beth and Kate with bilateral hippocampal damage from birth (hypoxia due to complications in labour)</p></li><li><p>amnesic: poor at verbal and non-verbal learning</p></li><li><p>IQ, academic attainment, reading comprehension, working memory, semantic memory all developed normally</p></li><li><p>44% reduction in hippocampus relative to controls</p></li></ul><p></p>
36
New cards

Which areas are spared in developmental amnesia and what might it explain?

  • entorhinal and perirhinal cortex relatively spared in developmental amnesia - might provide basis for semantic learning

  • learning occurs in these cortex regions adjacent to hippocampus

37
New cards

entorhinal cortex

gateway between hippocampus and cortex

38
New cards

perirhinal cortex

important for object recognition (typically damaged with hippocampus in dense amnesia)

39
New cards

take home messages

40
New cards

what is an engram

the physical and biochemical changes underlying memory storage in the brain (memory traces)

41
New cards

what differences can be from from storage of animate vs inanimate knowledge?

Animate knowledge deficits are often associated with lesions of the temporal cortex, deficits in inanimate knowledge, with frontoparietal damage

  • Ability to identify living things depends more on sensory knowledge (stored in temporal cortices), whereas the ability to identify nonliving things depends more on functional knowledge (stored in frontoparietal cortices)

42
New cards

According to the most popular model of declarative memory, what happens during encoding

during encoding, memory traces are stored in the cortical regions that process each type of information; at the same time, the hippocampus stores indices pointing to these cortical locations. During this period of storage, some memories are strengthened (by consolidation) while others are lost.

43
New cards

According to the most popular model of declarative memory, what happens during retrieval and what happens in amnesia

  • During retrieval, activation of hippocampal index representations leads to the reactivation of cortical traces.

  • Damage to the hippocampus prevents access to cortical memory traces, producing memory loss (amnesia)

44
New cards

When is the hippocampus no longer needed?

after memories have been consolidated, explaining why amnesia patients like H.M. can often remember remote memories.

45
New cards

Which regions are assumed to mediate control processes during both encoding and retrieval?

  • prefrontal and parietal