1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Adversarial Judical System
2 parties in a legal dispute present their case and the court decides who wins/loses
Investigatory system
Judge controls questioning/police, written document using evidence is presented, document is presented to different judge, witnesses verify accuracy
Original jurisdiction
Lower court hears case for the first time
Appellate jurisdiction
Higher court reviews lower court’s decision
Common law
judge-made law made based off of previous decisions
Executive order
has the force of a law, without the involvement of Congress
Stare decisis
Judges compare facts and rulings from similar previous cases to reach conclusion about new case
US Code
Compilation of laws ever passed by Congress, reflects their priorities and concerns
Penal code
State codes with all criminal law
Administrative code
Rules and regulations made by bureaucrats through administrative rule, have force of law
Preponderance of evidence
More likely that the accused caused the harm claimed by complainant
Judiciary Act of 1789
Supreme court
Court of appeals
District courts
Descriptive Representation
Representatives of Major demographic groups, proportional to population at large
Substantive Representation
Serves concerns of racial, gender, or ethic groups that one belongs to
Symbolic Representation
Court should mirror our national geographic profile, equal opportunity for all
Amicus curiae
“Friend of the court” brief; from interest groups
Writ of ceritiorari
Order by higher courts from lower courts to send cases up to review
SCOTUS decision making
Briefs submitted, amicus curiae briefs from interested parties
Oral arguments from attorneys
Justices conference: have a discussion, nonbinding votes taken, rough drafts written
Justices opinions drafted
Final decision announced
Judicial activism
Court’s willingness to reject laws, step away from past precedents
Judicial restraint
judiciary should not check the power of exec/leg branches, unless actions violate the Constitution
Civil rights
guaranteed rights under equal protection clause and due process
Strict scrutiny test
Hear a challenge to laws with suspect classifications (ethnicity, gender)
Gov must show it’s necessary to have differential treatments in the best interests of the people
Heightened scrutiny test
gov must show that sex based discrimination is really related to important public interest the gov is responsible for
Ordinary scrutiny
Courts require gov to show that any differential treatment is necessary and rational to achieve public interest the gov is responsible for
De jure segregation
Legally mandated separation of races, normal in the south
De facto segregation
manifested in the north through housing, employment, and education
Title 9
Prohibited sex-based discrimination in educational institutions receiving federal money
Equal rights amendment
Equality of rights under the law shall not be prohibited on the basis of sex
First wave of women's rights
Early advocates for women’s civil rights, focused on Suffrage
Second wave of women’s rights
focused on rights in the workplace, equal legal rights for women
Third wave of women’s rights
women have unequal access to legal rights, due to differences in race, class, and religion
Civil liberties
constitutionally established, protect citizens and their opinions from gov. interference
Civil rights
positive actions of government for the purpose of protecting citizens against discrimination
Differences
Civil liberties protect individuals from govt actions
Civil rights protect groups from discrimination
Unprotected speech
False statements to harm reputations
Obscenity
“Fighting words” - causes public disorder