1/27
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What is research?
detailed study of a subject in order to discover (new) information or reach a (new) understanding” - Cambridge english dictionary
getting to an answer of a question
Putting that information out into the world
Why we do research?
to understand different phenomena - why it happened, how it happened
Methods for answering questions
intuition - generate research questions
Authority - consult existing literature
Rationalism - use logic to design the study
Empiricism - collect data & analyse and identify findings
All above - reconsider the question. Ask a new question
Research process
Generate research question
Consult existing literature
Design research
Collect relevant data
Analyse and identify the findings
Reconsider the question
What influnce does research have?
political lections and campaigns
Medicines and vaccines
Educational curricula
Adverts on social media
Transport timetabling
HR policies
Online shopping
Space Travel
health campaigns
Etc etc
Research - why learn about it?
We often take research at face value. We must learn about it so we can evaluate:
look at the quality of the research
Quality of the evidence
The replication crisis
many published research cannot be replicated
Not just psych, cancer research has had the same issue
Published In 2015, attempt to replicate 100 studies. Only 36% were positive replications when compared to the original studies
Positive replication
finds the same result as original study
Negative replication
find diff results than original study
Why replication difficult?
original has use of Questionable Research Practices - cut out, change small things, edit methodology for bias
Bias in publishing problem - file drawer problem, easier to publish ”significant, novel or interesting” findings. More research in drawer than not
Failure to report sufficient methodological details in papers. Methodology not enough detail. Cant replicate bc they haven’t done things the same way as the researchers did
Replicability
obtaining consistent results across studies aimed at answering the same scientific question, obtaining own data
Open research
related to replicability
Making research transparent
A lot of research funded through taxation - let tax payer see where money goes
Keep all open so everyone can see what we’Re doing, making research accessible to everyone
Make repicability easily
Open Research Principles
REPLICATION,
OPEN ACCESS,
PRE-REGISTRATION (before study, make public questions, hypothises and methodology which cant be changed),
OPEN DATA (let ppl access your data),
OPEN MATERIALS (making study materials publicly available (access to survey questions, help w replication
Scientific method
based on existing knowledge and theory
Generate hypothesis
Test hypothesis in controlled & systemic ways
Data collected can be analysed using stats
Quantitative
measuring in a numerical, objective way
May have larger groups
Surveys
Nomothetic approach (seeking general truths, generalisable knowledge, similar patterns, prediction of behaviour)
Problem - average individual may not exist!
Positivism - reality is objective and measurable
Scientific method
Can never fully be certain of anything. Lots of evidence doesnt mean is true
Qualitative
experiences, quality, depth. Often fewer individuals
Interview methods, analysing drawings
Idiographic approach (looking at the unique experiences of individuals)
Problem - may not be useful generalisable
Constructivism - no objective reality, what we experience is based on what we construct
post-positivism
we don’t know everything and we can’t know everything. All we can do is get the best approximation of reality.
quant is post-positivist
To get as close to truth/reality, we need FALSIFIABLE and TESTABLE theories
Paradigms
fundamental frameworks. Set of things we accept as true, theories and methodological beliefs
Underlying assumptions, accepted theories methodologies and standards to define what is valid/what isn’t
Ex: quantum physics - light can be both a wave and a particle - when observing a phenomena, you may gain different results
To consider in research
objective
Reliable
Valid
Generalisable
No theory can be proven. But best theories are:
close approximations of truth
Srvive logical and empirical testing
Testable and falsifiable. Need to be able to be proven as false
Dependent variables
what we measure. The outcome. Ex: heart rate, flame and height in bunsen burner. The effect of independent variable
Independent variables
that which we manipulate to see results. Ex: smokrs vs non-smoker. Gas in bunsen burner
Hypothesis
Predictive statement regarding an outcome. it can be tested
How accuracy of theory is decided
We have enough evidence to reject a theory.
Or we dont have enough evidence to reject the theory.
Variables
characteristicc of property that can differ and be measured