A system by which a society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy
2
New cards
Basic Principles of Social Stratification
A trait of society, not just individual differences Persists over generations Is universal, but variable regarding amount and type of inequality Involves inequality and beliefs of fairness
3
New cards
Caste
Stratification based on ascription or birth
4
New cards
Class
Based on birth and individual achievement
5
New cards
Social mobility
A change in position within the social hierarchy
6
New cards
Meritocracy
Stratification based on personal merit
7
New cards
Status consistency
The degree of uniformity in a person’s social standing across various dimensions of social inequality
8
New cards
Classless societies
A society in which no one is born into a social class. The former Soviet Union claimed to be one, but the party members had great advantages
9
New cards
Ideology
Cultural beliefs that justify particular social arrangements, including patterns of inequality
10
New cards
Davis-Moore thesis
Social stratification has beneficial consequences for the operation of a society The greater the importance or talent required of a position, the more rewards a society attaches to it Egalitarian societies offer little incentive for people to try their best
11
New cards
Class Conflict
Marx was concerned with poverty amid riches
12
New cards
Capitalists
Own and operate businesses
13
New cards
Proletarians
Sell labour for wages
14
New cards
Alienation
The experience of isolation and misery resulting from powerlessness It should lead to the overthrow of capitalists and introduction of socialist system, serving needs of all
15
New cards
Fragmentation of the capitalist class
Many stockholders therefore much direct stake in the capitalist system
16
New cards
Blue-collar
Lower-prestige jobs, mostly manual labour
17
New cards
White-collar
Higher-prestige jobs, mostly mental activity
18
New cards
Stratification(Weber)
is a multidimensional ranking: economic classes, status (prestige), and power
19
New cards
Socioeconomic status (S E S)
Composite ranking based on several dimensions of social inequality
20
New cards
Conspicuous consumption
buying and using products because of the “statement” they make about social position
21
New cards
Symbolic-Interaction Theory: Stratification in Everyday Life
People interact primarily with others of about the same social standing as people tend to live with others like themselves
22
New cards
Hunters and gatherers
Little inequality
23
New cards
Horticultural and Agricultural
More inequality as surplus begins
24
New cards
Industrial
More inequality with more specialization Though with increasing education inequality diminishes and a lessening of men’s domination of women
25
New cards
Kuznets’ curve
More pronounced stratification comes with technological advances
26
New cards
Income
Earnings from work or investments
27
New cards
Wealth
Total value of assets minus debts
28
New cards
Top 20%
received 41.4 percent of all income
29
New cards
Bottom 20%
receive 6.7 percent of all income
30
New cards
Occupational prestige
Doctors versus waiters
31
New cards
The upper class
Inherit enormous wealth or “new rich” entrepreneurs 5 % of the population Top executives or senior government officials
32
New cards
The middle class
Professionals to service people 40-45% of the population Upper-middles are professionals Average-middles are middle managers, clerks, and skilled blue-collar workers
33
New cards
The working class
Less skilled blue-collar jobs 33% of the population Jobs require discipline, but not imagination Jobs offer few benefits
34
New cards
The lower class
Temporary, low prestige jobs 20% of the population Slightly better off than unemployed Live in poorer neighbourhoods and in rural areas
35
New cards
Health
Richer live longer and are healthier
36
New cards
Values and Attitudes
New rich engage in conspicuous consumption, use material objects as status symbols, more tolerant of behaviours like homosexuality, but also more fiscally conservative
37
New cards
Family and Gender
Richer promote development of “cultural capital” in children and have more egalitarian relationships
38
New cards
Upward Mobility
With college degree or higher-paying job
39
New cards
Downward Mobility
Drop out of school, losing a job, or divorce
40
New cards
Intragenerational mobility
Change in social position during one person’s lifetime
41
New cards
Intergenerational mobility
Upward or downward movement that takes place across generations within a family
42
New cards
Myth vs. Reality
Mobility over past century has been fairly high Intragenerational mobility is small, not dramatic Long-term trend has been upward Social mobility since the 1970s has been uneven Short-term trend has been downward
43
New cards
Feminization of poverty
The trend of women making up an increasing proportion of the poor Female lone-parents
44
New cards
Two Views
Poor are responsible: They cannot or will not take advantage of opportunities
45
New cards
Culture of poverty
Resignation leads to self-perpetuating cycle of poverty
46
New cards
Neoli​beralism
Political ideology that proposes to transfer government control and regulation into the hands of private actors
47
New cards
Society is responsible
Loss of jobs in inner cities eliminates opportunity
48
New cards
746,000 Canadians (3.1 percent)
are working poor
49
New cards
The Working Poor
Main income recipient worked 910 or more hours while remaining low-income based on the L I C O
50
New cards
Sociological evidence points toward society, not individual character traits
as the primary source of poverty because more and more available jobs offer only low wages