Racial Slurs in Class: Verushka Lieutenant-Duval Case

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/9

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering key concepts and dilemmas surrounding the debate on mentioning racial slurs in educational settings, drawing from the Verushka Lieutenant-Duval case.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

Verushka Lieutenant-Duval Case

A case involving the mention of racial slurs in a classroom setting, sparking debate over speech in education.

2
New cards

Eradicationist Dilemma

A viewpoint, often held by multicultural liberals, that places limits on hate speech or offensive speech, frequently deeming context irrelevant and the mention of a slur as intrinsically wrong.

3
New cards

Accommodationist Dilemma

A viewpoint, often held by muscular liberals, that advocates for no restrictions on hate speech or offensive speech once context is understood or for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.

4
New cards

Elizabeth Stordeur Pryor, PhD

An academic associated with the eradicationist viewpoint, advocating for 'Ground Rules' regarding offensive speech.

5
New cards

Randall Kennedy, PhD

An academic associated with the accommodationist perspective regarding offensive speech, emphasizing contextual understanding.

6
New cards

Context Ignored (Eradicationist Criticism)

A criticism of the eradicationist viewpoint, where the context of mentioning a slur is dismissed as irrelevant, especially if the speaker is white.

7
New cards

Erasure of Valid Moral Distinctions (Eradicationist Criticism)

A criticism of the eradicationist viewpoint, pointing out the blurring of differences between the 'use' and 'mention' of offensive language.

8
New cards

Strategic Hyperbole (Eradicationist Criticism)

A criticism of the eradicationist viewpoint, suggesting that mentioning offensive speech is often exaggeratedly described as harmful, violent, or dehumanizing.

9
New cards

Students Offended/Triggered (Accommodationist Concern)

A challenge for the accommodationist viewpoint, acknowledging that students may be genuinely offended or triggered by verbal slurs, regardless of intent.

10
New cards

Words Carry Historical Weight (Accommodationist Concern)

A challenge for the accommodationist viewpoint, highlighting that not all words have the same historical impact or potential for harm, with some considered 'nuclear bombs' of slurs.