1/123
Flashcards from the notes. Developmental Psych
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis
A warm intimate and continuous relationship must be formed with the child and caregiver during their critical period- if this is failed to form, the child may experience emotional maladjustment in the future
Deprivation
Disruption or sudden loss of an attachment during critical period (2-3 years)
Privation
Failure to form any sort of attachment during critical period- can be due to poor parenting or child raised in isolation (an attachment has never been formed)
Evolutionary theory
Believes a tendency to form an attachment is innate
Bowlby’s evolutionary theory
Based on Bowlby’s 44 Juvenile thieves study ASCMI
A- Attachment is adaptive: believes children are more likely to survive if kept safe
S- Social releases of an infant (physical: their cute baby face features, behavioural: ‘cooing/crying’) which attracts the adult to the child= attention
C- Critical Period: Important time for a child to form an attachment with caregiver- failure to do so will effect the childs future negatively
M- Monotropy: Infant forms one special attachment with mother- if mother isn’t available then any other primary caregiver
I- Internal Working Model: Through monotropic attachment infant would form an IWM- special schema for relationships= Future relationship would be impacted by this
Evaluation of John Bowlby’s Study
+Ecological Validity & Application
Application to real life proves high ecological validity: introduce policies to avoid young children being separated from their primary caregiver for long periods.
+Empirical Research
Bowlby's Juvenile Thieves study was one of the earliest empirical studies to investigate the link between early maternal separation and later behavioural problems in children. This research provided insights into the potential consequences of maternal deprivation, and led to more research.
-Reductionist
Oversimplified concept of MDH: Michael Rutter argued that Bowlby overlooked the long term effects of the loss of attachment, separation and complete lack of attachment.
-Results Validity
Bowby’s theory does not show a cause-and-effect relationship between the separation from the mother and the development of affectionless psychopathy. Furthermore , other factors could have been involved, such as the reason for separation, role of the father, etc…
-Researcher Bias & Validity
Study is vulnerable to researcher bias as he knew whether the children were in the theft group or control group, consequently, his findings may have been unconsciously influenced by his own expectations.
-Theory Validity
Many of the 44 thieves in Bowlby;s study had been moved around a lot during childhood, and had probably never formed an attachment. This suggested that they were suffering from privation, rather than deprivation
-Reliability
Recalling memories from the past regarding their upbringings may not always be accurate.
Strange Situation procedure
Mother and child shown to room and child shown toys to play with
Mother is nonparticipant while the child explores.
Stranger enters the room and tries to interact with the child
(First separation) Mother leaves the room so child is left with the stranger, stranger tries to interact with child
(First reunion) Mother reuters, comforts the child and the stranger leaves
(Second separation) The mother leaves, the child is left alone
The stranger reuters and tries to interact and console the child
(Second reunion) The mother returns and greets the child, stranger leaves.
Experiment was a controlled observation
About 100 middle-class American infants and their mothers participated in the strange situation.
Observations were recorded every 15 seconds and placed into behavioural categories (i.e. smiling, crying, moving towards or away from mother)
Mindfulness ao1
being in control of your emotions and thoughts. improves wellbeing, focuses on nurturing positive emotions, helps manage stress and anxiety
+Mindfulness
no side effect, crane et al used it to deal with stress
-mindfulness
can bring back traumatic memory, isnt originally developed for mental illness
Aim of Ainsworth strange situation
develop bowlby’s idea of creating a way of measuring the attachment style of an infant
Situation of ainsworth strange situation
mother and infant
stranger in, mother out
mother in, stranger out
baby alone
stranger in
mother in, stranger out
Findings of Ainsworth strange situation
Secure = 66% (textbook stats: 70%)
Insecure Avoidant = 22% (textbook stats: 20%)
Insecure Resistant = 12% (textbook stats: 10%)
+Ainsworth strange situation
The Strange Situation provides a controlled and standardized way to assess attachment, fostering reliable research and comparisons. It offers valuable insights into early parent-child relationships and their potential impact on later
-Ainsworth Strange Situation
- ecol val - mothers demand characteristics, knows she is being observed
- validity, separation can vary in different cultures
some critics argue that the procedure can be overly stressful for infants and may not capture the full complexity of attachment dynamics in real-world settings.
Aim of Erikson
Build upon Freuds theory by drawing parallels in childhood and expanding it to include the influence of social dynamic
Stages of Piaget
sensori motor= child interacts with environment
pre operational= use language and symbols, bases knowledge on what they sense to be true but do not know why
concrete operational= knowledge through concrete knowledge
formal operational= abstract reasoning, able to think logically
+Piaget
generated huge research increasing our understanding.
practical use in understanding and communication with children (educational field)
-Piaget
some of his findings were confusing or hard to understand
small sample only composed of European children with high socioeconomic status
some argue that there are no stages and that its a continuous process
Bowlby’s 44 thieves aim
investigate the long term effects of maternal deprivation on peoples live in order to see if delinquents have suffered deprivation
Bowlby’s 44 thieves procedure
Opportunity sample of 88 children selected from a detention centre.
Of these, 44 were juvenile thieves (31 boys & 13 girls) because of their stealing
Bowlby selected a control group of 44 children (34 boys & 10 girls) with emotional problems but no crimes.
Each child had their IQ tested by a psychologist who assessed their emotional attitudes towards the test.
The two groups were matched for age and IQ
The children and parents were interviewed by three people in separate reports regarding the details of the child’s early life
Findings of Bowlby’s 44 thieves
14 children from the thief group were identified as affectionless psychopaths (they were unable to care about or feel affection for others).
12 had experienced prolonged separation of more than 6 months from their mothers in their very first years of life - critical period.
Out of the 44 children in the control group only two experienced prolonged separations, and none were affectionless psychopaths,
+Bowlby’s 44 thieves
- privacy maintained
- bufulco studied 250 women who had lost mother before 17, found it doubles risk of depression and anxiety
-Bowlby’s 44 thieves
he diagnosed with affectionless psychopathy (long term labelling)
- michael rutter said its privation, deprivation is the loss or damage to attatchment
Skinner ao1
language is learnt
shaping- + reinforcement for anything that sounds remotely to the word, practice until is correct
babbling- sounds to only obtain something
positive punishment- stop learning incorrect words by sayinf ‘no’ ‘stop’
+Skinner
feral children raised by dogs in the forest until 7, imitate actions and language
-Skinner
over simplistic, ignores learning erroes, doesnt explain children who frequently make grammatical errors
Aim of O’ Connor aim
To what extent a parent intervention programme promotes change in a parent-child relationship, (To investigate whether or not the child-parent relationship can be improved by social learning theory based on attachment theory with intervention)
O’ Connor ppts
174, 4-6 yrs children from 24 classes in 4 primary schools in an urban area in London.
O’ Connor procedure
Random sampling method gathered 174, 4-6 year old children from 24 classes in 4 primary schools in an urban area in London.
Study test type had repeated measures and was longitudinal for 3 years (2001-2004.)
Informed consent was received from the parents and the local research ethics committee also gave approval for the study.
Children were randomly allocated to the intervention condition (88) with several parenting programs, and non-intervention condition (86)
Intervention was a 12-week parenting program done through observation and group discussion.
Parents were taught new parenting techniques to apply at home.
6-week literacy program with techniques such as ‘pause-prompt-praise’ approach when children learn new words.
Observations of parent-child interactions were carried out pre & post treatment. All observations were videotaped for further coding.
Post treatment had In-home observations of parent–child interactions and was assessed in three tasks by 2 researchers:
Free play: 10 mins session with no instructions given by observers.
Challenge tasks: 20 minute instructed challenge
Tidy up: 5 min session where minimal instructions given to parents.
Observers rated each of the 3 tasks noting down if there was a positive or negative parenting style. Based on ‘sensitive responding’ which is the extent to which parents showed awareness to the child’s needs and signs, and ‘Mutuality’ where the parents corporation was observed.
Results of O’ Connor
improvements in sensitive training. Parents in the intervention condition showed a higher number of positive behavioural changes and increased sensitive responding compared to the non-intervention control group.
+O’ Connor
informed consent, applies to real world in promoting +behaviour in children
-O’ Connor
low generalizable, young people from high need areas in London
not distinguish the role of reading interaction and whether this has any impact
Punch ao1
used an ethnographic approach to gather the data
lived with a family
5 task based methods to collect qualitative data, photos, diaries, drawings
how young people negotiate constraints over their choices
+Punch
increase internal validity, fluent in local language
observation during play, at school, freetime= real world appreciation
-Punch
data= emic approach
culturally bias- may not improve and for all cultures
based on punch experiences, not replicable
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg ao1
believed that patterns of attachment might be better understood if a large set of data was examined
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg ppts
32 studies from 8 different countries
1990 children smaller than 24 months
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg findings
insecure avoidant= least common, 3% uk, 30% israel
insecure resistant= germany- most common. japan- least common
+Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
many studies, shows consistency of results, replicable
-Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
wrong to assume that in all cultures everyone has the same practices, western culture studies
Vygotsky ao1
ZPD= more knowledgeable help
allows for children to take a different role that they would not have in real life
learn from problem solving
Vygotsky believes
developmental depends on social and cultural factors- knowledge is socially constructed
+Vygotsky
- nichols found that high school students who worked in groups were more motivated
- berk found 6yr olds spend 60% time talking to themselves while doing maths - performed better
-Vygotsky
- ignores biological and individual factors, expected to learn faster if only social interactions
- vague, what kind of social interactions more beneficial
Chomsky ao1
Language is innate (LAD in brain)
Learn language like we learn to walk
agreed with skinner- reinforcement
must learn native language before critical period 11 or we cant speak fluently
+Chomsky
skinner agrees, study B, more ppts and more modern
-Chomsky
lacks testability, cant open brain
reductionist, only focuses on individual and developmental
Cassiba aim
test the universality of attachment theory in a meta- analysis comparing italian samples to standard studies
Cassiba ppts
italian studies 1990-2009
17 ssp compared to us samples 50 aai
Cassiba finding
Shows cross cultural similarities in terms of secure attachment
+Cassiba
looks at both clinical and non clinical studies
publication bias avoided, unpublished studies included
-Cassiba
ethnographic, only compared with american children, reflect US terms, based on interview data, bias ppts
Vygotsky interactionalist approach ao1
relies on child- mko interactions
learn through scaffolding
mko frequent conversations
child more confident= more independent
+Vygotsky interactionalist approach
real life applies, teachers use scaffolding, new terminology, place them with more able peers
-Vygotsky interactionalist approach
reductionist, relies to a heavy on IA
genie failed to learn language before critical period
Attachment theory
Focus on the emotional bond formed between infants and their caregivers. Emphasis on how these early relationship can shape an individual’s social and emotional development, influencing their ability to form relationship later in life.
According to Bowlby infants have a universal need to seek close proximity with their caregiver when under stress or threatened - supported by harlow 1958 (monkey love experiment)
Stages of Attachment Procedure
studying 60 babies at monthly intervals for the first 18 months of life (longitudinal study).
The children were all studied at home, and a consistent pattern in attachment development was discovered.
For around a year, the newborns were visited monthly, their interactions with their caretakers were monitored, and the carers were questioned.
The mother kept a diary in order to investigate the evidence for attachment development. Three measurements were taken:
Stranger Anxiety - response to arrival of a stranger.
Separation Anxiety - distress level when separated from carer, degree of comfort needed on return.
Social Referencing - degree that a child looks at a carer to check how they should respond to something new (secure base). How curious the child becomes.
Stages of Attachment Findings
sensitive responsiveness is important in attachment.
Intensely attached infants had mothers who responded quickly to their demands and interacted with their child. Infants who were weakly attached had mothers who failed to interact.
The most important fact in forming attachments is not who feeds and changes the child but who plays and communicates with him or her. Therefore, sensitive responsiveness to the baby's signals, appeared to be the key to attachment.
Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis
Bowlby’s evolutionary theory of attachment suggests that children come into the world biologically pre-programmed to form attachments with others for survival.
Bowlby argued that a child forms many attachments, but one of these is qualitatively different. This is what he called primary attachment, Monotropy.
Bowlby suggests that there is a critical period for developing attachment (2.5 years). If an attachment has not developed during this time period, then it may not happen at all.
Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis suggests that continual attachment disruption between the infant and primary caregiver could result in long-term cognitive, social and emotional difficulties for that infant.
Consequences of maternal deprivation: An inability to form attachments in the future (see the Internal Working Model)
Affectionless psychopathy (inability to feel remorse)
Delinquency (behavioural problems in adolescence)
Problems with Cognitive Development
Bowlby believed that disrupting this primary relationship could lead to a lighter incidence of juvenile delinquency. Emotional difficulties, and antisocial behaviour. To test his hypothesis, he studied 44 adolescent juvenile delinquents in a child guidance clinic.
44 Juvenile thieves study (1944
44 Juvenile Thieves study (1944) | |
AIM | To investigate the long-term effects of maternal deprivation on people to see whether delinquents have suffered deprivation. |
PROCEDURE |
|
FINDINGS |
|
CONCLUSION |
|
Evaluation of John Bowlby’s study
Aim of O’ Connor et al. (2013)
To investigate whether or not the child parent relationship can be improved by social learning theory based on attachment theory with intervention
Procedure of O’Connor
Random sampling method gathered 174, 4-6 year old children from 24 classes in 4 primary schools in an urban area in London.
Study test type had repeated measures and was longitudinal for 3 years (2001-2004.)
Informed consent was received from the parents and the local research ethics committee also gave approval for the study.
Children were randomly allocated to the intervention condition (88) with several parenting programs, and non-intervention condition (86)
Intervention was a 12-week parenting program done through observation and group discussion.
Parents were taught new parenting techniques to apply at home.
6-week literacy program with techniques such as ‘pause-prompt-praise’ approach when children learn new words.
Observations of parent-child interactions were carried out pre & post treatment. All observations were videotaped for further coding.
Post treatment had In-home observations of parent–child interactions and was assessed in three tasks by 2 researchers:
Free play: 10 mins session with no instructions given by observers.
Challenge tasks: 20 minute instructed challenge
Tidy up: 5 min session where minimal instructions given to parents.
Observers rated each of the 3 tasks noting down if there was a positive or negative parenting style. Based on ‘sensitive responding’ which is the extent to which parents showed awareness to the child’s needs and signs, and ‘Mutuality’ where the parents corporation was observed.
Results and Conclusion of O’ Connor
R= Parents in the intervention condition showed a higher number of positive behavioural changes and increased sensitive responding compared to the non-intervention control group
C= Standard social learning theory based interventions can change aspects of parent-child relationship quality, as proven by the study results.
Evaluation of O’ Connor et al. (2013)
Ainsworth’s theory of attachment (The Strange Situation)
Method devised by Mary Ainsworth in the 1970s to observe attachment security in children within the context of caregiver relationships.
Infants (the child) were between the age of 9 and 18 months.
Procedure involves a series of eight episodes lasting approximately 3 minutes each, whereby a mother, child, and stranger are introduced, separated, and reunited.
Two observers were present in this
Procedure of Strange situation
Mother and child shown to room and child shown toys to play with
Mother is nonparticipant while the child explores.
Stranger enters the room and tries to interact with the child
(First separation) Mother leaves the room so child is left with the stranger, stranger tries to interact with child
(First reunion) Mother reuters, comforts the child and the stranger leaves
(Second separation) The mother leaves, the child is left alone
The stranger reuters and tries to interact and console the child
(Second reunion) The mother returns and greets the child, stranger leaves.
Experiment was a controlled observation
About 100 middle-class American infants and their mothers participated in the strange situation.
Observations were recorded every 15 seconds and placed into behavioural categories (i.e. smiling, crying, moving towards or away from mother)
Attachment theory (include 3 main attachment style)
Attachment theory, initially developed by John Bowlby, posits that infants are born with an innate tendency to form emotional bonds or attachments to their caregivers. These early attachments are believed to be critical for the child's emotional and social development.
Ainsworth (1970) identified three main attachment styles, Secure, Insecure avoidant, and insecure ambivalent. She concluded that these attachment styles resulted from early interactions with the mother.
Secure Attachment: Children with secure attachments showed distress when separated from their caregivers but were easily comforted upon reunion. These children had caregivers who were consistently sensitive to their needs.
Insecure-Avoidant Attachment: Children with insecure-avoidant attachments appeared indifferent to their caregiver's absence and return. These children often had caregivers who were unresponsive or dismissive of their needs.
Insecure-Ambivalent/Resistant Attachment: Children with insecure-ambivalent attachments displayed intense distress upon separation and were difficult to comfort upon reunion. These children often had caregivers who were inconsistently responsive.
Caregiver Sensitivity Hypothesis (Ainsworth)
Ainsworth's caregiver sensitivity hypothesis posits that the quality of the attachment bond between an infant and their caregiver is largely influenced by the caregiver's ability to respond to the infant's needs in a sensitive and consistent manner.
Secure Attachment and Caregiver Sensitivity:
children with secure attachments had caregivers who were consistently sensitive and responsive to their needs.
Suggests that; sensitive caregivers = securely attached children
Insecure Attachments and Caregiver Sensitivity:
Children with insecure attachments often had caregivers who were less sensitive and consistent in responding to their needs.
Suggests that; less sensitive caregivers = insecure attached children
Evaluation of The Strange Situation
Reliability Standardised procedure following the same steps and timings for each child, hence making it replicable. Since observations were made every 15 seconds it allows the observer to tally observations into pre-arranged groupings, it also makes the observation replicable. So the results have greater reliability. | Generalisability & Population Validity Original study used American infants from middle-class families, Hence due to the cultural bias, it cannot be generalised to other populations and cultures, who might behave differently towards their children & have different expectations. The study in Germany found, parents encourage independence in their children, so they are less likely to show enthusiastic reunion behaviour than children from other cultures. |
Internal Validity Due to the use of a controlled condition, she could control many of the factors within her experiment. Ainsworth used the same stranger throughout the whole study, and the amount of time spent with and without the child was also controlled, hence making it more reliable and accurate. | Ecological/External Validity Unfamiliar situation and surrounding, hence the child may be reacting to this rather than the mother leaving. Artificial setting that has been staged with precise timings as to who enters when. However in real life, that may not be the case. |
Sroufe (1983) Found that children showing secure attachments at the age of 2 were more popular, showing more initiative, having higher self- esteem, being less aggressive and being social leaders. | Unethical Children were put under stress (separation & stranger anxiety), the study has broken the ethical guideline protection of participants. |
Validity The study provided empirical evidence to support the caregiver sensitivity hypothesis hence resulting in it being highly reliable and valid. | Validity Does not take into account individual differences or that the children had more experience of being separated from the mother (e.g; day care) |
Def. Cross- cultural Research
Cross Cultural Research is when the same procedure from one culture is used in another culture in order to make comparisons on behaviour. If the same behaviour is found across multiple cultures it would suggest the behaviour is universal/ innate. However, if differences in behaviour is found it could suggest the behaviour is culture specific and cannot be generalised to all cultures.
The Strange Situation procedure used in diff cultures
Experimenter | Country | Secure | Insecure Resistant | Insecure Avoidant |
Ainsworth | USA | 66% | 22% | 12% |
Sagi | Israel | 37% | 50% | 13% |
Grossman | Germany | 33% | 18% | 49% |
Miyake | Japan | 68% | 32% | 0% |
Israel: Childcare is shared and children are raised by fosters. This explains the high levels of insecure resistant types as caregivers are often absent and cannot provide individual attention.
Germany: Independence is valued and encouraged in children. From a young age they are taught to not depend on anyone. Germans are an individualistic culture.
Japan: Children are rarely left alone without their mother and encouraged to depend on her. Avoidant behaviour is considered rude in Japanese culture.
Evaluation of Strange Situation Cross cultural
EVALUATION
Validity & Reliability The strange Situation is a standardised procedure and the same method was replicated in different cultures, hence results are reliable. | Generalizability & Validity Sample sizes & participants (family backgrounds etc) are different in the different cultures. Hence comparisons and conclusions are hard to make. |
Theory Validity There was a consistency in that all cultures showed the same general attachment types, secure attachment being the main attachment type. | External Validity Number of variables that might affect findings in different cultures, and therefore it is difficult to draw any conclusions in general. |
Mention the 3 theories of cognitive development
Vygotsky's zone of proximal development (ZPD)
Piaget's stages of cognitive and language development
stages of language development
theories of language: learning including Skinner; nativist including Chomsky's language acquisition device (LAD); interactionist including Vygotsky.
Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development (ZPD)
The zone of proximal development (ZPD) refers to the difference between what a learner can do without help and what he or she can achieve with guidance and encouragement from a skilled partner.
ZPD is the zone where instruction is the most beneficial.
To learn, tasks that are out of our ability range should be presented, as challenging tasks promotie maximum cognitive growth.
To assist someone through the ZPD, it is encouraged to focus on the three components which aid the learning process:
More Knowledgeable Other (MKO) - presence of someone with more knowledge and skills beyond that of the learner.
Social Interactions - through social interactions with a skillful tutor who models behaviours and or provides verbal instructions for the child, who then internalises the information using it to guide their own performance.
Scaffolding - consists of the activities provided by the educator. Or a more competent peer, to support the student as he or she is led through the ZPD.
Piaget’s Stages of Cognitive Developmental Theory
STAGE | PERIOD | DETAILS |
STAGE 1: THE | Learn about their environment through their senses and motor activities. This stage has 6 substages as follows: | |
Use of Reflexes | ABILITIES:
DIFFICULTIES:
| |
Primary Circular Reactions | ABILITIES:
| |
Secondary circular reactions (4-8 months) | ABILITIES:
| |
Coordination Of Secondary Schemes (8-12 months) | ABILITIES:
| |
Tertiary Circular Reactions (12-18 months) | ABILITIES:
| |
Mental Combination (18-24 months) | ABILITIES:
| |
STAGE 2: THE | (2 - 7 Years) | ABILITIES:
DIFFICULTIES:
|
STAGE 3: THE | (7 - 11 Years) | ABILITIES:
|
STAGE 4: THE | (11 Years - Adulthood) | ABILITIES:
|
Stages of Language Development
Language acquisition
Language acquisition refers to the process by which individuals learn and develop their native or second language.
It involves the acquisition of grammar, vocabulary, and communication skills through exposure, interaction, and cognitive development.
Skinner: Behavioral Theory (Based on Operant conditioning and Social learning Theory)
Skinner believed that children learn language through operant conditioning; (positive reinforcement) learning that uses rewards and punishments to modify and reproduce behaviour where a child receives positive reinforcement for appropriate noises and vocalisations.
Skinner believed that the ‘babbling’ and ‘cooing’ of babies may be innate.
Skinner also suggested that children learn language through imitation of others. prompting, and shaping.
He argued that language is a result of external stimuli and reinforcement, emphasising the role of the environment in shaping linguistic behaviour.
Social learning theory: Listening to (attention and retention) and then imitating (reproduction) the words and grammar of role models (parents, siblings, friends) is also considered as an explanation for language development. social learning would occur if the following criteria were met:
Attention: Attention must be paid to the role model for learning to take place.
Retention: Individuals must be able to retain or store the behaviour they have observed so that they can easily recall and reproduce the behaviour.
Reproduction: Involves showing of the modelled behaviour.
Chomsky: Nativist Theory (Based on Language Acquisition Device (LAD) and Universal Grammar)
“Children have an innate pre-programming to understand language”
Noam Chomsky believed that every child has a Language Acquisition Device (LAD) which is a hypothetical tool in the human brain that lets children learn and understand language quickly.
He also argued that there are Universal Grammar principles that guide language development across cultures, and languages, suggesting that language acquisition is driven by innate linguistic knowledge rather than solely by environmental factors.
Piaget: Cognitive Theory (Based on Assimilation and Accommodation)
Jean Piaget’s theory of language development suggests that children use both assimilation & accommodation to learn language
Assimilation is the process of changing one’s environment to place information into an already existing schema
Accommodation is the process of changing one’s schema to adapt to the new environment.
Schemas are pre existing packets of information about an object or event.
Piaget believed that children need to first develop cognitive faculties before language development can occur. This development takes place over four stages: sensorimotor, preoperational , concrete operational and formal operational.
According to him, children first create mental structures within the mind (schemas) and from these schemas, language development happens.