2 Ch 12 Photon Beam Dosimetry

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/75

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

76 Terms

1
New cards

other terms for incident dose

dose to Dmax; given dose

2
New cards

ID

incident dose, aka dose to Dmax or given dose

3
New cards

incident dose (aka dose to Dmax or given dose) depends on ___ and ___

beam energy and field size

4
New cards

the primary photon beam also has some low energy ___ and ___ produced by the beam hitting the ___ which adds to dose

electrons and photons; collimators/filters/etc.

5
New cards

larger field sizes produce more or less scatter?

more

6
New cards

why does Dmax change a little bit with larger field sizes? how does the effect change at lower energies?

larger fields produce more scatter. scatter consists of lower energy photons and electrons that deposit their energy on the skin, which skews the ratio and effectively decreases the depth of Dmax.

less of a problem at lower energies

7
New cards

SAD

source to axis distance

8
New cards

D

dose at depth

9
New cards

CR

central ray

10
New cards

F.s.

field size

11
New cards

in higher energy beams, what is greater, the surface dose or the exist dose?

exit dose

12
New cards

a dose increment (usually daily)

fraction

13
New cards

number of fractions and time sequence in which the total dose is given

fractionation schedule

14
New cards

when 2 smaller fractions are given twice per day over a normal time frame, creating a higher total dose (each dose is a little more than just dividing the daily dose in half)

hyperfractionation

15
New cards

when 2 normal fractions are given twice per day, for the same total dose but protraction cut in half

accelerated fractionation

16
New cards

when the total dose is given over a shorter time frame (ex. Canadian breast study)

hypofractionation - i.e. lots of breast is now 5 or 16 fractions

17
New cards

BSF

backscatter factor

18
New cards

OF

output factor

19
New cards

DD or PDD

depth dose, or percentage depth dose

20
New cards

TAR

tissue-air ratio

21
New cards

TMR

tissue-maximum ratio

22
New cards

examples of equipment attenuation factors

block trays, table, pads

23
New cards

examples of patient attenuation factors

DD or PDD

TAR

TMR

24
New cards

radiation that is scattered back by the patient (or phantom)

backscatter factor (BSF)

25
New cards

BSF =

BSF = dose at Dmax in phantom / dose without backscatter (dose in air)

top number is always higher, because dose to Dmax (aka incident dose) is higher because of scatter, meaning BSF is always over 1

26
New cards

backscatter factor (BSF) is always over ___, up to about ___ for larger field sizes

1.0; 1.5

27
New cards

why is BSF not used in linac treatment calculations?

it’s highest for orthovoltage x-rays. less important for linacs with higher energy.

28
New cards

BSF varies with ___

beam energy

29
New cards

at lower energies, ___ and ___ don’t contribute much to surface dose (types of photon interactions)

coherent scatter and photoelectric effect

30
New cards

as beam energy increases, ____ (type of photon interaction) predominates at the skin surface. therefore, backscatter increases with energy up to a point.

Compton effect

31
New cards

scatter becomes more ___ as energy increases, and more ___ as field size increases

forward; prevalent

32
New cards

above 2 MeV, virtually all scatter is in the ___ direction and BSF would now be called ___ with a value of ___

forward; peak scatter factor (PSF); 1.0

33
New cards

PSF

peak scatter factor

replaces BSF above 2 MeV

34
New cards

output factor (OF) is measured in ___ for low energy photons and Co-60, and in ___ for high energy machines

R/min; cGy/MU

35
New cards

the larger the field size, the ___ the output factor (OF)

greater

36
New cards

OF =

dose at Dmax for f.s. (the one you’re using) / dose at Dmax for a standard f.s. (10 × 10)

37
New cards

the O.F for a 10 Ă— 10 field will always be ___, for less than 10 Ă— 10 field will be ____ than 1, and for greater than 10 Ă— 10 field will be ___ than 1

1.0; less than 1; greater than 1

38
New cards

the reason the output factor changes is because of ___

scatter

39
New cards

ESF

equivalent square fields

40
New cards

three methods to find equivalent square fields

  1. chart

  2. ESF = 4 x A/P

  3. 2 (WxL)/W + L

41
New cards

how is the equipment attenuation factor written in the MU calculation formula?

Cattn

42
New cards

Cattn

Cattn = dose with device in beam / dose without device in beam

43
New cards

what is the only thing that affects the equipment attenuation factor (Cattn)

beam energy

44
New cards

the equipment attenuation factor, Cattn, is always ___

below 1.0

if the factor is .97, that means the device attenuates 3% of the beam

45
New cards

patient attenuation factors depend on these 4 things

beam energy

field size

treatment depth

sometimes distance (SSD)

46
New cards

all patient attenuation factors (TAR, TMR, PDD) will ___ with increase in energy and field size (scatter) and ___ with increase in depth (attenuation)

increase; decrease

47
New cards

PDD =

PDD = dose at treatment depth / dose at Dmax

48
New cards

how does PDD change with depth, field size, energy, and SSD?

depth = indirect relationship (increase/decrease)

field size, energy, and SSD = direct relationship (increase/increase)

49
New cards

PDD is only used for what type of calculations?

SSD

(because with SAD/isocentric, the whole point is that dose is 100% at the depth we’re treating)

50
New cards

on a PDD chart (relating depth and beam energy to find PDD), the PDD for each energy is always 100% at

Dmax

51
New cards

MU calculation formula for SSD treatment

  • Nmu =  ______TD_______

           Ccal  x Cfs  x  Cattn  x PDD

TD = tumor dose (divided by number of fields)

Ccal = calibration factor of machine; 1.0 unless told otherwise

Cfs = OF field size correction factor (look up on table)

Cattn = equipment attenuation factors (not always used)

PDD = look up on table

52
New cards

what would the MU calculation equation look like for a single field, 180 cGy, with blocks (TF = .97), Cfs = 1.03, PDD = 88%

Nmu = _______180_______

               1.03 x .97 x .88   


53
New cards

for an extended SSD MU calculation, what factors would you have to add to the equation?

ISL correction factor (in denominator) and Mayneord factor (multiply MF by PDD to correct the PDD for the problem)

ISL cf = (SSD1 + Dmax)2 / (SSD2 + Dmax)2

54
New cards

ID =

ID = TD / DD

(incident dose = total dose / depth dose or PDD)

so if total dose is 204.5 cGy, but the tumor is getting 88% of the dose, it gets 180 cGy

55
New cards

ratio of dose in phantom to dose in air

TAR = dose at depth in phantom at SAD / dose without phantom at SAD (dose in air)

56
New cards

tissue-air ratio (TAR) is NOT dependent on ___, and is used for ___ calculations at low energy

SSD; SAD

57
New cards

TAR = BSF at ___

Dmax

58
New cards

backscatter factor (BSF) can only be used for the depth of ___, whereas TAR can be used for any depth

Dmax

59
New cards

TAR was invented for ___ calculations, so we won’t be using them

TAR

60
New cards

the most commonly used patient attenuation factor in dose calculations

tissue maximum ratio (TMR)

because it’s used for SAD/isocentric technique, which is most modern treatments

61
New cards

TMR

tissue maximum ratio

62
New cards

TMR is only used for what kind of calculations?

SAD/isocentric technique

63
New cards

is TMR dependent on SSD?

no

64
New cards

TMR =

TMR = dose at depth / dose at Dmax (ratio of dose at tumor to maximum dose)

65
New cards

equation that relates BSF, TAR, and TMR

BSF = TAR/TMR

66
New cards

equation for MU calculations for SAD/isocentric technique

  • MU =  ______TD___________

             Ccal  x  Cfs   x Catt  x TMR  x  SADcf 

    TD = tumor dose (needs to be divided by number of fields)

    Ccal = calibration factor, 1 unless told otherwise

    Cfs = OF field size correction factor (look up on table)

    Catt = equipment attenuation factors

    TMR = will be told

    SADcf = SAD factor, a constant for each energy. (SAD = Dmax)2 / (SAD)2

67
New cards

is SADcf a constant?

yes, a constant for each energy

6 MV = (100+1.5)2 / 1002 = 1.03

10 MV = 1.05

68
New cards

what would the MU calculation look like for an SAD treatment, single field, 200 cGy, 10 Ă— 10 cm fs, no blocks, 6 MV (=1.03 SADcf), TMR = 0.8 (look up in appendix 5)

200 / 0.8 Ă— 1.03

69
New cards

isodose curves are lines that represent areas of equal ___

depth dose, or percent depth dose

70
New cards

when looking at isodose curves, lower energies have greater ___ and the size of each isodose area is ___

penumbra; larger

71
New cards

constancy of intensity across the beam (80% of the beam width, because of penumbra)

flatness

72
New cards

intensity difference between opposite sides of the beam

symmetry

73
New cards

the field width/beam edge is defined at the ___% intensity line

50%

74
New cards

the smaller the field, the ___ the flatness

poorer (because of less scatter)

75
New cards

on a dose profile, higher intensity regions beneath the thin edge of the flattening filter

horns / ears

76
New cards

graph that shows flatness and symmetry of the beam

dose profile