6 - Minority Influence

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/39

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

40 Terms

1
New cards

Minority Influence

occurs when consistent, confident individuals or groups challenge prevailing paradigms and views.

  • This proves that even a few can shape the beliefs of many

2
New cards

Serge Moscovici

developed the Conversion Theory which challenged the idea that change only comes from within the majority.

3
New cards

Conversion Theory

a model explaining how consistent minorities influence majorities by promoting deep cognitive processing and private acceptance

  • unlike majority influence which produces only surface compliace.

4
New cards
  • Comparison Process (Majority Influence)

  • Validation Process (Minority Influence)

Two Processes of Influence:

5
New cards

Comparison Process (Majority Influence)

People publicly conform with a majority group, driven by a need to fit in.

  • This results in compliance that is direct, immediate, but not temporary.

6
New cards

Validation Process (Minority Influence)

The minority draws attention by breaking unanimity. Members then carefully reconsider their arguments.

  • Leads to conversion, an indirect, delayed, and durable change.

7
New cards

Delayed Social Influence

This refers to a time-lagged change in a person’s private opinion or attitude that happens after being exposed to a minority’s message, even if there was no immediate public agreement.

Example:

  • A student disagrees with a classmate’s idea about using solar energy but changes their mind days later after reflecting on the points made.

8
New cards

Idiosyncrasy Credits

explaining that members who have earned trust or status through positive contributions gain “credits” that allow them to disagree or go against the group without being rejected.

9
New cards

Idiosyncrasy Credits

Example:

  • A team leader who has consistently helped the group succeed suggests a new, unusual strategy. Even if others disagree, they listen instead of rejecting the idea because the leader has earned ____________ through past contributions.

10
New cards
  • Unanimity Rules

  • Majority Rules

Decision Rules and Dissent: (2)

11
New cards

Unanimity rules

(everyone must agree) enhances minority power

12
New cards

Majority Rules

weaken minority influence, since the group can ignore dissent.

13
New cards

Dynamic Social Impact Theory

stating that influence depends on the strength, immediacy, and number of sources

14
New cards
  • Consolidation

  • Clustering

  • Correlation

  • Continuing diversity

Over time, repeated interactions within groups lead to: (4)

15
New cards

Consolidation

As individuals interact with one another regularly, their actions, attitudes, and opinions become more uniform.

16
New cards

Clustering

As the law of social impact suggests, people are more influenced by their closest neighbors, so clusters of group members with similar opinions emerge in groups.

17
New cards
  • Implicit influence

  • Informational influence

  • Normative influence

  • Interpersonal influence

Sources of Group Influence:

(4) I-I-N-I

18
New cards

Implicit Influence

Unconscious and automatic cognitive, emotional, or behavioral reactions to others, rather than deliberate responses.

19
New cards

Mimicry

The unconscious imitation of others’ behaviors, such as copying gestures or speech patterns.

20
New cards

Mindlessness

A state of reduced awareness where actions are based on habit or routine instead of conscious thought.

21
New cards

Implicit Influence

You start feeling anxious because others around you look worried, even though no one says anything.

22
New cards

Mimicry

You unconsciously cross your arms or smile after the person you’re talking to does.

23
New cards

Mindlessness

In Ellen Langer’s photocopier experiment, people waiting in line were more likely to let someone cut ahead just because that person gave a reason—even a meaningless one like, “Can I use the copier because I need to make copies?”

24
New cards

Informational Influence

Change-promoting interpersonal processes that are based on the informational value of the responses of others in the situation.

  • During a fire drill, you’re unsure where to go, so you follow others who seem to know the way.

25
New cards

Social Comparison

The tendency to evaluate our beliefs, abilities, or opinions by comparing them with those of others to judge accuracy or self-worth

  • A student compares their test score with classmates to see if they did well.

26
New cards

False Consensus Effect

The tendency to overestimate how much others share our beliefs or behaviors, assuming our views are more common than they actually are.

  • Someone who skips breakfast assumes most people do the same because they think it’s normal.

27
New cards

Dual Process Theories of Influence

Explain that influence occurs through two routes:

  • Direct processes

  • Indirect processes

28
New cards

Direct processes

involve rational thinking and analysis (e.g., persuasion, discussion)

29
New cards

Indirect processes

rely on automatic or emotional responses (e.g., imitation, herding).

30
New cards

Dual Process Theories of Influence

You carefully analyze a friend’s argument about healthy eating (direct process), but also start eating healthier just because everyone else does (indirect process).

31
New cards

Heuristic

A mental shortcut or rule of thumb used to make quick judgments when information is limited or unclear.

  • You assume a product is good because it’s expensive — using the shortcut “price equals quality.”

32
New cards

Cascade

A rapid shift in opinions spreading through a group after people observe others changing their views.

33
New cards

Cascade

Example (Russell Clark’s Study):

In jury simulations, observers’ decisions shifted after each round of voting, showing how one person’s changed opinion can trigger a cascade that influences the whole group.

34
New cards

Normative Influence

When people change their behavior or attitudes to fit group norms, standards, or expectations in order to be liked or accepted

  • A student laughs at a joke they don’t find funny just to fit in with friends.

35
New cards

Cognitive Dissonance

The uncomfortable feeling that occurs when a person’s beliefs and actions conflict, motivating them to restore consistency.

  • A person who values honesty feels uncomfortable after lying and tries to justify it to reduce the tension.

36
New cards

Focus Theory of Normative Conduct

Explains that descriptive norms (what most people do) and injunctive norms (what people approve of) influence behavior when they are brought to attention or made salient.

Example:

  • People are more likely to throw trash in a bin when a sign reminds them, “Most people here keep the area clean.”

37
New cards

Interpersonal Influence

Occurs when group members encourage conformity and discourage or punish nonconformity, sometimes using pressure or rejection to make others follow group norms.

Example:

  • A group pressures a member to agree with their plan and criticizes them for suggesting a different idea.

38
New cards

Interpersonal Rejection

When a group excludes or ignores someone who goes against group norms.

Example:

  • Classmates stop including a student who constantly disagrees with the group’s opinions.

39
New cards

Black-Sheep Effect

The tendency for people to judge a deviant ingroup member more harshly than an outsider who behaves the same way.

Example:

  • A student from your own school cheats on a test, and you judge them more harshly than a student from another school who did the same.

40
New cards

Bystander Effect

The tendency for people to be less likely to help in an emergency when others are present. The larger the group, the less personal responsibility each person feels, due to diffusion of responsibility—the belief that someone else will help.