1/69
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Civil Liberties
personal guarantees and freedoms the government cannot abridge
Limitations on government's power
restrain or dictate individual actions
Civil Rights
provide freedom from arbitrary discriminatory treatment by government
Decision on whether to add a bill of rights
Anti-Federalists stressed need for bill of rights, notion of adding a bill of rights in the Constitution was unpopular or seen as unnecessary at the Convention, republic was founded on popular sovereignty and inalienable natural rights and most states had bill of rights in their constitutions, seen as dangerous since the national government had enumerated powers, impractical, validity would depend on public opinion and the government
Founding Fathers' acceptance of the bill of rights
Jefferson supported the bill of rights quickly, Madison was reluctant at first, but issued public letters, vowing to support a bill of rights for a seat in the House in a largely Anti-Federalist district in a race against Monroe, eventually was primary author for Bill of Rights, still seeing it as a less important project, Congress acted quickly, fearing political instability
Bill of Rights
first ten amendments, guaranteeing specific rights and liberties
Ninth Amendment
guarantees enumerating rights in the Constitution or Bill of Rights does not mean others do not exist
Tenth Amendment
defines basic principle of American federalism, stating powers not delegated to the national government are reserved to states/people
Barron v Baltimore
Bill of Rights applied to US government actions only
language of Fourteenth Amendment suggests
protections might prevent state infringement on individual rights
Due Process Clause
clause in 5th and 14th Amendments, guaranteeing variety of rights
Substantive Due Process
judicial interpretation of 5th and 14th Amendments that due process clauses protect citizens from arbitrary or unjust state/federal laws
Gitlow v. New York (1925)
Socialist Gitlow printed a manifesto, urging workers to overthrow the government, convicted for violating a New York state law, but the Court decided states are not completely free to limit political expression even though they had been prosecuting individuals for seditious speech
Incorporation Doctrine
interpretation of Constitution holding due process clause of 14th Amendment requires state and local governments to guarantee the rights stated in the Bill of Rights
Selective Incorporation
judicial doctrine whereby most protections in the Bill of Rights are made applicable to states (press, speech, assembly, etc)
First Amendment
imposes a number of restrictions on the federal government with respect to civil liberties (freedom of speech, press, assembly and petition)
establishment clause
directs the national government not to sanction an official religion
free exercise clause
prohibits government from interfering with a citizen's right to practice his or her religion
Engel v. Vitale (1962)
Court ruled recitation in public school classrooms of a brief nondenominational prayer drafted by local school board was unconsitutional
when secular law conflicts with religious law
right to exercise one's religious beliefs is often denied (illegal drugs - peyote, snake handling, polygamy)
Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)
Congress' attempt to prevent the government from making decisions that would limit an individuals free exercise
during times of war
Court gives the other branches more leeway on the First Amendment freedoms (speech and press clause does not disallow government regulation)
prior restraint
constitutional doctrine that prevents government from prohibiting speech or publications before the fact; generally held to be in violation of the 1st Amendment
Alien and Sedition Acts
banned criticism of the Federalist government by Democratic-Republicans, making the publication of "false, scandalous writing against the government of the United States" criminal
states prosecuted those who published articles critical of governmental policies with slavery
positive information about slavery in the North was an offense, while abolitionist papers were censored in the South
Lincoln and free speech
made it unlawful to criticize the government or Civil War on print and arrested newspaper editors, ignoring the Court
Schenck v. US (1919)
Supreme Court upheld the Espionage Act, ruling that Congress could restrict speech that clearly presents danger that would bring about evils they should be able to prevent (anti-war leaflets were not allowed during wartime)
clear and present danger test
test by Court to draw the line between protected and unprotected speech
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
Court created a new test for regulating speech, protecting hate speech as long as it does not incite violence
New York Times Co. v. US (1971)
Pentagon papers case, Court ruled the government could not block publication of secret Department of Defense documents illegally furnishd to the Times by anti-war activists
symbolic speech
symbols, signs and other methods of expression protected by the 1st Amendment
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)
Court held high school students' rights to war black armbands to protest the Vietnam War
hate speech
any communication that belittles a person or group on the basis of characteristics
libel
false written statement that defames a person's character
slander
untrue spoken statements that defame the character of a person
New York Times Co v. Sullivan (1964)
Court overturned the conviction for them printing a full page advertisement accusing Alabama officials of physically abusing African Americans during civil rights protests, holding that actual malice must be there.
fighting words
words that inflict injury to incite immediate breach of peace that are not subject to 1st Amendment restrictions
Miller v. California
Court set out a test redefining obscenity, concluding that lower courts must ask whether the work shows sexual conduct in an offensive way as defined by state law
freedom of assembly and petition
relate to speech and press because the freedom hinges on peaceful conduct
DC v. Heller (2008)
Court offered clarification, holding the 2nd Amendment protected an individual's right to own a firearm for personal use in DC, and later broadening ownership rights to citizens of other states
writs of habeas corpus
petition requesting a judge order authorities to prove a prisoner is being held lawfully and that allows the prisoner to be freed if the government's case does not persuade the judge, implying they have the right to know what charges are being made against them (Article I)
ex post facto laws
laws that make an act punishable as a crime even if the action was legal at the time it was committed (prohibited in Article I)
bills of attainder
laws declaring an act illegal without a judicial trial (prohibited in Article I)
4th Amendment
protects people from unreasonable searches
searches allowed without a warrant
the person arrested, things in plain view, places or things that the arrested person could touch or reach otherwise in the arrestee's immediate control; police must let citizens access vehicles during a search and GPS devices cannot be placed on criminal vehicles; reasonable suspicion if a someone is committing or about to commit a crime for "stock and frisk" searches; consent from occupants present
searches allowed with a warrant
houses and offices
5th Amendment
imposes restrictions on federal government for rights of persons suspected of commiting crimes (present cases before a grand jury, right not to self-incriminate)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Court ruled the 5th Amendment requires individuals arrested for a crime to be advised of their right to remain silent and to have counsel present
Miranda rights
statements required of polices that inform a suspect of his or her constitutional rights from the 5th Amendment
double jeopardy clause
protects individuals from being tried twice for the same offense in the same jurisdiction (5th Amendment)
Mapp v. Ohio
Court ruled all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution cannot be used in a state court
6th Amendment
sets out requirements of due process for federal courts to follow in criminal trials
Gideon v. Wainwright
Court concluded states must provide an attorney to indigent cases
right to privacy
right to be left alone (private personal religious beliefs, guarantee against unreasonable searches)
Griswold v. Connecticut
other amendments cast penumbras, unstated liberties on the fringes or in the shadow of more explicitly stated rights, creating zones of privacy
Roe v. Wade
Court found woman's right to abortion was protected by right to privacy that could be implied from guarantees in the Bill of Rights applied to states through the Fourteenth Amendment
civil rights
government-protected rights of individuals against arbitrary or discriminatory treatment by governments or individuals based on race, sex, national origin, sage, religion or sexual orientation
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Court ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and added slaves could not bring suits in federal courts since they were not citizens
13th Amendment
bans slavery in the US
Black Codes
laws denying most legal rights to newly freed slaves in southern states, laying groundwork for Jim Crow laws
14th Amendment
guarantees equal protection and due process of the law to citizens
15th Amendment
enfranchised newly freed male slaves
Jim Crow laws
laws by southern states that required segregation in public venues and schools
poll taxes
tax levied in southern states and localities that had to be paid before an eligible voter could cast a ballot
literacy tests
let local voter registration officials administer difficult reading comprehension tests to potential voters they did not know
grandfather clause
voter qualification provision in southern states that allowed citizens whose grandfathers had voted before Reconstruction to vote unless they passed a wealth/literacy test
Plessy v. Ferguson
Court ruled separate-but-equal accomodations did not violate equal protection in the 14th Amendment
suffrage movement
drive for voting rights for women
19th Amendment
guaranteed the right to vote for women
Brown v. Board of Education
Court held school segregation was unconstitutional because it violated the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal protection, overturning Plessy v. Ferguson