1/20
screaming into the void Monster energy please save me
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Argument
A group of statements of which one (the conclusion) is claimed to follow from the others (the premises). An argument contains a minimum of 1 premise and 1 conclusion.
Statement
A sentence that is either true or false
Prmises
The information intended to provide support for a conclusion.
Truth value
the truth or falsity of a statement
Proposition
The information content imparted by a statement, or, simply put, its meaning.
Inference
The term used by logicians to refer to the reasoning process that is expressed by an argument.
Inferential claim
If a passage expresses a reasoning process—that the conclusion follows from the premises—then we say that it makes an inferential claim.
Explanation
Provides reasons for why or how an event occurred. By themselves, explanations are not arguments; however, they can form part of an argument.
Truth value analysis
determines if the information in the premises is accurate, correct, or true
Logical analysis
determines the strength with which the premises support the conclusion
Deductive argument
An argument in which it is claimed that the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. In other words, it is claimed that under the assumption that the premises are true it is impossible for the conclusion to be false.
3 Characteristics of a deductive argument
1. The argument begins with a generalization, and concludes with a specific claim.
2. The conclusion is contained within the meaning of the premises.
3. IF the premises are true, the conclusion is necessarily true.
Inductive argument
an argument that is supposed to offer probable support to its conclusion. In other words, it is claimed that under the assumption that the premises are true it is improbable for the conclusion to be false.
Valid deductive argument
An argument in which, assuming the premises are true, it is impossible for the conclusion to be false. In other words, the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises.
Invalid deductive argument
assuming the premises are true, it is possible for the conclusion to be false. In other words, the conclusion does not follow necessarily from the premises.
Sound
When logical analysis shows that a deductive argument is valid, and when truth value analysis of the premises shows that they are all true, then the argument is Sound.
Unsound
If a deductive argument is invalid, or if at least one of the premises is false (truth value analysis), then the argument is unsound.
Strong inductive argument
An argument such that if the premises are assumed to be true, then the conclusion is probably true. In other words, if the premises are assumed to be true, then it is improbable that the conclusion is false.
Weak inductive argument
An argument such that if the premises are assumed to be true, then the conclusion may be false.
Cogent argument
An inductive argument is cogent when the argument is strong and the premises are true.
Uncogent argument
An inductive argument is uncogent if either or both of the following conditions hold: the argument is weak, or the argument has at least one false premise.