AP Government Court Cases

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/14

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

Government-directed prayer in public schools violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, even if the prayer is denominationally neutral and students may remain silent or be excused from the classroom during its recitation.

<p>Government-directed prayer in public schools violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, even if the prayer is denominationally neutral and students may remain silent or be excused from the classroom during its recitation.</p>
2
New cards

NY Times v. US (1971)

The court upheld the First Amendment/Freedom of the Press rights of the New York Times and Washington Post to print the Pentagon Papers, without risk of government censorship or punishment.

<p>The court upheld the First Amendment/Freedom of the Press rights of the New York Times and Washington Post to print the Pentagon Papers, without risk of government censorship or punishment.</p>
3
New cards

Schenck v. US (1919)

The defendant, who handed out circulars against war and urged for peaceful action, such as petitioning and the repeal the Conscription Act, was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act. Authorities argued that he was attempting to cause insubordination in the military and to obstruct recruitment.

During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished because they represent a "clear and present danger" to national security.

<p>The defendant, who handed out circulars against war and urged for peaceful action, such as petitioning and the repeal the Conscription Act, was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act. Authorities argued that he was attempting to cause insubordination in the military and to obstruct recruitment.</p><p>During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished because they represent a "clear and present danger" to national security.</p>
4
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

Students in an Iowa school were suspended for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam war. The Court ruled that this suspension was unconstitutional, and that public school students do not "shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door." Public school students may engage in symbolic speech, as protected by the First Amendment, when such display does not disrupt classes.

<p>Students in an Iowa school were suspended for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam war. The Court ruled that this suspension was unconstitutional, and that public school students do not "shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door." Public school students may engage in symbolic speech, as protected by the First Amendment, when such display does not disrupt classes.</p>
5
New cards

U.S. v. Lopez (1995)

Gun Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress's authority to regulate interstate commerce. The first case to begin reigning in Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause.

<p>Gun Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress's authority to regulate interstate commerce. The first case to begin reigning in Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause.</p>
6
New cards

Roe v. Wade (1973)

Abortion is a private matter between a woman and her doctor. Women are entitled to the right of privacy (9th and 14th Amendments). As such, women cannot be denied the right to have an abortion.

<p>Abortion is a private matter between a woman and her doctor. Women are entitled to the right of privacy (9th and 14th Amendments). As such, women cannot be denied the right to have an abortion.</p>
7
New cards

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

Ruled for integration of public schools because racial segregation violates the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection clause.

<p>Ruled for integration of public schools because racial segregation violates the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection clause.</p>
8
New cards

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Established the Supreme Court as having the power of Judicial Review/Interpret the Constitution.

<p>Established the Supreme Court as having the power of Judicial Review/Interpret the Constitution.</p>
9
New cards

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause: Creation of the national bank was implied based upon the enumerated power of Congress to tax and spend. State of Maryland could not tax federal bank due to Supremacy Clause, because the power to tax is the power to destroy.

<p>Implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause: Creation of the national bank was implied based upon the enumerated power of Congress to tax and spend. State of Maryland could not tax federal bank due to Supremacy Clause, because the power to tax is the power to destroy.</p>
10
New cards

Shaw v. Reno (1993)

NO racial gerrymandering; race cannot be the sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative boundaries; majority-minority districts.

<p>NO racial gerrymandering; race cannot be the sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative boundaries; majority-minority districts.</p>
11
New cards

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

State courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to afford their own attorneys.

<p>State courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to afford their own attorneys.</p>
12
New cards

Baker v. Carr (1962)

Established the principle of "one person, one vote". The Court asserted that the federal courts had the right to tell states to reapportion their districts for more equal representation. Ultimately, the Court ordered that state legislative districts to be as near equal as possible in population.

<p>Established the principle of "one person, one vote". The Court asserted that the federal courts had the right to tell states to reapportion their districts for more equal representation. Ultimately, the Court ordered that state legislative districts to be as near equal as possible in population.</p>
13
New cards

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

Dealt with the Amish community's desire to pull their children from public school before the age of 16 so that they could help with farm and domestic work. The Court sided with the Amish and held that parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons.

<p>Dealt with the Amish community's desire to pull their children from public school before the age of 16 so that they could help with farm and domestic work. The Court sided with the Amish and held that parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons.</p>
14
New cards

McDonald v. Chicago (2010)

The Second Amendment that allows the people to keep and bear arms applies to state governments as well as the federal government.

<p>The Second Amendment that allows the people to keep and bear arms applies to state governments as well as the federal government.</p>
15
New cards

Citizens United v. FEC (2010)

Corporations have the same 1st Amendment right as individuals to expressly support political candidates for Congress and the White House through campaign contributions.

<p>Corporations have the same 1st Amendment right as individuals to expressly support political candidates for Congress and the White House through campaign contributions.</p>