Chapters 1-4
why should research methods be taken at the undergraduate level
provides a foundation for understanding information presented in other classes
familiarize students with particular language used to describe research
makes you a more informed and critical thinker
nonscientific ways of knowing
authority
reason
empiricism
authority
unscientific way of knowing where we accept the validity of information from a source that we judge to be an expert
e.g. children believing their parents
reason
unscientific way of knowing where we arrive at a conclusion by using logical and sensible thinking
reasoning on false premises can lead to…
false conclusions
a priori method
a way of knowing in which a person develops a belief by reasoning and reaching an agreement with others who are convinced of the merits of. the reasoned arguement
empiricism
an unscientific way of knowing where the process of learning things through direct observation or experience
empiricism can be influenced by
bias
belief perseverance
the tendency to hold onto ones beliefs even in the fact of contradictory information
confirmation bias
tendency to seek out and pay special attention to information that supports one's beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts a belief
availability heuristic
experiencing unusual or memorable events which causes us to overestimate how often these events occur
attributes of science as a way of knowing
assumes determinism
assumes discoverability
makes systematic observations
produces public knowledge
produces data-based conclusions
produces tentative conclusions
asks answerable questions
develops theories that can be falsified
determinism
all events have causes
statistical determinism
states that events can be predicted, but with only a probability greater than chance
discoverability
all causes and other phenomenon's can be discovered through scientific means
systematic observations
observations less affected by bias than everyday thinking
made by using (a) precise definitions of the phenomena being measured (b) reliable and valid measuring tools (c) accepted research methods and (d) a system of logic for drawing conclusions and fitting those conclusions into general theories
production of public knowledge
replication of objective results increases public confidence that a psychological phenomenon is true
objectivity
eliminating human factors in research such as expectation and bias
data-based conclusions
conclusions about behavior must supported by evidence gathered through some scientific procedure
tentative nature of scientific conclusions
conclusions from data-driven research are always tentative, subject to revision based on future research
empirical questions
questions answerable with data through systematic observations and techniques to characterize specific methodology
falsification principle
for a theory to be considered scientific, it must be able to be tested and conceivably proven false
pseudoscience
refers to any field of inquiry that appears to use scientific methods and tries hard to give that impression, but is actually based on inadequate, unscientific methods and makes claims that are false or overly simplistic
pseudoscience is characterized by…
a deliberate attempt to associate itself with true science
reliance on anecdotal and testimonial evidence
developing theories that are too vague to be adequately tested with scientific methods
fail the test of falsification
tend to explain complicated phenomena in overly simplistic concepts
large popular appeal
goals of research in psychology
aims to provide clear and detailed descriptions of behavioral phenomena
aims to develop laws that enable scientists to predict behavior with probability greater than chance
aims to provide adequate explanations of the causes of behavior
aims to apply principles of behavior learned through research
purpose of ethics systems
set of "standards of governing the conduct of a person or the members of a profession"
principles of the Belmont report (first code of ethics)
respect for persons
beneficence
justice
5 principles of the APA ethics code
beneficence and nonmaleficence
fidelity and responsibility
integrity
justice
respect for people's rights and dignity
beneficence and nonmaleficence (APA)
researchers must constantly weigh the benefits and costs of the research they conduct and seek to achieve the greatest good in their research with little harm done to others
fidelity and responsibility (APA)
researchers must be aware of their responsibility to society and reminds them to maintain the highest level of professionality
integrity (APA)
researchers must be scrupulously honest
justice (APA)
researchers must treat everyone in the research enterprise with fairness and maintain a level of expertise the chances of bias in their work
respect for people's rights and dignity (APA)
researchers must be vigorous in their efforts to safeguard confidentiality and protect the rights of research volunteers
IRB (institutional research board)
formal process that attempts to judge the costs (intrusion on those contributing data to the study) and benefits of research experiments (scientific value)
the role of the IRB is to determine the..
risk encountered by paricipants
no risk (IRB)
observation/no interference
minimal risk (IRB)
as in everyday risk
at risk (IRB)
greater risk than everyday life
why are IRB’s controversial
extent to which IRB's should be judging the details of research procedures and designs
researchers complain that IRB's are overzealous in their concerns about risk
sometimes overemphasize a biomedical research model to evaluate proposals
lack of consistency
informed consent
refers to the idea that human participants should be given enough information about the study's purpose and procedures to decide if they wish to volunteer
deception
the intentional misleading of subjects or the withholding of full information about the nature of the experiment
use of deception is only granted if…
the study cannot be achieved otherwise
debriefing
occurs when the researcher answers any questions the participants may have in regards to the study
2 purposes of debriefing
dehoaxing
desensitizing
dehoaxing
revealing to participants the true purpose of the study and the hypothesis being tested
desensitizing
reducing stress or other negative feelings that might have been due to participation in the study
ethical obligations for research with humans
develop a study in which the benefits outweigh the costs
avoiding doing anything that would harm participants
gain informed consent
assure volunteers they can quit the study at any time, without penalty
provide some form of debriefing
assuring participants about confidentiality and their anonymity
problems with research online
issues with consent; cannot tell if people read informed consent form
problems conducting effective debriefing
ethical guidelines for research with animals
justification of the study is required when potential harm to an animal exists (benefits must outweigh costs)
proper acquisition and care of animals, both during and after the study, both during and after the study
use of animals for educational rather than research purposes
plagiarism
presenting work or ideas from another source as your own, with or without consent of the original author, by incorporating it into your work without full acknowledgement
data falsification
manipulating research data with the intention of giving a false impression
implications of scientific fraud
patients may pay the risk
increased cost risks
decreased/no benefit
if data is false, conclusions and theories will be false
types of scientific fraud
data falsification
plagiarism
3 ways to classify the varieties of psychology
the goals
the setting
the data
varieties of goals of psychology
basic research
applied research
basic research
emphasizes describing, predicting, and explaining the fundamental principles of behavior and mental processes
applied research
research aimed at the direct and immediate relevance to the solution of real-world problems
varieties of settings of psychology
lab
field
lab research
occurs inside a controlled environment which allows for better control with conditions being specified more clearly
field research
occurs in a natural, less controlled environment (usually associated with applied) where the environment more closely matches situations we encounter in daily living
mundane realism
how closely a study mirrors real-life experiences
experimental realism
the extent to which a research study has an impact on the subjects, forces them to take the matter seriously, and involves them in the procedures
varieties of data type of psychology
quantitative
qualitative
quantitative data
data is collected and presented in the form of numbers (averages, percentages, graphs, etc..)
qualitative data
results are presented as analytical narratives which that summarize the project's main outcomes (e.g. case studies, interviews, etc...)
features of empirical questions
must be answerable with data
terms must be precisely defined (operational definitions!!)
operational definitions
precise and objective terms which are defined in terms of a set of procedures to be performed
researcher defines how the concepts to be studied "operate" in an experiment
benefits of operational defintions
forces researchers to clearly define the terms of their studies
allows studies to be repeated (replication)
converging operations
our understanding of some behavioral phenomenon's is increased when a series of investigations (all using slightly different procedures and definitions), converge on a common conclusion
serendiptious events
discovering something while looking for something completely different
theory
set of logically consistent statements about some phenomena that…
best summarizes existing empirical knowledge of the phenomenon
organizes knowledge in the form of precise statements and relationships among variables
proposes an explanation for the phenomenon
serves as the basis for making predictions
cognitive dissonance
the state of discomfort as a product when people hold two opposing cognitions (thoughts) at the same time
can occur within theories and between theories
attributes of good theories
productivity
falsification
parsimony
productive theory
good theories advance knowledge by generating a great deal of research
falsification
the capacity for some proposition, statement, theory or hypothesis to be proven wrong
parsimony
theories include the minimum number of constructs and assumptions needed to explain the phenomenon adequately and predict future outcomes
replication
refers to a study that duplicates some or all of the procedures of a prior study
types of replication
direct - attempted replication of a study's results testing the same type of sample and using the exact procedures and statistical analyses as the original study
conceptual - parts of the procedures of a prior study are purposely changed in order to test predictions similar to those in the original study
sample
the participants of a study
population
general group that we want to make a conclusion about
probability sampling
occurs when every member of a population has an definable chance of being selected for the sample
sampling method that involves randomly selecting a sample, or a part of the population that you want to research
probability sampling procedures
simple random sampling
stratified sampling
cluster sampling
simple random sampling
type of probability sampling where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected as a member of the sample (more sophisticated way of picking names out of a hat)
advantages of simple random sampling
effective
fair
practical
disadvantages of simple random sampling
may not be useful when you want to measure specific features of the population represented in your sample (stratified sampling solves this!)
not practical if the sample is extremely large (cluster sampling solves this!)
stratified sampling
type of probability sampling where proportions of important subgroups are represented precisely by dividing people into re-determined groups called layers or strata
best uses of stratified sampling
when one group may be over-represented in the sample. aims to represent subgroups proportionally
useful for targeting certain groups of individuals when we are trying to examine something specific
cluster sampling
type of probability sampling where you divide a population into clusters, such as districts or schools, and then randomly select some of these clusters as your sample
nonprobability sampling
method of selecting units from a population using a subjective (i.e. non-random) method
types of nonprobability sampling methods
convienence sampling (includes purposive sampling, quota sampling, snowball sampling)
convience sample
nonprobability sampling method where a group of individuals who meet the general requirements of a study and are recruited in a variety of non-random way
purposive sampling
type of convenience sampling method where a researcher seeks out a particular group of individuals
quota sampling
type of convenience sampling method which aims to represent subgroups proportionally but in a non-random way
snowball sampling
type of convenience sampling method where recruiting members of a group based on asking participants to help them recruit more participants through a network of friends
ways to evaluate measures
reliability
validity
validity
when something measures what it intends to measure
reliability
something is reliable if its results are repeatable when the behaviors are remeasured
content validity
refers to whether or not the actual content of the items on the test make sense in terms of the construct being measured
face validity
concerns whether the measure seems valid to those who are taking it
criterion validity
whether the measure is related to some behavioral outcome or criterion that has been established by prior research
further divided into predicitve validity and concurrent validity