Criminology Chp 1

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/91

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

92 Terms

1
New cards

Criminology

The scientific study of why people commit crime and why some places have more crime than others

2
New cards

Scientific method in criminology

Use of hypotheses, systematic observation, theory testing, and empirical evidence

3
New cards

Hypothesis

A specific, testable prediction based on prior knowledge or theory

4
New cards

Empirical research

Research based on observable and measurable evidence rather than authority or opinion

5
New cards

Why criminology is scientific

It develops hypotheses, tests them systematically, and applies findings to theory

6
New cards

Philosophical or legal approach to crime

Uses logic and deductive reasoning without hypothesis testing

7
New cards

Journalistic approach to crime

Relies on anecdotal evidence and case-by-case analysis

8
New cards

Religious approach to crime

Authority-based and guided by dogmatic principles

9
New cards

Theory

A set of concepts linked by statements to explain phenomena

10
New cards

Purpose of theory in criminology

To provide testable explanations for criminal behavior

11
New cards

Can theories be wrong but useful?

Yes, theories can make accurate predictions even if incorrect

12
New cards

Burke and Hare case example

Shows consistent criminal motives across time periods

13
New cards

Theoretical paradigm

A broad framework guiding assumptions about crime and behavior

14
New cards

Four major criminological paradigms

Classical, Positivist, Conflict/Critical, Integrated

15
New cards

Classical School assumption

Humans have free will

16
New cards

Classical School view of behavior

Rational and hedonistic

17
New cards

Classical School explanation of crime

Individuals weigh costs and benefits before offending

18
New cards

Classical School focus

Deterrence and individual choice

19
New cards

Positivist assumption

Humans lack free will or full rationality

20
New cards

Positivist view of crime

Behavior is determined by forces beyond individual control

21
New cards

Factors emphasized by Positivism

Genetics, IQ, education, peers, parenting, employment, economics

22
New cards

Goal of Positivist criminology

Scientific identification of causal factors

23
New cards

Conflict theory assumption

Laws serve those in power

24
New cards

Conflict theory level of analysis

Group-level

25
New cards

Conflict theory view of law

Used by powerful groups to control less powerful groups

26
New cards

Focus of Conflict theory

Differential application of the justice system

27
New cards

Integrated theory assumption

Multiple factors work together to explain crime

28
New cards

Strength of integrated theories

Broad explanations of crime

29
New cards

Weakness of integrated theories

Potential logical inconsistencies

30
New cards

Micro-level analysis

Focus on individuals

31
New cards

Macro-level analysis

Focus on groups or societies

32
New cards

Consensus model of law

Laws reflect shared values of society

33
New cards

Conflict model of law

Laws reflect interests of powerful groups

34
New cards

Strain theory assumption of human nature

People are born good but corrupted by society

35
New cards

Control theory assumption of human nature

People are born bad and need control

36
New cards

Differential association assumption of human nature

People are blank slates shaped by environment

37
New cards

Parsimony

The simplest explanation is preferred

38
New cards

Example of parsimony

Low self-control theory

39
New cards

Scope

The range of phenomena a theory explains

40
New cards

Logical consistency

Theory concepts make sense together

41
New cards

Example of poor logical consistency

Lombroso’s tattoo theory

42
New cards

Testability

Theory can be empirically tested

43
New cards

Empirical validity

Theory is supported by research evidence

44
New cards

Example of empirical validity

Differential reinforcement theory

45
New cards

Policy implications

Theory provides practical solutions

46
New cards

Example of policy implications

Broken windows theory

47
New cards

Temporal ordering

X must occur before Y

48
New cards

Correlation or covariation

Changes in X are associated with changes in Y

49
New cards

Spuriousness

Relationship explained by a third variable

50
New cards

Z variable

An alternative explanation for a correlation

51
New cards

Ice cream and crime example

Temperature explains the relationship

52
New cards

Challenge in criminology research

Cannot randomly assign criminogenic conditions

53
New cards

Ethical constraint in criminology

Experiments cannot manipulate harmful conditions

54
New cards

Uniform Crime Report (UCR)

A national measure of crime based on police reports

55
New cards

UCR advantage

Longest historical crime data

56
New cards

UCR reliability

Reliable for murder and motor vehicle theft

57
New cards

UCR limitation

Dark figure of crime

58
New cards

Dark figure of crime

Crime that goes unreported

59
New cards

UCR best used for

Historical trends and homicide research

60
New cards

National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)

A survey measuring victimization experiences

61
New cards

NCVS advantage

Captures unreported crime

62
New cards

NCVS limitation

Excludes homeless, children, and businesses

63
New cards

NCVS does not measure

Homicide

64
New cards

Telescoping effect

Respondents misreport timing of events

65
New cards

NCVS best used for

Victimization patterns and unreported crime

66
New cards

Self-Report Data (SRD)

Surveys where individuals report their own offending

67
New cards

SRD advantage

Captures psychological and social factors

68
New cards

SRD limitation

Potential dishonesty and lack of national estimates

69
New cards

SRD best used for

Theory testing and individual-level factors

70
New cards

Crime peak of 1920s–1930s

Prohibition and Great Depression

71
New cards

Crime decline of 1940s

World War II demographic changes

72
New cards

Crime increase of 1960s–1980s

Baby Boom and age-crime relationship

73
New cards

Crime decline since 1990s

Multiple contributing factors

74
New cards

Regions with highest crime rates

South and West

75
New cards

Urban-rural crime pattern

Urban higher than suburban, suburban higher than rural

76
New cards

Hot spots

Crime clusters in specific locations

77
New cards

Theory supported by hot spots

Opportunity theory

78
New cards

Juvenile crime peak time

Around 3 PM

79
New cards

Theory explaining juvenile crime timing

Supervision theory

80
New cards

Adult crime peak time

Around 11 PM

81
New cards

Seasonal crime pattern

Higher in summer

82
New cards

Theory explaining seasonal crime

Routine activities theory

83
New cards

Age-crime curve

Crime peaks in adolescence and declines after

84
New cards

Peak age of offending

Around age 17

85
New cards

Gender pattern in violent crime

Males commit 80–98 percent

86
New cards

Theory tested by gender patterns

Biosocial and social learning theories

87
New cards

Equivalency hypothesis

Lower class has higher violent offending and victimization

88
New cards

Property crime class pattern

Lower class offenders, middle and upper class victims

89
New cards

Race and crime pattern

Crime is largely intraracial

90
New cards

Native American victimization

Highest victimization rates

91
New cards

Effect of controlling for poverty

Racial differences diminish

92
New cards

Purpose of crime patterns in theory testing

To evaluate how well theories explain real-world crime