1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
agustine view (strength) before the fall
will is God given and we can choose to do good or evil
will is driven by selfless love
friendship expresses cartias a s amior dei (love of god)
agustines view after the fall (strength)
pride is adams sin
will becomes divided and man is no longer able to control his libido, appetite or desiring aspect of the soul which is dominated by concupience
sin is ontological, so no one is good
grace pelaguis vs augstine
p= humans can live morally pure live after the fall as long as they try hard
a= humans can only be saved through grace not good works
Dawkins evolutionary biology (weakness)
it’s absurd to imagine that the corruption of all of humanity rests on two people if humans emerged from less sophisticated animal forms which lacked consciousness
even if the fall is symbolic it doesn’t rid Christianity of its unhealthy obsession with sin associated with sex
the idea that god saved humanity by killing his only son is sado-masochristic
psychology of sex - freud (weakness)
rejects augstines’s view that original sin is transmitted through sexual intercourse and that pleasure is part of it
sex isn’t just for reproduction but is a natural thing
human disorders are usually environmental
kants the good will (weakness)
augstine = salvatiom through grace but kant says salvation through reason
there are powerful human emotions but no such thing is sin just a lack of reason
moral life seeks to rise above animal instinics and rests on the good will and obdeince to reason
satre bad faith (weakness)
rejection of human nature as it means that we can never truly be free and develop our own personalities
man is condemned to be free and can make his own choices
to deny our freedom and choose how we act is bad faith
repsonse to dawkins - barbour
agrees that evolutionary biology means that orginal sin makes no sense
but suggests that suffering, conflict and death all long proceed humanity
gensis 3 is an imagtive story about how humans use their potential and relationship within the world
creation fall and redepmtion arent single events but contuinous processes in each persons life
response to freud
Agustine accepts human emotions and tires to take them into account
response to kant, reinhold niebuhr
immoral society niebuhr though post-enlightenment thinkers have made it unfashionable to talk about sin
isnt wrong to think that reason alone can bring about just and fair socieites
colin gunton (strength)
modern debates fail to recognise Augustines important insight that science and philosophy do not consider the religious dimension of being a human