2. schaffer's stages of attachment

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/12

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

13 Terms

1
New cards

who investigated stages of attachment

schaffer & emerson 1964

2
New cards

stages of attachment

  1. asocial stage

  2. indiscriminate attachment

  3. specific/discriminate attachment

  4. multiple attachments

3
New cards

asocial stage

  • in the first few weeks

  • behaviour towards humans and inanimate objects is fairly similar

  • did not believe it is entirely asocial as babies still show signs that they prefer to be with people

4
New cards

indiscriminate attachment

  • from 2 to 7 months

  • display more obvious and observable behaviours

  • show clear preference for being with humans rather than inanimate objects

  • recognise and prefer company of familiar people but usually accept comfort from anyone

5
New cards

specific/discriminate attachment

  • from around 7 months

  • display classic signs of attachment towards one particular person - separation anxiety and stranger anxiety

  • baby has formed a specific attachment to the primary attachment figure - not necessarily who they spend the most time with, but the one who offers the most interactions (mother 65%)

6
New cards

separation anxiety and stranger anxiety definitions

separation anxiety = anxiety when separated from their attachment figure

stranger anxiety = anxiety directed towards strangers

7
New cards

multiple attachments

  • extend to multiple attachments with others they regularly spend time with - secondary attachments

  • schaffer & emerson observed that 29% of the children formed secondary attachments within a month of forming primary ones

8
New cards

evaluation

  1. good external validity (& counterpoint)

  2. real world application

  3. generalisability (& counterpoint)

  4. poor evidence for asocial stage

9
New cards

good external validity

  • study has high external validity

  • observations took place in babies’ own homes (natural environment so avoids artificial behaviour) with most data reported by parents rather than researchers

  • means findings can be generalised to real life caregiver-infant interactions

10
New cards

counterpoint

  • parental observations may lack objectivity

  • they might have been biased or innacurate in reporting behaviours, meaning social desirability bias or memory errors could have influenced results

  • reduces reliability as reported behaviours may not fully reflect reality

11
New cards

real world application

  • research has practical benefits for childcare

  • findings help in planning day care around attachment stages as babies at different stages respond differently to being separated from caregivers

  • supports informed childcare decisions, improving child well-being in day care settings

12
New cards

generalisability & counterpoint

  • large-scale study with 60 babies (31 male and 29 female)

  • but findings may not generalise across cultures as the study was conducted in 1960s working class glasgow - a specific cultural and historical context (low temporal validity)

  • attachment patterns may differ in collectivist cultures where multiple caregivers are common limiting universality

13
New cards

poor evidence for asocial stage

  • asocial stage is difficult to assess

  • babies in this stage are immobile and display few observable behaviours as they have poor coordination and are fairly immobile

  • means the classification of this stage may be innaccurate or misleading