Studied by 1 person

0.0(0)

get a hint

hint

1

What are the 5 ethical guidelines?

Debrief

Informed consent

Right to withdraw

Competent researcher

Deception

New cards

2

What are the 4 ethical principles?

Respect

Competence

Responsibility

Integrity

New cards

3

What is an alternate hypothesis?

A specific testable prediction containing variables, and will state either a difference or relationship.

New cards

4

Directional hypothesis

States the direction the results will go in (more, less, positive, fewer)

New cards

5

Non-directional hypothesis

Does not state the direction of the results, leaving it open

New cards

6

What is the aim of sampling methods?

To ensure a representative sample of participants is used, so can be successfully generalised.

New cards

7

Opportunity sampling

Sample of those who are available at the time of the study

New cards

8

Random sampling

Every member of the population has an equal chance of being chosen.

New cards

9

Stratified sampling

Involves classifying the population into categories and then choosing a sample which consists of participants from each category in the same proportions as they are in the population.

New cards

10

Volunteer sampling

Volunteering when asked or in a response to an advert.

New cards

11

Advantages of random sampling

No bias

Clear how the sample is chosen, process can be explained

New cards

12

Disadvantages of random sampling

Difficult to ensure everyone is available

Some people might not want to take part in the study

There can be bias in that there may be more of one group than the other, such as more male soldiers than female

New cards

13

Advantages of stratified sampling

Each group is represented, so conclusions can be drawn

Efficient to ensure representation from each group

New cards

14

Disadvantages of stratified sampling

Difficult to know how many of each group to choose

Some groups may not be important fro the study

New cards

15

Advantages of volunteer sampling

More ethical as they chose to take part

Volunteers are likely to be interested so less likely to give biased information, less likely to have social desirability or demand characteristic.

New cards

16

Disadvantages of volunteer sampling

Takes long time to get sufficient numbers

Participants may be similar, so there may not be representation

New cards

17

Advantages of opportunity sampling

-More ethical because the researcher can judge if the participant is likely to be upset by the study

Researcher has more control over choosing, more quick and efficient

New cards

18

Disadvantages of opportunity sampling

More chance of bias - choosing people you know, people of own age, friendly looking people etc.

Self selected, so would rule out anyone not available or not willing

New cards

19

2 types of questions in questionnaires

Closed ended or open ended

New cards

20

Types of closed ended questions

Fixed choice questions, with yes/no response

Likert scale questions, selecting from a fixed set of choices to rate agreement to statements

Ranked scale question, ranking choice relative to other options

New cards

21

Strengths of closed ended questions

Quick and easy to answer

Researchers can easily analyse data, percentages and averages can be worked out

Questions are all the same so is more reliable

New cards

22

Weaknesses of closed ended questions

Limited amount of information

Answers may not match what the participants would like express

Choice answers could mean different things to different respondents, such as 'unsure' could mean 'don't know', so lacks validity

New cards

23

Strengths of open ended questions

Respondents can answer freely

Allows them to elaborate on their answers and justify opinions -More detailed and valid, true to real life

New cards

24

Weaknesses of open ended questions

More time and effort for respondents

Qualitative analysis which can lead to subjective interpretation that is difficult to analyse

Respondents often fail to complete their answers

New cards

25

Social desirability

When a respondent gives an answer that puts them in a more favourable light, desirable to social norms.

New cards

26

3 types of interviews

Structured

Semi-structured

Unstructured

New cards

27

Structured interviews

Standardised so all respondents are asked same questions

New cards

28

Strengths of structured interviews

Easy to administer

Do not need to establish a rapport between researcher and respondent

New cards

29

Weaknesses of structured interviews

Data can be superficial and lack depth

Respondent may not be able to express opinions fully

New cards

30

Semi- structured interviews

More conversational and dynamic. Researcher has a set of questions they want to be answered but do not have a standardised format to follow.

New cards

31

Strengths of semi- structured interviews

Conversation can flow better

More comfortable having a relaxed atmosphere

New cards

32

Weaknesses of semi- structured interviews

Flexibility of interviews may lessen reliability

New cards

33

Unstructured interviews

The interviewer needs to be analytical. No set of questions or format, just asking questions and making direct reference to quotes from respondents.

New cards

34

Strengths of unstructured interviews

More flexible as questions can be changed

Increased validity

Usually in depth and detailed answers

New cards

35

Weaknesses of unstructured interviews

Time consuming

Employing and training interviewers is expensive

New cards

36

Response bias

If the respondents answer a certain way for a list of questions, they may continue to answer in that way out of habit.

New cards

37

Thematic analysis

Qualitative data is made numerical by counting the instances certain themes and categories appear in the data

New cards

38

Aim of thematic analysis

To analyse data without losing its meaningfulness, but making it more manageable by reducing it into patterns, trends and themes.

New cards

39

2 approaches in thematic analysis

INDUCTIVE- Researcher would read and re read data and themes would emerge without imposing ideas or expectations.

DEDUCTIVE- Specify themes that they will look for before analysis of data.

New cards

40

10 steps of thematic analysis

Gather

Journal

Prepare data

Appoint coders

Familiarise

Ideas

Identifying themes

Naming themes

Reliability/ validity check

Report of the results

New cards

41

Strengths of thematic analysis

Encourages researcher to derive themes, so achieves better validity

Large data sets, many researchers can apply their interpretation to the data

New cards

42

Weaknesses of thematic analysis

Highly subjective data as it requires interpretation, so unscientific

Open to researcher bias, not very reliable

New cards

43

Measures of central tendency

Mean, median and mode

New cards

44

The mean

Adding up all values and dividing them by number of scores. Interval/ ratio level data is obtained. Most sensitive and can be affected by extreme values or when there is skewed distribution.

New cards

45

The mode

Most frequent score. Nominal data is obtained. Easy to calculate, not affected by extreme scores, but is not a useful measure on small datasets with frequently occurring same values.

New cards

46

The median

Placed in rank order and is the middle score. Ordinal level data is obtained. Simple calculation and not affected by skewed distribution, but is less sensitive than the mean and not useful on small datasets.

New cards

47

Measures of dispersion

The range and standard deviation

New cards

48

The range

Difference between highest and lowest value. Affected by extreme scores and may not be useful if there are outliers. Does not indicate the distribution around the mean. If there are extreme scores, interquartile range can be used.

New cards

49

Standard deviation

Useful for investigating spread of scores. Shows distance of each value from the mean. Standard deviation represents how the scores are spread around the mean, the higher the value, the greater the spread of scores around the mean value.

New cards

50

Which graphs can be used to illustrate summary data or data frequencies?

Bar charts and histograms

New cards

51

Bar charts

Present data from a categorical variable, such as mean, mode and median. Categorical variable on x-axis and height represents value.

New cards

52

Histograms

Present distribution of scores by illustrating the frequency. Bars are joined to represent continuous data. Possible values on x-axis and y-axis represents frequency.

New cards

53

Normal distribution

Symmetry around the midpoint. Mean, mode and median aligned around the midpoint.

New cards

54

Skewed distribution

New cards

55

Obedience

Obeying direct orders from someone in authority

New cards

56

Compliance

Going along with what someone says, while not necessarily agreeing with it, often with peers rather than those in authority

New cards

57

Conforming

Doing something against the individual's own inclinations, but not doing with the intention of matching the behaviour of the majority.

New cards

58

Internalising

Obeying an agreement

New cards

59

What was the percentage obedience in self-administered variation?

68.75%

New cards

60

What was the percentage obedience in remote-feedback variation?

65%

New cards

61

What was the percentage obedience in verbal feedback variation?

62.5%

New cards

62

What was the percentage obedience in rundown office block variation?

48%

New cards

63

What was the percentage obedience in proximity variation?

40%

New cards

64

What was the percentage obedience in touch proximity variation?

30%

New cards

65

What was the percentage obedience in telephonic instructions variation?

22.5%

New cards

66

What was the percentage obedience in ordinary man gives orders variation?

20%

New cards

67

Where did Milgram conduct his study?

Yale University

New cards

68

What was the background of Milgram's research?

Focused on conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. Justifications for acts of genocide during WWII.

New cards

69

Milgram's aim

Whether ordinary people will follow orders and give an innocent person an electric shock, and what conditions would increase or decrease the level of obedience.

New cards

70

What sampling method did Milgram use?

Volunteer sampling - advert in a local newspaper

New cards

71

What participants did Milgram ask for?

Male of military occupations

New cards

72

What did Milgram say his study was about?

Memory and learning

New cards

73

How much money were the participants paid?

$4

New cards

74

How many participants were in Milgram's study?

160 - 4 conditions, so 40 participants in each

New cards

75

How many confederates in Milgram's study?

2 - the experimenter and Mr Wallace

New cards

76

What were the roles?

Rigged - participant was always the teacher and Mr Wallace was the learner.

New cards

77

What was the voltage of the sample shock?

45V

New cards

78

How many switches sin the shock generator?

30 switches increasing in 15 volts from 15V to 450V

New cards

79

What did the participant have to do?

Teach the learner a list of word pairs and shocks were administered if an incorrect pair was given.

New cards

80

What were the 4 verbal prods?

Please continue

The experiment requires you to continue

It is absolutely essential that you continue

You have no other choice but to continue, you must go on

New cards

81

How many variations are there in Milgram's study?

18

New cards

82

Remote-feedback condition

Learner banged on wall at 300V and refused to answer after 315V

New cards

83

Verbal feedback condition

At 75V, learner grunts. 120V shouts that it is painful. 135V painful groans. 150V shouts "Experimenter get me out of here". 270V agonising screams. 300V refusal to continue.

New cards

84

Proximity condition

Learner could be seen and heard as the learner and teacher are in the same room

New cards

85

Touch proximity condition

Learner has to place his own hand on the shock plate to receive the shock. At 150V refuses to continue and experimenter orders teacher to force the learner's hand on the shock plate.

New cards

86

What was given to the participants in the end of Milgram's study?

Debrief and a follow-up questionnaire

New cards

87

What did Milgram conclude?

When learner could not be seen or heard, participant was more likely to follow orders. Provides evidence that people will obey orders given to somebody in a role of authority, even to the extent of killing an innocent human being.

New cards

88

Strengths in Milgram's original study

Right to withdraw given

Deception was a necessity because the research was studying obedience, so prevents demand characteristic

Lab experiment - standardised procedure, scripted, quantitative and qualitative data gathered. Good controls, so replicable and reliable

Debriefed

New cards

89

Weaknesses in Milgram's original study

Verbal prods and incentive prevents withdrawal from study

Stress was deliberately caused to the participants

Lacks ecological validity

Androcentric, ethnocentric, sampling method affects generalisability

Deception 4 times - shocks not real, Mr Wallace, not a study on memory and learning, allocation of roles

New cards

90

Telephonic instructions

Initial instructions given face to face, then experimenter would leave the room and continue to give instructions via telephone. Shows presence of authority figure impacts obedience.

New cards

91

Rundown office block

A rundown office building in Bridgeport was used. Shows that location impacts level of obedience.

New cards

92

Ordinary man gives orders

Experimenter was an ordinary man. 1st confederate was the learner, 2nd confederate was the experimenter. Experimenter takes a phone call, and teacher is told to continue. Learner suggests that they should increase the shock level each time he makes a mistake.

New cards

93

Self-administered shocks

Learner has to administer shocks to himself. If participant refuses, the teacher witnesses self-administered shocks.

New cards

94

Sampling method used by Meeus and Raaijmakers

Volunteer sampling- newspaper advert

New cards

95

How many participants in M + R

39 Dutch participants - 24 in experimental condition and 15 in control

New cards

96

What did the participants have to do in M + R?

Make a series of 15 increasingly distressing remarks to the interviewees

New cards

97

What was the experimental and control condition? (M+R)

Experimental - experimenter who gave the orders sat in the interview Control - experimenter was not present

New cards

98

What classed as obedient? (M+R)

The participant who made all the stress remarks was obedient and those who refused was disobedient

New cards

99

What were the results in M+R?

Experimental condition - 92% made all 15 stressful comments Control condition - 0% did

New cards

100

What did M+R conclude?

People in everyday situations like a job interview will generally obey orders to abuse a stranger psychologically.

New cards