1/45
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
disinfection
may not inactivate all viruses or bacterial spores
used when sterilization is not possible to help prevent cross-contamination
reduces the number of viable microorganisms to an acceptable level but doesnt kill all of them
examples of disinfectants
alcohols
iodophors
chlorine dioxide
sodium hypochlorite
quaternary ammonium compounds
3 levels of disinfection
high level
intermediate level
low level
sterilization
destroys all microorganisms including viruses, bacteria, fungi, and spores
common cause of inadequate sterilization
overpacking the sterilizer:
prevents proper steam penetration
heat-sensitive indicators
should not be interpreted as proof of sterility
best used to record that package was autoclaved
special tapes change color at sterilizer temperature
limitations:
show only that temperature was reached
do not confirm sufficient time for proper killing
5 types of sterilization
dry heat
chemiclave
steam autoclave
ethylene oxide glass
immersion in liquid chemical (disinfection/sterilization)
common sterilization methods in dentistry
autoclaving
chemiclave
cold chemicals
dry heat sterilizer
cold chemicals
used only for heat-sensitive instruments
limitations:
time cycle difficult to monitor
not time efficient for dentistry
require extended soak times
recommended only for items that cannot be heat sterilized
safety concerns:
poisonous
harmful to patients even in small amounts
autoclaving
gold standard to sterilize endodontic instruments
uses water heated to produce steam under pressure to sterilize instruments, which is the most common method in healthcare
statim autoclave → uses higher temps for faster cycles
key parameters:
o steam (water), time, pressure, temperature
(if makwaan ug isa, di mugana so dapat naa tanan)
standard cycle of autoclaving
30 mins at 250°F (121°C) and 15 psi (amount of pressure)
flash sterilization of autoclaving
10 mins at 273°F (134°C) and 30 psi (amount of pressure)
advantages of autoclaving
excellent penetration of moist heat
instruments can be wrapped, extending shelf life
safe for most dental tools and cloth material
disadvantages of autoclaving
can dull or corrode sharp tools
requires air drying to prevent rust
not suitable for heat/moisture-sensitive items (like plastic/rubber, ortho mats)
chemiclave
uses a mix of 72% ethanol and 0.23% formaldehyde instead of water
key parameters:
o chemicals, time, pressure, temperature
cycle of chemiclave
270°F (132°C) at 20 psi for 20 minutes (including drying time)
advantages of chemiclave
fast turnaround time
ideal for carbon steel tools
prevents rust and dulling of instruments
disadvantages of chemiclave
requires proper ventilation
instruments may retain smell
releases strong chemical odors (formaldehyde)
not suitable for sterilizing liquids (use steam autoclave instead)
advantages of dry heat sterilizer
using still or forced air
prevent instrument corrosion
require no water or chemicals
disadvantages of dry heat sterilizer
long sterilization time
requires higher temperatures
wrapped items take longer and may need special wraps
cycle of still-air models
sterilize in 1 hour at 375°F (191°C)
forced-air models (like Cox) → do it in 6 minutes
glass bead sterilizer / salt sterilizer
used glass beads to transfer dry heat
uses chair-side sterilization between appointments
not recommended currently bc it is not effective
previously used for sterilizing endodontic instruments during treatment at 450°F (218°C) for a few seconds
—named salt bc it has pebbles of crystals (glass bead) that would heat up and will sterilize the instru
critical items
must be sterilized; single-use items discarded
touch sterile areas or enter the vascular system; penetrate oral mucosa
examples of critical items
files, nerve broaches
most of endo materials since they are introduced in the canals
semi-critical items
touch mucous membranes but do not penetrate tissues
sterilize if possible; otherwise, high-level disinfection
examples of semi-critical items
orthodontic tools
impression trays
nonsurgical burs and stones
examination and operative instruments
saliva ejectors, water syringe tips, lab prostheses
non-critical items
disinfection required
do not contact mucosa
touched by contaminated hands or fluids
examples of non-critical Items
x-ray tube head
instrument tables
dental chair headrest
dental light handles, spittoon
suction and saliva ejector handles
high-level disinfection
destroys all microorganisms except large numbers of bacterial endospores
advantages:
HIV, fungi
some spores
M. tuberculosis
effective against most microbes
disinfectants of high-level
glutaraldehyde
strong peroxides
o-phthaldehyde
intermediate-level disinfection
inactivates M. tuberculosis, most viruses, fungi, and vegetative bacteria (not spores)
advantages:
suitable for surfaces and some medical tools
effective against a wide range of pathogens
disinfectants of intermediate-level
chlorines
phenolics
iodophors
quats with alcohol
low-level disinfection
kills most bacteria
some viruses and fungi
not effective against TB or spores
advantage:
safe for general use on non critical surfaces
disinfectants of low-level
some phenolics
some iodophors
quaternary ammonium
common disinfectants for endo materials (gp, sealers, pp)
alcohol
glutaraldehyde
hydrogen peroxide
chlorhexidine (CHX)
polyvinylpyrrolidone iodine
sodium hypochlorite (NaOCI)
mixture tetracycline citric acid & detergent (MTAD)
chlorine dioxide
for instruments
operatory surface disinfection
advantages of chlorine dioxide
no rinsing, no residue
fast-acting (1-3 mins)
disadvantages of chlorine dioxide
corrosive to oxidized metals
must prepare fresh solution each time
sodium hypochlorite
surface disinfection
not for instruments
best friend!!!
advantages of sodium hypochlorite
effective
relatively quick (3-30 mins depending on debris)
disadvantages of sodium hypochlorite
highly corrosive to metals
iodophors
for HBV, TB, etc
broad-spectrum disinfection
advantages of iodophors
effective against many pathogens
slow iodine release enhances effect
disadvantages of iodophors
slower action (-30mins)
inactivated by hard water
alcohols
not accepted by ADA for surface or instrument disinfection
quaternary ammonium compounds
disapproved by ADA for dental use