1/30
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Linguistics
the study of how language works
how it is used
how it is acquired
how it changes over time
how it is represented in the brain, and so on
concerns the properties of the world’s languages as well as the abilities and adaptations that have made it possible for our species to create and use language in the first place
Speech Organs
lungs
vocal cords
tongue
teeth
lips
nose
Dual Function of Lungs (survival and speech)
Survival Function
to exchange carbon dioxide and oxygen
Speech Function
to supply air for speech
Dual Function of Vocal Cords (survival and speech)
Survival Function
to create a seal over passage to lungs
Speech Function
to produce vibrations for speech sounds
Dual Function of Tongue (survival and speech)
Survival Function
to move food to teeth and back into throat
Speech Function
to articulate vowels and consonants
Dual Function of Teeth (survival and speech)
Survival Function
to break up food
Speech Function
to provide place of articulation for consonants
Dual Function of Lips (survival and speech)
Survival Function
to seal oral cavity
Speech Function
to articulate vowels and consonants
Dual Function of Nose (survival and speech)
Survival Function
to assist in breathing and smelling
Speech Function
to provide nasal resonance during speech
Language Has to be a Creative System
finite system of rules, but there are always:
new things to say
new experiences to report
new challenges to confront
speakers can produce and understand infinitely many new sentences
creativity in language is systematic not random
Other Forms of Creativity in Language
our innovations in language use:
nouns instead of verbs
unacceptable forms
so there are constraints in the forms we create and meaning we can communicate
Innovations in Language Use — Nouns Instead of Verbs
beach the boat
bottle the wine
holiday in Japan
winter in Hawaii
Innovations in Language Use — Unacceptable Forms
Jerome midnighted in the streets
Andrea nooned at the resturant
Philip one o’clocked at the airport
Linguistic Rules Define
which words are possible
which sentences are acceptable
which meanings are allowed
Competence vs. Performance
Chomsky (1965) made a fundamental distinction between:
Competence — the speaker-hearer’s knowledge of the language
Performance — the actual use of language in authentic situations
in an ideal world, performance is a direct reflection of competence
Structural View and Generative Grammar
…by a generative grammar I mean simply a system of rules that in some explicit and well defined way assigns structural descriptions to sentences
Generative Grammar
a grammar of a language purports to be a description of the ideal speaker-hearer’s intrinsic competence
if the grammar is perfectly explicit — in other words, if it does not rely on the intelligence of the underlying reader but rather provides an explicit analysis of his contribution — we may (somewhat redundantly) call it that
Why is Generative Grammar Important
it helps explain language in terms of syntax, semantics and morphology, and it provides a foundation for learning any language
Linguistic Competence
the mental system that allows human beings to form and interpret the sounds, words, and sentences of their language
this system is called grammar/competence and is categorized into:
phonetics
phonology
morphology
syntax
semantics
Phonetics
sounds of language
Phonology
the patterning of speech sounds
Morphology
word formation
Syntax
sentence formation
Semantics
the interpretation of words and sentences
What to Consider When Doing Linguistic Analysis
Generality
Parity
Universality
Mutability
Inaccessibility
Generality
all languages have a grammar
no language is chaotic or structureless
languages may differ greatly from English
difference does not equal lack of grammar
ex; Warlpiri allows flexible word order — grammatical roles are marked morphologically
Parity
all grammars are equal
no language is primitive or inferior
no grammar is “better” or “worse”
all grammars serve their speakers equally well
social judgements do not equal linguistic facts
linguistics is descriptive; it studies how language is actually used
prescriptive rules reflect social values, not grammar
ex; ending sentences with prepositions is grammatical in English
Universality
all grammars are alike in basic ways
all languages share fundamental properties
consonants and vowels
rules for forming sentences
variation exists but is constrained
word order patterns: most languages use SVO, SOV, or VSO
some structures are universally impossible
Mutability
all grammars change over time
language change is constant and inevitable
frequent forms resist change longer
change effects
vocabulary
sounds
grammar
example
English negation evolved from ne…not (e.g., He ne speaketh nawt) to not alone
Inaccessibility
grammatical knowledge is subconscious
most grammatical knowledge is unconscious
speakers know what is right or wrong but not why
Inaccessibility — Examples
past tense -ed
3 pronunciations
hunted
slipped
buzzed
speakers apply the rules automatically
even new verbs follow the pattern
judgements without explanation
speakers can judge correctness
I went to school vs. I went to supermarket
but cannot explain the rule
interpretation depends on grammar, not words alone
affirmative
Mary drank tea or coffee
negative
Mary didn’t drink tea or coffee
More Modern Understanding of Grammar
grammar is not a set of prescriptive rules
it is the mental knowledge speakers have that allows them to:
produce sentences
understand sentences
judge what sounds “possible” or “impossible” in their language
grammar = the intricate network of knowledge that underlies our ability to use language