1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Monopoly
a single seller of a good
no close substitutes
high barriers to entry
is essentially the market
Market Power
the ability to set a price above the marginal cost
a monopolist is a price-maker not a price-taker
MR < P
MR always lies below the demand
selling one more unit cuts prices on all units
Profit-Max Rule
All firms → produce where MR = MC
Monopoly vs. Competition
Monopoly:
higher P
lower Q
dead-weight loss
Perfect Competition:
P = MC
allocatively efficient
Dead-weight loss
the triangle between D and MC → from Qm to Qc
represents mutually beneficial trades that don’t happen under monopoly
No supply curve
a monopolist has no supply curve
Barriers to Entry
patents
licenses
control of resources
economies of scale
network effects
Natural Monopoly
one firm can supply the market at lower ATC than two or more times
economies of scale over the entire range
P = ATC
firm earns zero economic profit
not allocatively efficient
average cost pricing
P = MC Regulation
eliminates dead-weight loss → allocatively efficient
if MC < ATC → loss and requires subsidy
The regulatory dilemma
P = MC is efficient
could cause bankruptcy
P = ATC → doesn’t fully eliminate DWL
Unregulated outcome
standard monopoly
MR = MC
price on D curve
economic profit
lowest output
highest price
largest DWL
Price Discrimination
selling the same good at different prices to different buyers
price differences aren’t justified by costs
Price Discrimination → three conditions
market power
ability to segment customers by willingness to pay
ability to prevent resale
Price Discrimination Purpose
capture consumer surplus
convert to producer surplus (profit)
Perfect Price Discrimination
charge each buyer their willingness to pay
eliminates all DWL and consumer surplus
Price Discrimination Effect on Output
increases output vs single price monopoly
more customers are served at different prices
Price Discrimination Examples
airline tickets
student/senior discounts
coupons
early bird specials
financial aid
software tiers
Oligopoly
a few large firms dominate the market
high barriers to entry
products may be identical or differentiated
Oligopoly Interdependence
each firm must consider how rivals will react to
pricing
output
and advertising decisions
Collusion and Cartels
firms cooperate to act like a monopoly
a cartel is a formal collusion
illegal under Sherman Act
Game Theory
framework for analyzing strategic interaction
each players best move depends on others choices
Payoff Matrix
a table showing profits for each combination of strategies
Dominant Strategy
yields the best playoff regardless of what the other player does
NOT ALL GAMES HAVE ONE
Nash Equilibrium
the outcome where no player can improve by unilaterally changing strategy
Prisoners Dilemma
both have a dominant strategy to defect
explains cartel instability
Monopolistic Competition Definition
many firms
differentiated products
free entry and exit
each firm has a small degree of market power
Monopolistic Competition Product Differentiation
source of market power
each firms demand is slightly downward sloping
Monopolistic Competition Short Run
like a mini monopoly
profit, break even, loss
MR = MC
Monopolistic Competition Long-Run
entry exit drive profit is 0
P = ATC
Monopolistic Competition Excess Capacity
firm can lower costs by producing more
but that wouldn’t maximize profit
P > MC Always
prices exceeds MC
allocative inefficiency is the price of variety
Entry and Exit
Profits → entry → D shifts left → profit
Losses → exit → D shifts right → loss