Comm 101 Midterm 2

5.0(5)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/95

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

96 Terms

1
New cards
Ethos
Character, expertise, experience, etc of the speaker
2
New cards
Logos
Logic, reasoning, and evidence provided to support claims made
3
New cards
Pathos
Emotional reasons or appeals used to involve the audience’s feelings and personal values
4
New cards
Aristotle’s “Modes of Proof”
Ethos, logos, pathos
5
New cards
Fisher’s narrative paradigm
A rhetorical theory that asserts that audiences are not as rational as we have thought of them as being. Logic, rationality, and reasoning are important elements of argumentation. But according to this theory, the most effective arguments include both “reasons for” and “values for” and values are best expressed through narratives
6
New cards
Narratives
True stories that have values embedded within them
7
New cards
The quality of a narrative is determined by
coherence and fidelity
8
New cards
Coherence
Is the story well organized and structured to create a kind of “dramatic arc”?
9
New cards
Fidelity
Does the story “ring true”? Degree of perceived truthfulness and accuracy
10
New cards
Facts
Have been empirically verified, or at least, are able to be empirically verified or disproven
11
New cards
Inferences
assumptions about the unknown, based on the known
12
New cards
Value judgments
One’s opinions about something
13
New cards
Critical thinking
To consciously evaluate other’s messages by evaluating if the speaker is credible, if the speakers message provided sound evidence and reasoning. Essentially, how truthful, accurate, and trustworthy was what the speaker says?
14
New cards
Hitler’s methods of persuading the masses
Arguments must be directed to the least intelligent of the people, avoid “scientific ballast” as much as possible, seek not “the many sidedness of scientific teaching”, never permit the faintest suggestion that there is “right on the other side”, no halfway urgings will do; things are either “positive or negative, love or hate, right or wrong, truth or lie”
15
New cards
General semantics
Sub-field from the fields of Philosophy, semantics, and pragmatics (communication) and can be thought of as a critical theory of language use
16
New cards
Niagara of words
Refers to our continuous and unrelenting exposure to words all day long, every day
17
New cards
Language influences our thinking
Language is a powerful and beneficial tool, but it has pitfalls. The primary one being that language isn’t “real”. Language can distort our perceptions of what is true and what isn’t. We can be lied to and not know it or we can misinterpret messages and make wrong assumptions
18
New cards
Polarized thinking
Another pitfall of language use is that language “encourages” polarized thinking in two ways: use of the word “not” and the results of is inaccurate meanings
19
New cards
Levels of abstraction
Another way the we can think (and thus act) inaccurately, is when the language used is very high on the “abstraction ladder”. All words are “abstract” in that they are not real - words are only symbolic representations of life experience, but they are not “the thing” and therefore, all words are only estimates of “reality”. The more abstract the words used, the more likely that misunderstandings will result.
20
New cards
Prototypical thinking
Thinking of what is most common to one’s culture or social group (dog or a cat)
21
New cards
Idiosyncratic thinking
Thinking of what’s true for the person him/herself. (My type of pet.)
22
New cards
Outlining
Enables us to organize all our ideas in a clear, logical fashion by levels of abstraction by including general concepts all the way to the most concrete examples of the general concepts
23
New cards
Categorizing/classifying
The use of categories is a necessary convenience, but it can lead to faulty thinking. It can lead to stereotyping, which is not an accurate way to think
24
New cards
Stereotyping
Results in “thinking in similarities” when, in reality, everything is profoundly unique. No single thing or person is exactly the same. When we apply categorical thinking to individuals, that is one example of thinking inaccurately
25
New cards
Thinking in differences
When we refer to an object or person in a specific way our minds know that the referent is a single individual
26
New cards
Thinking in similarities
But, as soon as we classify that individual into a group that includes others based on a limited and pre-defined set of commonalities, the individuals entity or object loses its individuality in our minds
27
New cards
Fallacies
“arguments” that speakers make that are not logical or accurate, barriers to rational discussions
28
New cards
Damning the origin
This is rejection of a piece of evidence simply because the source of the evidence (even “bad people” can provide valid evidence on things)
29
New cards
Appeal to tradition
Simply because something has been done a certain way in the past, it does not follow that it is a necessarily desirable way of doing it in the future. Conversely, just because something is new and innovative, doesn’t make it necessarily better than an “older” way
30
New cards
The bandwagon
Simply because a large number of people hold an opinion, it does not follow that the opinion is valid
31
New cards
Hasty generalization
Making a generalization based on too few examples
32
New cards
Faulty causation
Assuming there is a casual relationship between two variables when in fact it could just be a coincidence, or correlation, or some other cause all together
33
New cards
Appeal to authority
Using someone’s opinion as fact. Believing that experts know everything on a subject
34
New cards
Closed role system
One that reduces the number of alternatives for participants. Roles are set and people are viewed in terms of these roles
35
New cards
Open role system
One that expands the number of alternatives for individuals in the group. Roles are fluid. Thus, there is little shared understanding of a person’s identity within an open system, so ECs are required.
36
New cards
Elaborated codes
Used by speakers who value individuality over group identification. The intent of the speaker cannot be inferred from their roles and so they have to be able to express themselves individually in some detail. They mist “elaborate” in order to be understood. Used in groups in which perspectives are not shared
37
New cards
Restricted codes
Appropriate in groups in which there is a strongly shared set of assumptions about rules and values. Oriented toward categories social categories for which everyone has the same meanings.
38
New cards
Relational schemas in the family
Asserts that family communication is not random but is highly patterned based on particular schemas that determine how family members communicate with one another
39
New cards
Conformity orientation
These families do not spend much time talking and tend to go along with family authority figures points of view and rules
40
New cards
Conversation orientation
These families like to talk and accept individuality
41
New cards
Consensual
High in both conversation and conformity. They have a lot of talk but the family authority, usually a parent, makes decision
42
New cards
Pluralistic
High in conversation and low in conformity. Lots of unrestrained conversation, but everyone will decide for themselves what actions to take
43
New cards
Protective
Low in conversation, high in conformity. There is a lot of obedience and very little communication. Parents don’t spend a lot of time talking with the kids or explaining their decisions
44
New cards
Laissez-faire
Low in both conversation and conformity. Involves a hands-off, low involvement approach. “emotionally divorced”. No one really cares too much about one another and especially do not want to talk things through
45
New cards
Speech act theory
Asserts that words are “not nothing”. Verbal utterances are not just “puffs of air” that can be easily ignored or brushed off. This is because senders have intentions when choosing to speak. Utterances (when someone says something) are used to make things happen, Part of accurate interpretation of messages requires paying attention to the intention behind the utterance. Speech act theorists call the sender’s intention the illocutionary force of the message
46
New cards
Illocutionary force
The sender’s intention behind a message
47
New cards
Theory of indirectness
Asserts that utterance can be direct or indirect. When we are indirect in a message, we meaning something without actually saying what is meant. The receiver must infer from the context of the utterance what the speaker actually means.
48
New cards
Direct utterances
When the syntactic form of the utterance aligns with the illocutionary force/the intention behind the utterance. Form = function
49
New cards
Indirect utterances
When the syntactic form of the utterance does not align with the illocutionary force of the utterance. Form does not equal function
50
New cards
Two contradictory and conflicting basic needs
The need for connection and intimacy with others and the need for space and autonomy away from other human beings
51
New cards
Pay offs to indirectness
Establishing a sense of rapport and self or other protection
52
New cards
Establishing a sense of rapport
Responding to indirect messages gives us a sense of connection and intimacy; as though someone knows us so well as to read our minds
53
New cards
Self or other protection
Indirectness can help us to avoid confrontation, vulnerability, embarrassment, putting someone “on the spot”, etc. If we hint at things and are rejected, we can always act as though we meant “something else”
54
New cards
Theory of Guilt
Asserts that all language-using human beings experience guilt and guilt influences our perception of self as well as our communication with others
55
New cards
Guilt
An all purpose word for any feeling of tension within a person, including anxiety, embarrassment, self-hatred/disgust, dissonance, and shame
56
New cards
Principles of guilt
Viewed as the causes of guilt. These are the principle of the negative, of perfection, and of hierarchy
57
New cards
The principle of the negative
Through language people can speculate (think) and speak about options. To follow one choice is to reject another. To be aware of what was not chosen can result in guilt for not choosing it
58
New cards
The principle of perfection
Humans are sensitive to their imperfections. Humans can imagine, through language, a state of perfection. Guilt arises as a result of the cognitive awareness of the discrepancy between the real and the non real, between current reality and our idealistic concepts of reality
59
New cards
The principle of hierarchy
In seeking order, people structure society into social pyramids (the smartest, the richest, the sexiest man alive). Competitions and divisions amongst people create guilt because making value based comparisons inherently puts some people “up” in a hierarchy, and some people “down” in a hierarchy
60
New cards
Socio-cultural theories
Describe how individual and social identities, meanings, and differences are not pre determined by psychological and biological mechanisms but are instead socially constructed through communication
61
New cards
Social approach theory
Analyze human behaviors using a theatrical metaphor, in which the ordinary setting is a stage and people are actors on that stage whose use performances to make an impression on the audience and to have a place within the larger drama. Sees the self as a performed character, not as an organic thing, but as a dramatic effect arising from social convention and from the scene that is presented
62
New cards
Face engagement
When people interact with one another in a focused way. People in this take turns presenting their roles to one another. Each role plays an important part in the “whole drama” of the situation
63
New cards
Self presentation
Using communication and “performances” to actively manage the impression one’s making on others
64
New cards
Face work
Concerted, purposeful effort on the part of the “actor” to maintain the impression intended by the “self presentation”
65
New cards
The self
This theory asserts that “the self”, in part, is created in interaction with others. You have come to see yourself as others have and do see you
66
New cards
Generalized other
Also known as the “looking glass self”, an abstract, composite perspective of all the messages you have received from “significant others“. Interaction with others create this and it becomes the general perspective of how we come to view ourselves
67
New cards
I
The impulsive, unorganized, undirected, unpredictable, creative part of you
68
New cards
Me
The “generalized other” or the “role self” of me. Is the organized, consistent, and typically predictable patterns of being you share with others. The socially acceptable behavior that provides direction and guidance to your social being
69
New cards
Formal
Being close (or apart) in proximity. Being involved in a shared situation typically pushes people into interaction. This kind of “forced interaction” by way of being in a shared situation, often leads of interaction, through which the parties involved will attempt to search for common ground, which in turn can result in increased identification
70
New cards
Material
The economic statuses of self and others
71
New cards
Idealistic
The ideas, feelings, opinions, beliefs, and experiences of self and others
72
New cards
Theory of identification/division
Three sources of identification/division: formal, material, idealistic. Segregation increased division amongst groups, where integration expands our opportunities to communicate with different people, which in turn, provides an opportunity to find areas of common experiences. Identification and division are a matter of degree, it is never an all or none kind of experience
73
New cards
Elaborated and restricted codes
This theory asserts that the structure of the language employed in everyday life reflects and shapes the assumptions of a social group. The basic assumption is that the relationships established in a social group affect the type of speech used in the group. This happens because different groups have different priorities, and language emerges from what is required to maintain relationships within the group. People learn “their place in the world” by virtue of the language codes they employ. Roles and language go hand in hand. The kinds of roles that children learn are reinforced by the kind of language employed in the community-primarily, the family. The theory focused on two types of codes.
74
New cards
Persuasion
Human connection that is designed to influence others by modifying their belief, values, or attitudes
75
New cards
Requirements to consider something persuasive
Must involve the intent to achieve a goal on the part of the message sender, then communication is the means to achieve that goal, and lastly the message recipient must have free will
76
New cards
Central route of persuasion
The elaborate route. Includes a wealth of information, rational arguments, and evidence to support a particular conclusion. More likely to create long term change, however, not all individuals are capable of receiving these types of messages. Only can succeed when two factors are met: the target must be highly motivated to process the information given and the target must be able to process the message cognitively
77
New cards
Peripheral routes of persuasion
Rely on receiver’s emotional involvement and persuade through more superficial means. Used when motivation or ability is missing from the target audience. Persuaders should focus on quick and easy ways to produce change. Only leads to short term change, if any change at all
78
New cards
Peripheral cues
Authority, commitment, contrast, liking, reciprocity, scarcity, social proof
79
New cards
What are the weakness of the peripheral cues
Emphasizes fleeting emotional responses and are not likely to create long lasting change
80
New cards
How did the theory of “planned behavior” add to the “theory of reasoned action?”
Added a third major predictor. Added that sometimes we might intend to behave a certain way, but our plans are not carried out because we don’t have control over the situation. Added the perceived behavioral control to the theory. Also added the subsets of the perceived behavioral control, self efficacy and controllability
81
New cards
Behavioral intention
Means you plan to act a particular way
82
New cards
Attitude
The sum of beliefs about something
83
New cards
Normative beliefs
Perceptions about what others in your social network expect you to do
84
New cards
Perceived behavioral control
Comprised of two elements: self efficacy and controllability
85
New cards
Self efficacy
An individuals belief that she or he can actually perform the behavior
86
New cards
Controllability
Recognizes that sometimes things are simply out of our control or are at least perceived that way
87
New cards
Inoculation theory
Presenting a weaker form (a small dose) of a contrary argument, much like a vaccine includes a weakened form of a virus. People are more resistant to persuasion when this process takes place than when original beliefs were simply bolstered by stronger evidence
88
New cards
Threat
Necessary component of any inoculation effort, simply involves a forewarning of a potential persuasive attack on beliefs, making sure the target of the persuasive effort is aware of his or her susceptibility to the attack
89
New cards
Refutational preemption
Inoculation message should also anticipate the counter persuasive effort by raising specific challenges and then contesting them
90
New cards
Six types of illocutionary acts
Representatives, questions, directives, expressive, commissive, declarations
91
New cards
Representatives
Utterances designed to fulfill the intention of describing a state of affairs
92
New cards
Questions
Utterances designed to fulfill the intention of eliciting information from the listener
93
New cards
Directives
Utterances designed to fulfill the intention of getting someone to do something
94
New cards
Expressives
Utterances designed to fulfill the intention of describing one’s internal experiences
95
New cards
Commissives
Utterances designed to commit the speaker to something in the future
96
New cards
Declarations
Utterances designed to fulfill the intention of changing the status of an entity