Chapter 8: Experimental Designs - Between-Subjects Design

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/9

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

This set of flashcards covers the key concepts related to between-subjects experimental designs, including definitions, advantages, disadvantages, and the importance of controlling individual differences.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

What is the primary goal of between-subjects design?

To demonstrate a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables.

2
New cards

What does a within-subjects design entail?

Different sets of scores are obtained from the same group of participants.

3
New cards

What are three primary techniques for limiting confounding by individual differences in between-subjects experiments?

Random assignment, matched assignment, and holding variables constant.

4
New cards

Why is individual differences considered a confounding variable in between-subjects designs?

Because groups should be as similar as possible except for the independent variable; differences can affect the outcome.

5
New cards

What is a disadvantage of between-subjects designs?

They require a relatively large number of participants.

6
New cards

How can differential attrition threaten internal validity in between-subjects designs?

If one group experiences significantly more dropout than another, it can create unequal groups.

7
New cards

What is the difference between a two-group design and a multiple-group design?

A two-group design compares two means while a multiple-group design compares means from three or more groups.

8
New cards

What is one advantage of using a between-subjects design?

Each individual's score is independent from all other scores.

9
New cards

What statistical technique is typically used to analyze a two-group mean difference?

Independent-measures t-test.

10
New cards

How can communication between groups be a threat to internal validity?

Participants may share information that could influence the outcomes, leading to confounding effects.