1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
What are interest groups?
A formal organization representing the stated interests of a segment of the polity
Primary goal is to influence public policy
Why are interest groups different from political parties?
Unlike political parties, interest groups may not be interested in the financial alone
Why do interest groups form?
Disturbance model
Pluralist model
Elitism model
Collective-action model
Disturbance model
Interest groups form when their interest is “disturbed”/threatened
Implication → existing groups won’t abuse power, for fear that latent groups will form
Pluralist model
Interest groups emerge organically whenever multiple groups, classes, or ideologies exist
Implication → overlapping memberships will limit the scope of group demands, no permanent winner or losers
Elitism model
Well-structured, resourceful interests will organize
Implication → “the flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly chorus sings w/ a strong upper-class accent”
Collective-action model
Narrow, concentrated interests will organize; groups w/ broad membership will struggle to come together
Implication →policy-makers will deliver concentrated benefits and socialize the costs
What kind of interest groups will be formed under each model?
Disturbance?
The disturbed
Pluralist?
Everybody!
Elitism
The 1%! The upper-class! The wealthy!
Collective-action?
Specific groups (Farmers, tech giants, etc.)
What are some routes for achieving influence for interest groups?
Interest groups can try to influence the selection of officeholders
Broad-based, more poorly resourced groups
Interest groups can try to influence the decisions of officeholders
More specific, well-resourced groups
What are the different strategies for influencing selection and decision-making?
Inside strategy
Provide technical, informative, and political intel
Outsider strategy
Mobilize voters/key constituencies; use as leverage w/ candidates and office holders (no direct access necessary)
Astroturf strategy
Feign public activism on issue to pressure candidates + officeholders
Litigation strategy
Sue!
If lobbying doesn’t buy votes, what does it get you?
Lobbying doesn’t really persuade, but buys participation
Lobbying makes it cheaper for lawmakers to intervene on issues important to lobbyists and the lawmaker (“legislative subsidy”
Lobbying is more successful on issues that are in the electorate’s blindspot
Does money buy elections?
Better-funded challengers are more likely to beat incumbents
But, incumbent expenditures do not affect vote share
What should we make of these findings?
High-quality candidates receive more money
They’re good at fundraising!
High-quality candidates receive more votes