1/43
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Strategic Offensive Principles (4)
Focusing on building competitive advantage and converting it to sustainable competitive advantage
Applying resources where rivals are weakest
Doing what rivals won’t expect
Acting fast with impact
How to Competitively Attack a Rival Firm (4)
Avoid challenging competitor where they are strongest
Use firms strengths to attack competitors weakness
Understand results may not occur immediately
Be prepared for counter-response
Offensive Strategy Options (7)
Offering equal or better product at lower price
Being first to make next gen product
Pursuing continuous product innovation
Creating new markets
Adopting/improving ideas of rivals
Launching preemptive strike
Using guerrilla marketing tactics
Best Targets for Offensive Attacks (4)
Market leaders in vulnerable position
Challenging firms who’s weaknesses are your strengths
Struggling firms
Small firms
Purposes of Defensive Strategy (3)
Lower firms risk of being attacked
Weaken impact of attack if occurs
Redirects focus to other rivals
Forms of Defensive Strategy (2)
Actions that block challengers
Actions that signal likelihood of strong retaliation
Ways to Block Attack From Competitors (7)
Introduce new features and close any gaps
Maintain economy pricing
Discourage buyers from trying competitors
Make early announcements to induce buyers to postpone switching
Offer special features to reduce attractiveness of switching
Challenge quality/safety of products
Give discounts or better terms to intermediaries
Ways of Signalling Retaliation (4)
Public announcements of commitment to maintaining market share
Publicly committing to matching terms and prices of competitors
Keep large amount of cash
Making strong counter response
First Mover
First company to introduce product/service to market
First Mover Advantages (8)
Brand Recognition
Intellectual Property Protection
Quick Market Share
Economies of Scale
Strategic Resources
Exclusive Relationships
Customer Lock in
Price Premium
Conditions that lead to First Mover Advantage (6)
Pioneering builds brand loyalty
High Switching Costs
Property Rights Protection hinders imitation
Enables scale economies
First mover sets industry standard
Strong Network Effects
First Mover Disadvantages (6)
High Costs
Late Movers Can Learn From Mistakes
Replication
Regulatory Hurdles
Market Readiness Risk
Consumer Resistance
Conditions That Lead to First Mover Disadvantages (6)
Pioneering is more costly than imitating
Product doesn't live up to expectations
Rapid Market Evolution
High Market Uncertainty
Customer Loyalty is Low
High Investment Fees
Scope of the Firm (4)
Activities Performed Internally
Product Breadth
Geographic Market Presence
Size of Competitive Footprint
Horizontal Scope
Range of Product/Service segments firm serves within market
Vertical Scope
Extent to which firm controls different stages of production and distribution process
Merger
Combining two or more firms into a single entity, often taking on new name
Acquisition
When one firm, the acquirer, purchases and absorbs the operations of another firm, the acquired
Objectives of Mergers & Acquisitions (5)
Creating more cost-efficient operation
Expanding geographic coverage
Extending into new product categories
Gaining quick access to new resources and capabilities
Leading the convergence of industries
Strategic Issues With Mergers & Acquisitions (2)
Cost savings are smaller than expected
Gains in competitive capabilities take longer to realize
Organizational Issues With Mergers & Acquisitions (3)
Culture Clash
Key employees at acquired firm are lost
Managers make mistakes
Vertically Integrated Firm
Participates in multiple segments of industry’s overall value chain
Vertical Integration Strategy
Can expand firms range of activities backwards into its sources of supply or forward towards end users of its product
Types of Vertical Integration Strategies
Full Integration
Partial Integration
Tapered Integration
Full Integration
Firm participates in all stages of vertical activity chain
Partial Integration
Firm builds positions only in selected stages of the vertical chain
Tapered Integration
Firm uses a mix of in house and outsourced activity in any stage of vertical chain
Benefits of Vertical Integration (3)
Add to firms technological capabilities
Strengthens competitive position
Boosts firms profitability
How is Integrating Backwards Profitable
Achieving same scale economies of scale
Matching or beating suppliers production efficiency
Reasons For Integrating Backwards
Reduction in supplier power
Reduction in costs of major inputs
Protection of proprietary rights
Assurance of the supply and flow of critical inputs
Reasons for Integrating Forwards (5)
Lower costs
Increase bargaining power
Gain better access to end users
Strengthen brand awareness
Increase differentiation
Disadvantages of Vertical Intefgration Strategy (6)
More Risk
Slow acceptance of tech
Less Flexibility
Doesn’t create economies of scale
Capacity matching issues
New capability requirements
When Should You Outsource Activities (5)
Performance is better and cheaper
Not crucial to achieving sustainable competitive advantage
Increases Flexibility
Reduces Risk
Allows concentration on core activities
Risk of Outsourcing (2)
Loss of control
Doesn't meet needs
Strategic Alliance
Agreement between 2 or more separate firms to work together to achieve common goal
Joint Venture
Partnership involving establishment of independent corporate entity
Factors that Make Alliance Strategic (7)
Achieves bushiness objectives
Builds competitive advantage
Remedies competitive weakness
Defends threat
Increases bargaining power
Creates market opportunities
Speeds development
Benefits of Strategic Alliance (5)
Minimizes problems with vertical integration
Extends scope of operations
Reduces need of independence
Increased Flexibility
Useful when industry is rapidly evolving
How Are Strategic Alliances Advantageous (4)
Improves supply chain efficiency
Creates economies of scale
Provides new market access
Increases capabilities of firm
Succesful Strategic Alliance Factors (5)
Picking good partner
Sensitive to cultural differences
Alliance must benefit both sides
Both parties keep promise
Adjusting agreement over time
Factors Influencing Longevity of Alliance
Partners that aren’t direct competitors
Establish permanent trust
Continuing to collaborate in mutual interest
Drawbacks of Strategic Alliance
Culture Clash
Gains not being realized
Risk of being dependent on partner
Protection of knowledge from rivals who are partners
Why Strategic Alliance is More Advantageous Than Vertical Integration or M&A
Lower investment cost and risk
More flexible
Rapidly deployed
How to ensure Strategic Alliances Work
Create system for managing alliance
Build trust
Set up safeguards
Make commitments to partners
Make shared learning a routine