Control, demand characteristics and investigator effects

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

12 Terms

1
New cards

control measures

random allocation, counterbalancing, randomisation and standardisation

2
New cards

extraneous variables

any variable other than the IV that may affect the DV and therefore the results. Essentially nuisance variables that do not vary systematically with the IV (random)

3
New cards

confounding variables

EVs that vary systematically with the IV so cannot tell if the change in DV is due to IV or CV (not random)

4
New cards

Types of extraneous variables

situational variables and participant variables

5
New cards

situational variables

variables connected with the research situation

e.g. temp, time of day, lighting etc

controlled using standardisation

6
New cards

participant variables

variables connected with the research participants

e.g. age, intelligence, gender etc

controlled through the experimental design or random allocation

7
New cards

random allocation

randomly allocating participants to their groups

decreases participant variables

8
New cards

counterbalancing

combats order effects

split the sample in half, with 1 completing the 2 conditions in one order and the other completing it in the reverse order. Order effects should be balanced out

9
New cards

randomisation

trials are presented in random order to control the effects of bias

10
New cards

standardisation

all situational variables are kept identical - easy to replicate

the same formalised procedures and instructions for all participants

11
New cards

demand characteristics

can act as a confounding variable

cue from the researcher or research situation that may be interpreted by participants as revealing the purpose of the study, maybe leading participants to change their behaviour

Please-U effect = purposely tries to support the hypothesis

Screw-U effect = deliberately goes against the hypothesis

controlled by single-blind experiments - only researcher knows the true aims

participant reactivity

12
New cards

investigator effects

researcher acts in a way to support their prediction (conscious or unconscious)

controlled using a double-blind experiment in which both the researcher and participants are not aware

leading questions