Social Influences ( Term 3 )

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/33

flashcard set

Earn XP

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

34 Terms

1
New cards

Social Influence Theory

People are heavily influenced by the thoughts and actions of others.

2
New cards

Compliance

The influence of a person or group on an individual through the use of rewards or punishments.

3
New cards

Identification

The influence of a person or group on an individual through the process of identifying with them.

4
New cards

Internalization

The influence of a person or group on an individual through the process of accepting their attitudes, values, or behaviors as their own.

5
New cards

Pro-social Behavior

Behavior that benefits other people and society in general.

6
New cards

Nature vs

Socio-biology views pro-social behavior as genetic (Nature) while Nurture suggests it is learned during the socialization process.

7
New cards

Decision-stage model of helping

Model of situational influences on bystander intervention.

8
New cards

Reciprocity Principle

The belief that if someone does something for you, you should do something for them.

9
New cards

Social Responsibility Norm

The belief that people have a social responsibility to help those in need.

10
New cards

Personal Characteristics

Past experiences and immediate circumstances that influence a person's pro-social behavior.

11
New cards

Empathy

Our emotional response to a person's distress.

12
New cards

Mood

A low-intensity, long-lasting emotional state that influences pro-social behavior.

13
New cards

Competence

Our capacity to successfully complete a task, influencing our willingness to help others.

14
New cards

Altruism

Helping others without seeking personal gain, often at great personal cost.

15
New cards

Anti-social Behavior

Selfish behavior negatively valued by society, causing harm to others.

16
New cards

Diffusion of Responsibility

The diminished sense of personal responsibility in groups.

17
New cards

Bystander Effect

People failing to offer help in emergencies when others are present.

18
New cards

Audience Inhibition

Reluctance to help in the presence of others due to fear of making a social blunder.

19
New cards

Social Influence

Behavior influenced by observing others or pressure from them.

20
New cards

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Calculating gains vs. losses when deciding to help.

21
New cards

Obedience

Changing behavior due to influence from an authority figure.

22
New cards

Conformity

Changing behavior to match group norms.

23
New cards

Normative Influence

Conforming to fit in a group due to fear of rejection.

24
New cards

Informational Influence

Conforming because the group is respected and believed to have more knowledge.

25
New cards

Culture

Societal emphasis affecting conformity levels.

26
New cards

Group Size

Larger groups exerting more significant social pressure to conform.

27
New cards

Deindividuation

Loss of personal identification leading to increased conformity.

28
New cards

Social Loafing

Exerting less effort in a group setting compared to working alone.

29
New cards

Unanimity

Strengthening conformity when everyone agrees on a viewpoint or action.

30
New cards

Results of Study

Showed 36% antisocial, 19% nonnormative, 36% neutral, and 9% prosocial responses, with criminal acts being most frequent.

31
New cards

Conformity in Asch's Study

Participants conformed ~1/3 of the time when actors unanimously gave the wrong answer; 75% conformed at least once, dropping when a 'real' participant dissented or answers were private.

32
New cards

Factors Influencing Conformity

Asch's study identified factors like majority size and presence of a dissenter affecting conformity levels.

33
New cards

Informational Influence Model

Asch's study helped develop theories like this model to explain conformity in groups.

34
New cards

Limitations of Asch's Study

Not representative sample, lacks external validity, influenced by 1950s USA's conservative and conformity values.