1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
a. Adaptive evolution and behavior
proximate (immediate) causes of behavior vs ultimate (fitness, natural selection) causes of behavior
evolutionary stable strategies: a strategy can’t be out competed by another strategy
ex: prey has to be fast to escape predators
b. Categories of animal behavior
social behaviors: communication, competition, cooperation
reproductive behaviors: mating, courtship, taking care of young
defensive behaviors: avoiding predators
foraging behaviors: locating, consuming, and digesting food
Foraging decisions in heterogenous environments
where to forage?
what types of food to forage?
how long to forage?
Currency of foraging theory
Fitness: number of offsprings
energy gain rate: calories or amount of food per unit time
more energy = more offspring
want max fitness
Definition of optimal foraging theory
animals should make foraging decisions based on costs and benefits of feeding in particular environmental situations
How animals respond to variation in food over space and time
1. Central place foraging
2. Risk-sensitive foraging
3. Optimal diet composition
4. Diet mixing
1. Central place foraging
food is brought to a central place (ex: nest);
once starting foraging in an area, the number of prey caught caught decelerates over time
2. Risk-sensitive foraging
foraging behavior that’s influenced by presence of predators
a. Ecology of fear
fear of predation changes prey behavior and morphology over generations;
need to have just right amount of fear to be able to survive, have higher fitness, and produce more offspring
3. Optimal diet composition
animals consume many different food items
a. max ratio of energy gain to handling time
a. Maximize ratio of energy gain to handling time
prey animals vary in size
benefit of large prey= more energy
cost of large prey= higher handling time amount of time that a predator takes to consume prey)
4. Diet mixing
different foods have different nutrients
a single food is not optimal for all nutrients
foragers often need to eat a mix of different foods
limiting nutrients
Marginal value theorem
when an animal must spend time to forage b/w multiple different patches, the theorem states:
a forager should leave a patch when the rate of energy gain from that patch becomes equal to the average rate of energy across all of the patches in the environment
Marginal value theorem Assumptions
foragers don’t need to worry about risks (predators)
everything that the forager eats is the same (no variation in energy from the food, all prey items are equally easy to get)
all foods are equally nutritious
the rate of energy acquired from a patch decreases over time
if patches have different amounts of resources, then “good” and “bad” patches are distributed randomly (and homogeneously) thru out the landscape
Giving up time
the amount of time spent in the patch before the forager decides to leave and move onto a new patch
giving up density
the food density in a patch when the animal moves onto a new patch
Interpretation of energy gain over time plots
Patch separation distance (travel time)
if patches are further apart= stay longer because want to take advantage of patch before going long distance
Patch quality
higher patch quality= longer forager should stay because want to take advantage of patch before going long distance
low quality= leave sooner