Business Law - Chapter 3: Tort law Part 1 - The intentional torts

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/42

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

43 Terms

1
New cards

What do torts deal with?

Results of the actions or omissions of another person (the tortfeasor/defendant)

2
New cards

Intentional torts

The person who caused the injury or harm intended to do

e.g. Assault, battery, defamation, and false imprisonment

3
New cards

Unintentional torts

When the person who caused the injury or harm did not intend to do so, but was still careless in their actions

e.g. Negligence, strict liability

4
New cards

Liability

When someone is legally responsible for losses suffered

5
New cards

Direct liability

A situation where an individual or organization is held liable for their own actions

e.g. If a driver causes a car crash due to their own negligence

6
New cards

Vicarious liability

A situation where an individual or organization is held liable for the actions of another person

e.g. If a delivery driver for a company causes an accident while on the job, the employer may be held vicariously liable for damages

7
New cards

The two requirements for establishing vicarious liability

  1. There must be a relationship of employment between the employer and the employee, and

  2. The employee must have committed the tortious act within the scope of their employment. I.e. the act must have been committed in the course of the employee’s work duties or be otherwise closely related to acting on the employer’s behalf

8
New cards

Battery

When the plaintiff typically experiences actual unwanted physical contact as a result of the actions of the defendant

9
New cards

Legal Test for Battery

  1. There was intentional physical contact.

  2. The contact was non-trivial; and

  3. The contact was offensive (meaning that the victim did not consent).

10
New cards

Assault (tort)

Protects individuals from gestures or words that cause fear of physical harm, even if no physical contact is made.

11
New cards

Legal test for assault

  1. The tortfeasor created an intentional apprehension in the victim.

  2. the tortfeasor threatened imminent contact; and

  3. The contact threatened was offensive (meaning that the victim did not consent).

12
New cards

Intentional infliction of mental suffering/emotional distress

Seeking damages for severe emotional distress caused by the defendant’s intentional or reckless conduct

13
New cards

Legal test for intentional infliction of mental suffering/emotional distress

  1. The tortfeasor’s conduct was flagrant and outrageous;

  2. the tortfeasor’s conduct was calculated to cause harm; and

  3. The tortfeasor’s conduct resulted in a visible and provable illness or injury.

14
New cards

False imprisonment

When the defendant intentionally restricts the plaintiff’s freedom of movement through the restriction of physical freedom or threat or psychological pressure

e.g.When a person is wrongfully detained by the police or when a store employee wrongly accuses a shopper of shoplifting and detains them

15
New cards

Legal test for false imprisonment

  1. The plaintiff was totally deprived of his or her liberty;

  2. The deprivation was against the plaintiff’s will; and

  3. The deprivation was directly caused by the defendant

16
New cards

The guidelines for citizen’s arrest

Empowers any person to arrest another person whom they reasonably believe has committed a criminal offence if they witnessed a crime being committed or reasonably believed one was just committed

17
New cards

Malicious prosecution

When a person initiates a criminal legal proceeding against another person on malicious grounds

18
New cards

Legal test for malicious prosecution

  1. initiated by the defendant;

  2. terminated in favour of the plaintiff;

  3. undertaken without reasonable and probable cause; and

  4. motivated by malice or a primary purpose other than that of carrying the law into effect.

19
New cards

Statutory Tort of Invasion of Privacy

(1) It is a tort, actionable without proof of damage, for a person, wilfully and without a claim of right, to violate the privacy of another.

(2) The nature and degree of privacy to which a person is entitled in a situation or in relation to a matter is that which is reasonable in the circumstances, giving due regard to the lawful interests of others.

20
New cards

Statutory Tort of Invasion of Privacy (con’t)

(3) In determining whether the act or conduct of a person is a violation of another’s privacy, regard must be given to the nature, incidence and occasion of the act or conduct and to any domestic or other relationship between the parties.

(4) Without limiting subsections (1) to (3), privacy may be violated by eavesdropping or surveillance, whether or not accomplished by trespass.

21
New cards

Legal test for invasion of privacy in BC

  1. The defendant wilfully invaded the privacy of the plaintiff; and

  2. The plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the circumstances.

22
New cards

Trespass to Land

When an individual enters onto or remains on someone else’s land without consent or lawful authority

e.g. Sneaking onto private land, staying on someone’s property after being asked to leave, blocking someone’s driveway

23
New cards

Legal test for trespass to land

  1. The defendant entered onto the plaintiff’s land; and

  2. There was no lawful justification for the entering of the land.

24
New cards

Nuisance

Any unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of someone’s property; its purpose is to protect an individual’s right to exclusive possession and control over their land

25
New cards

Legal test for nuisance

  1. The defendant interfered with the plaintiff’s use and enjoyment of land; and

  2. The interference was unreasonable

26
New cards

The 4 factors for determining unreasonable interference

  1. character of the neighbourhood in question;

  2. the severity of the interference;

  3. the utility of the defendant’s conduct; and

  4. the sensitivity of the plaintiff

27
New cards

Examples of a nuisance claim

  • excessive or loud noise;

  • smoke drifting onto the neighbour’s property (cigarettes, vaping, burning leaves, etc);

  • pets coming onto neighbour’s property;

  • trees, bushes, roots, growing onto neighbour’s property; or

  • neglected or unkept property drawing animals

28
New cards

Chattel torts

A group of torts that deal with the unauthorized or wrongful use of another’s personal property

e.g. Furniture, vehicles, electronic devices, clothing, and other personal objects

29
New cards

Conversion

When someone intentionally or negligently interferes with another person’s right to possession of their chattel

e.g. If someone takes another person’s car without their permission and uses it for their own purposes

30
New cards

Trespass to chattles

When someone intentionally interferes with another person’s right to possession of their chattel, but without actually taking possession of it

e.g. If someone intentionally damages another person’s computer without taking it, they would be committing trespass to chattels

31
New cards

Detinue

When someone is in lawful possession of another person’s chattel, but refuses to return it when the rightful owner demands it

e.g. If a person borrows another person’s lawn mower and refuses to return it

32
New cards

Replevin

Related to detinue and it is a legal action to recover personal property that is wrongfully taken or detained

33
New cards

Defamation

Provides a legal remedy to individuals who have suffered harm to their reputation

34
New cards

Libel

Written defamation

35
New cards

Slander

Spoken defamation

36
New cards

The legal test for defamation

  1. The statement was defamatory.

  2. The statement referred to the plaintiff; and

  3. The statement was published by the defendant to at least one other person

37
New cards

Civil conspiracy

A legal cause of action that allows individuals to seek damages when two or more parties conspire to commit an unlawful act resulting in harm

38
New cards

Legal test for civil conspiracy

  1. The defendants must act in combination, that is, in concert, by agreement or with a common design;

  2. Each of the defendant’s conduct must be unlawful and in furtherance of the conspiracy;

  3. The defendants’ acts must be directed towards the plaintiff;
    The defendants should have known that in the circumstances injury to the plaintiff would likely result; and

  4. Each defendant’s conduct causes injury to the plaintiff.

39
New cards

Intimidation

When one person threatens to cause injury or loss to another person in order to influence their actions or decisions

e.g. Physical threats, threats to one’s reputation, threats to one’s economic well-being

40
New cards

Legal test for intimidation

  1. coercion of another to do or refrain from doing an act;

  2. the use of a threat as a means of compulsion;

  3. the threat must be to use unlawful means

41
New cards

Legal test for intimidation (con’t)

  1. the person threatened must comply with the demand.

  2. intention to injure the person threatened; and

  3. The person threatened must suffer damage

42
New cards

Inducing breach of conduct

When one person intentionally persuades another to breach a contract with a third party

43
New cards

Legal test for inducing breach of contract

  1. the existence of a contract;

  2. the defendant was or can be assumed to have been aware of the existence of the contract;

  3. the defendant intended to cause the breach;

  4. the defendant caused or induced a breach; and

  5. the plaintiff suffered damage as a result.