criminal law chapter 4: inchoate crimes

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

12 Terms

1
New cards

inchoate crimes

unfinished, incomplete

traditionally misdeamenors

2
New cards

three types of inchoate crimes

attempt, conspiracy, solicitation

3
New cards

rules of inchoate crimes

cannot be charged with choate and inchoate offense

should be a lesser penalty than choate

there is specific intent, mens rea

some substantial step is required in completing the crime, not penalizing evil thoughts

4
New cards

#1 attempt

specific intent: must act purposefully, cannot be done recklessly

overt act toward commission: must be a substantial step towards completion

failure to consummate the crime: why did it fail?

  • legal or factual impossibility

example: tennesse vs. reeves: girls putting rat posion in teachers drink, took a substantial step by having purse on desk with posion in it,

5
New cards

#2 conspiracy

“agreement”, favorite tool of prosecutors, use it as a vice

actus reas: proof of an agreement necessary, although some states require overt act in futherance of criminal goal

mens rea: specific intent to attain a particular criminal objective on the part of at least one person in the partnership, specific intent to agree, more likely with two or more people

6
New cards

unilateral vs. bilateral

unilateral: in a group of conspirators, there is at least one individual with criminal intent

bilateral: at least two guilty persons are required

7
New cards

chain conspriracy

each person in the conspiracy handles the commodity at different points in the process, linear connection,

drug example

8
New cards

wheel conspiracy

hardcore group of participants handle most of the transactions and there are spokes (hub and spokes)

if there is a common purpose: 1 conspiracy

think ferris wheel, donald trump example

9
New cards

issues of conspiracy

close proximity to punishing “evil thoughts”

longer the conspiracy lasts, more critical it is, greater chance of successful prosecution

what if there is several crimes?

10
New cards

pinkerton rule

a conspirator is held liable if:

  • crime that is the object of the conspiracy

  • any other forseeable crimes commited by their co-conspirators in furtherance of the conspiracy

11
New cards

defenses to conspiracy

reunuciation: “abandonment” requires the actor to “:thawrt the success of the conspiracy

withdrawl: similar to abandonment but not the same, not required too seek to defeat the conspiracy

impossibility: legal vs factual

*best thing you can do is snitch

12
New cards

#3 solicitation

one person requests or encourages another to perform a criminal act, under common law, can be tricky because of free speech rights

mens rea: specific intent to encourage another to commit a crime

actus reas: words that contain some inducement

example: matthew hale: religious leader who sent people to protest outside of judges house