1/45
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
UN Emergency Force
In 1956, to facilitate the disengagement of British, French, and Israeli troops from Egypt following the Suez Crisis, a multilateral armed force dispatched to help keep the peace until a political settlement could be reached
Act as buffer → keep both sides from each other
Egypt requests UNEF withdrawal in May 1967
Controversial: Egypt called to remove these troops → attacked later
History of UN
Created in June 1945
Original membership 51 states (now 193)
Primary mandate, as espoused in UN Charter, is maintaining international peace and security
Security Council pre-eminent organ responsible for maintaining international order
UN: security council
5 permanent members (P5) w/ veto rights
Until 1965 six rotating members
After 1965 ten rotating members
For a resolution to pass, at least nine votes for and no P5 votes against
UN Charter: article 2(4)
"All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations"
UN Charter: article 2(4) problem
Prohibition against the use of force does not cover all situations
Sovereign states can use force within their territory
Some theorists believe a state may be able to use force outside its territory, e.g. force used for humanitarian purposes or to protect citizens of the intervening state who are living abroad
However, the UN Charter does not acknowledge these situations as exceptions to the prohibition against the use of force
UN Charter: article 51
"Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security."
Exceptions to article 51
Self-defense must be necessary and proportionate to the aggression
When a state faces an imminent attack, it may have a right to act in anticipatory self-defense
Article 51 and other provisions of the UN Charter do not address this situation
However, customary international law recognizes the right of anticipatory self-defense when an armed attack is imminent and inevitable
How can you be sure that they are going to attack??
→ what proof do you have?
→ other reasons to build up forces than getting ready to attack
Security Council powers
Chapter VI (Pacific Settlement of Disputes)
Security Council authorized to call disputing parties to resolve their conflict through peaceful means such as fact-finding, good offices, negotiation, arbitration and judicial settlement
Chapter VII (Action with Respect to Threats to the Peace, Breaches of the Peace, and Acts of Aggression)
Grants Council coercive authority - it can compel compliance with decisions binding on member states
It may impose diplomatic and economic sanctions and authorize military force
Chapter VIII (Regional Arrangements)
Do chapter 7 but give it to someone else to deal with
Encourages regional organizations to engage in peaceful dispute settlement and requires Council's authorization before taking coercive action
Grants Council power to delegate enforcement to regional bodies
UN Charter: Article 42
The Security Council ….. "may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations"
What are peace operations?
Range from small observation and monitoring missions to peacebuilding in conflict-afflicted societies
Original role of peacekeepers was to serve as buffer forces and observers
Usually small-scale under Chapter VI
Some exceptions occur under Chapter VII: e.g. use of force authorized in Korean War, 20k strong peacekeeping force in Congo/Katanga
What was the first UN peacekeeping mission?
United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (Arab-Israeli war)
United Nations Truce Supervision Organization
Created in 1948 to monitor the ceasefires after the first Arab-Israeli war
Unarmed military observers
Still there today
Still monitors ceasefire agreements in Lebanon, Golan Heights, Sinai
what was the first large scale UN authorized mission?
Korean War
→ purpose: repel N Korean forces after they had invaded S Korea
Still exists today
Peacekeeping Principles
UN-mandated missions
Consent of parties
Impartiality
Voluntary troops contributions
Minimum use of force
only self-defense
Cold War peacekeeping Examples
Includes:
UN Emergency Force (Sinai)
UN Observation Group in Lebanon
UN Operation in the Congo
UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus
UN India-Pakistan Observation
Mission
UN Interim Force in Lebanon
Cold War peacekeeping
Fall of Soviet Union, they withdraw from different places, UN takes up this place
UN invokes Chapter VII authorizing military force (US-led coalition) to remove Iraqi
troops from Kuwait
UNPROFOR in Bosnia is UN's largest peacekeeping mission
New missions in Afghanistan, Cambodia, Angola, Namibia, El Salvador and Nicaragua
then to Bosnia, Somalia, Rwanda, Kosovo, Haiti, Democratic Republic of Congo, etc.
Shift from peacekeeping to peace
enforcement
Second generation peacekeeping includes electoral assistance, human rights monitoring
Peacekeeping evolution
1992: peace-enforcement units called to established to deal with challenges that exceeded peacekeeping→ never created
Organizations like NATO called upon in these situations → provide protection for UN peacekeepers
By 2010 ~10,000 uniformed personnel in the field
Peacekeeping operations have more and more been undertaken by regional organizations (ex. African Union)
Peacemaking
Measures to address conflicts in progress and usually involves diplomatic action to bring hostile parties to a negotiated settlement
Involves negotiation, mediation, and democratic decision-making processes
Uses mutual dialogue to achieve fair agreement about how to solve the immediate problem, thereby removing the parties' incentives to use violence
Peacekeeping
Refers to the deployment of national or, more commonly, multinational forces for the purpose of helping to control and resolve an actual or potential armed conflict between or within states
Peacekeeping forces are normally deployed with the consent of the parties to a conflict and in support of a ceasefire
Usually unarmed or only lightly armed
Does not right wrongs or address the conflicts causing the violence
Peace enforcement
Refers to the use of military assets to enforce a peace against the will of the parties to a conflict when, for instance, a ceasefire has failed
Peace enforcement often exceeds the capacity of peacekeeping forces and is thus better executed by more heavily armed forces
Peace building
Measures targeted to reduce the risk of relapsing into conflict by strengthening national capacities for conflict management and to lay foundation for sustainable peace and development
Transformation of social relations - repairing the systemic factors that were causing and exacerbating harmful conflict
What are other actions the UN can take other than force?
Economic sanctions and international criminal prosecution
Peacekeeping origins
League of Nations brought in to resolve territorial dispute between Colombia and Peru, 1933-34
The League appointed three member nations (Guatemala, Ireland and Spain) as a 'Commission for the Administration of the Territory of Leticia'
Each side's military forces were withdrawn and an internationalized force of Colombian troops under the Commission's supervision policed the disputed area
Weakness of League of Nations
Intended to prevent states from going to war, the final sanction was the threat of force
Ultimate authority rested on the mobilization of world opinion
Belief that the threat of economic sanctions, alone, would be sufficient to deter states from aggression
Sanctions worked during ww1, so thought was that they would in future cases as well
Article 16 reflected the experience of WWI when the blockade weapon had been used to good effect
LoN peacekeeping example: Abyssinia (Ethiopia)
Following 1935 Italian invasion, limited sanctions were imposed
Not applied by all member nations and did not include some key products such as oil
The League made no attempt to limit Italy's ability to wage war, such as closing the Suez Canal to Italian shipping
Sanctions were dropped following the Italian conquest of Abyssinia in 1936
Leads to widespread belief that League of Nations unwilling or unable to use collective force to prevent conflicts
UN Peacekeeping and the Decline of war
There is no question that the UN played an important role in helping to shut down some deadly conflicts over the past six decades
BUT ...
UN deals with consequences of war, not onset of war
Hard for peacekeeping to explain the long-term downward trend in war given its relatively recent invention
While peacekeeping has been shown to be effective at preventing the resumption of specifi vars. its effects on the overall level of war in the world are not straightforwar
Consent of parties means peacekeeping "works" when it is not needed and "fails" when it is needed most
Prospective availability of peacekeeping to maintain peace once achieved probably allows some wars to end that would otherwise last longer
Did the UN promote peace during the Cold War?
UN did not have a significant effect on relations between the superpowers
UN was virtually powerless when it tried to push a policy that one of the superpowers opposed
It did serve as a convenient forum for seeking international legitimacy, third party mediation, and dealing with issues the superpowers were mainly indifferent to or had a common interest in resolving
The UN after the Cold War
Some successes but also many failures
NATO did not initially have UN support in 1999 when it went to war with Serbia over Kosovo
When the US could not get the UN's permission to invade Iraq in March 2003, it simply ignored the UN
But after Saddam Hussein overthrown, UN becomes involved in post-war reconstruction (UNSCR 1483)
UN unable to check Russian aggression against Ukraine in 2014/2022
Right to Protect
Calls for initiating wars against countries that commit serious crimes against their own civilian populations
Goes well beyond peacekeeping and can only be implemented under UN
auspices
If the major powers get serious about this doctrine, there should surely be a significant increase in the number of wars fought in the future
However, R2P is not likely to gain much traction, simply because it will be difficult to get the Security Council to sanction R2P operations, as occurred with Chinese and Russian opposition to intervention in Syria
Srebrenica
Town designated a safe area by UN and protected by Dutch peacekeepers
Dutch forces were under-supplied, under-equipped and superiors at the UN were unwilling to give it additional support
July 1995, Dutch forces confronted by advancing Bosnia Serb army
Massacre of 8,000 Bosnian Muslim men and boys by Bosnian Serb forces
Ethnic cleansing of 20k civilians
Worst instance of mass murder since WWII
In July 2014 a Dutch court found the Dutch government liable for deaths of more than 300 Bosnian Muslims
Rwanda
UN Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) created in 1993 with mandate to oversee peace agreement ending civil war
Following renewal of violence in April 1994, UN reduces its military presence
With onset of genocide, UN Commander Dallaire requests reinforcements but is unsuccessful
Uses limited forces to protect as many civilians as possible
Reinforcements eventually arrive in June but only after 800,000 Tutsis murdered
Rise and fall of peacekeeping missions
Until 2016 number of UN operations increases with 117k personnel deployed on 16
operations
Thereafter it begins to fall
Operations in Liberia, Haiti and Darfur end
Budget cuts
Security Council gridlock
UN peacekeeping missions have steadily reduced in number and size
Only several remaining (Central African Republic, South Sudan/Abyei region, Western Sahara)
June 2023: military junta in Mali request withdrawal of UN mission (MINUSMA)
Deployed in Mali since 2013
Coincides with request to end French military mission and invitation to Wagner Group
Democratic Republic of Congo terminates UN mission (MONUSCO)
UN troops deployed in Congo for two decades
UN peacekeeping today
11 missions
Top 10 contributions of troops and why
Bangladesh
Nepal
India
Rwanda
Ethiopia
Pakistan
Egypt
Indonesia
Ghana
China
One reason they do this is monetary —> get paid to contribute troops
Female peacekeeping
Shift from all-male peacekeeping units to greater temale participation, including all-emale police units
Focus on protecting vomen in post-conflict societies
By 2020, 1/3 of peace operations personnel were women
Scandals
Rape
War crimes
Very rarely do the people get punished for the crimes they commit
African-led peacekeeping
Increasing shift from UN to African-led operations → African Union
Reflects decreased UN legitimacy and preference for regional peacekeepers
Since 2000, 38 African-led peace support operations
Ten active operations as of 2023
other organizations that lead peacekeeping missions
NATO
EUFOR (operation Althea)
Russian
Who can be an honest broker if UN is involved in the conflict?
→ created the neutral nations supervisory commission in order to do this
Ukraine war: Elements of ceasefire deal
Ceasefire agreement
Agree on ceasefire line
Creation of Joint Military Coordination Commission
Agreement on a buffer zone and limitation zones for heavy weapons
International monitoring and verification mission (to include European troops?)
Humanitarian demining
Humanitarian corridors
Security guarantees
Build on ceasefire to achieve political settlement
Ukraine war: preconditions for ceasefire
For Ukraine - legally binding security assurances?
Confidence-building measures/de-escalation
No attacks on port infrastructure
No attacks on civilian ships in the Black Sea
No attacks on other critical infrastructure, e.g. energy installations
No targeting of Ukrainian airports
Ceasefire line
Line of Contact or basis for a demilitarized zone?
Demilitarized zone implies a long-term de facto division of the country
Line of Contact considered more of a transitional arrangement
Buffer zone or zone of separation
Approximate 10-15 km wide would be absent of military forces, heavy and light weapons, as well as being a no-fly zone for UAVs - except those of international monitors
Wider buffer zone
50km for artillery of 100mm calibre or more
75km for multiple rocket launchers
150km for certain missile systems
Must be verifiable
Separate agreement needed for maritime security
Ukraine war: International monitoring and verification
Requires a clear mandate and assumption of a ceasefire
Length of ceasefire line probably 1200 km (5x length of Korean DMZ) - need to patrol 24/7
Probably an international mission rather than a UN one
Core tasks include monitor ceasefire and to verify withdrawal of troops and heavy weapons
Large force interposing itself between Russian/Ukrainian forces unlikely (50k troops)
Lighter force located on both sides of ceasefire line limited to monitoring and verification (15k troops)
International force equipped with armored vehicles, helicopters, light aircraft, UAVs
Led by Force Commander reporting to UN Security Council
Composition of force agreed to by both sides?
UN Force - blue berets?
Will Russia accept troops from NATO countries, incl. NATO minus America?
Which countries are willing/able to send troops and viewed as impartial?
Global South?
If only civilian force, will either side have confidence in it?
Indefinite commitment
Ukraine war: military component
Monitor implementation of ceasefire/report violations
Verify withdrawal of heavy weapons
Support de-mining
Enable humanitarian corridors
Ukraine war: civilian component
Monitor/report on human rights violations
Provide humanitarian assistance with a focus on marginalized and vulnerable groups including the elderly, women, your and children
Provide medical/psychological assistance to population (e.g. helping with
PTSD)
Ukraine war: security guarantee
Ukraine will want guarantees it will receive military (direct/indirect) and other support if Russia resumes aggression
What type of deterrent will be sufficient?
European troops stationed in Ukraine (tripwire force)
European troops stationed near Ukraine ready to intervene quickly?
European patrolled No Fly Zone?
More weapons - higher quality
New/renewed sanctions on Russia for ceasefire violations?
What will Russia demand?
No NATO troops in Ukraine?