1/44
- differentiate between conceptual and operational constructs - apply operationalism to concrete examples - compare and contrast experimental, quasi-experimental and non-experimental research designs
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
the research process (6)
finding a research topic and buillding rationale
generating research question
develop hypothesis
design research study
analyse the data
drawing conclusions and reporting results
what do we need to do when designing a research study (3)
identiify and define variables
research design (experimental vs quasi-experimental vs non-experimenta;l)
identify the population (sampling)
what is a conceptualising construct
something hypothetical / abstract concept e.g. motivation, aggressiveness, depression etc
what is operationalisation (3)
turning a construct into an operational variable
something we can objectively measure
helps others to replicate our study / findings
visualisation of construct to measure
construct —-operationalisation—→ measure
when we operationalise a construct, we are creating measured variables
an example of operationalisation
happiness ——operationalisation—→ physiological (hormones, neurotransmitters), behavioural, other-report (family/friends), self-report
when do we do operationalisation
beginning of each project
what does operationalisation require
a decision on precise definitions to be able to quantify - subjective
what can different operationalisations lead to
different conclusions e.g. if RQ whther background music affects task performance
example of how operationalisation can be subjective (3)
operationalise task performance as accuracy - positive
operationalise task performance as speed - negative
operationalise bg music - type/volume
what are quasi-experiments
provide some evidence for cause-and-effect
what are conditions of quasi-experiments (3)
manip of independant variable
no comparison/control group or not random assignment to conditions/groups
little to no control over extraneous variables
what are experiments
explain cause-and-effect relationships
conditions of experiments (3)
manip of independant variable
random assignment to conditions/groups
control over extraneous variables
what do true experiements include
control groups
what are non-experiments
establish association between variables
conditions of non-experiments (3)
no manip of independant variable
no random assignment to conditions/groups
little to no control to over extraneous variables
what are within-subkects design
re[peated measures design
all ppts are exposed to all levels of independant variable
whatis between-subject design
independant designs
different ppts are exposed to different levels of independant variable
positives of within-subject (3)
max control of extraneous ppt variables
more powerful as noise in data is reduced
smaller N
negatives of within-subject (2)
not practical with all designs
carryover effects (background factors, repeating the same thing so they know what to expect) → solution is counterbalancing
positive of between-subject (4)
no carryover effects
independant scores
less time per ppt
practical with designs where it is not possible for ppts to be in more than one condition
negative of between-subject
needs larger N
what is complete counterbalancing
equal number of ppts complete each possible order of conditions e.g. 3 note-taking conditions (laptops, tablet, pen and paper)
what is the problem with counterbalancing
might not be possible with large number of conditions (view table)
what is the solution to counterbalancing
latin square
what is the latin square
each condition appears exactly once in each position
what is the goal of latin squares
ensure that each condition has an equal chance of being experienced first, second, last or by different ppts, this is efficient
what are correlational designs for non-experimental designs
associations/ relationships between variables
correlational design =/ statistical correlation
can include continuous and/or categorical variables
how can we study change over time (3)
cross-sectional
longitudinal
cross-sequential
what is cross-sectional
data collected at one point in time that compares two or more pre-existing groups of people
what is longitudinal
one group of ppl are followed oevr time as they age
what is cross-sequential
combo of longitudinal and cross-sectional elements with different cohorts observed across time
positive of cross-sectional (2)
efficient for large samples
time and vost effective
negative of cross-sectional (3)
causality
vulnerable to cohort effects
misses dynamics over time
what does cross-sequential monitor
individuals of different ages across a short period of time
3 types of quasi-experimental research
one group post-test-only design
one group pretest-posttest design
non-equivalent pretest-posttest design
why is one-group post-test-only design the weakest form of quasi-experimental design (2)
no baseline
no comparison group
positive of one-group posttest-only design (2)
quick to implement
good as pilot study/initial exploration
what is one-group pretest-posttest design
dependent variable is measured before and after treatment
negatievs of one-group pretest-postest design (3)
practice effects
potential history effects
regression to the mean
positives of one-group pretest- post-test design (2)
quick to implement
each [erspn os theit own baseline
what is non-equivalent pretest-posttest design
a quasi-experimental design that compares two existing, intact groups that are not formed through random assignment
positives of non-equivalent pretest-posttest design (5)
more info than one-group designs
pretest allows baseline comparison
practical and feasible
ethically easier
some causal evidence
negatives of non-equivalent pretest-posttest design (3)
no random assignment possibke
baseline differences
regression to the mean