1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Free will
The notion that humans can make choices and their bvr / thoughts are not determined by biological or external
Maslow and rogers felt it self actualised we are in control of our lives
Bvr is unconstrained - causes are present but we are able to reject them
Voluntary bvr
Determinism
The view that all bvr is shaped or controlled by internal or external forces rather than an individuals will to do something.
all bvr is governed by internal or external factors
Identifiable causes, future bvr is predictable
Hard determinism
The view that all bvr is caused by something ( internal and external factors) so free will is an illusion
All bvr is predictable no free will, out of our control
Soft determinism
The view that bvr may be predictable but there is also room for personal choice from a limited range of possibilities
Bvr is governed to an extent but in absense of force/coercion we have a degree of choice
Constrained but not controlled
Biological determinism
The belief that bvr is caused by biological influences that we cannot control
Comes down to genes, brain structure and neurotransmitter/hormone levels
Environmental determinism
The belief that bvr is caused by features of the environment that we cannot control
Determined by our past experiences / external forces
Through classical and operant conditioning skinner argued free will is an illusion and that we are the sum of our reinforcement history
Psychic determinism
The belief that bvr is caused by unconscious psychodynamic conflicts that we cannot control Comes
Originates in unconscious conflicts
Bvr is determined by innate, biological drives (EG: sexual and aggressive instincts) and early childhood experiences
Determinism is socially sensitive
Cause for free will
Determinism is basically sentive argument. The hard determinist stance goes against the way our legal system operates
In court offenders are held morally accountable for their actions. There have been attempts in criminal cases in US for murderers to claim their bvr was determined by inherited aggressive tendencies.
The better isn’t position is therefore undesirable in allowing individuals to ‘excuse’ their behaviour.
Also approaches which support the idea of psychic and environmental determinism has been accused of taking responsibility away from the individual and placing blame with parents who may in turn feel the weight of responsibility
Free will can have a positive influence on mental health
The case for free will
Acknowledging the importance of free will can have a positive influence on mental health
People with a high internal LOC tend to have a higher degree of mental health
Robert’s et al found adults with a strong belief in fatalism were at greater risk of depression
Overall this suggests thinking ew have free will has a positive effect on bvr
Consistent with the aims of science
The case from determinism
Determinism explanations are consistent 9th the aims of science
The value of such research is in allowing us to predict human bvr
On the other hand free will is a non physical phenomenon which is difficult to quantify and measure
This is at odds with the scientific nature of psychology. The existence of free will is more about belief than evidence
There are always individual differences - not all humans are predictable