Compare & Contrast: Stalin & Castro

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

Legal Methods #1

Compare: both parties established single-party states → dismantled existing political structures & centralized all authority

  • Stalin: utilized the principle of “democratic centralism” → demanded absolute obedience from all party members to top leadership

  • Castro: centralized power in the Office of Revolutionary Plans & coordination (ORPC) & the National Institute of Agrarian Reform (INRA) → bypassed the formal cabinet & was answerable only to him

2
New cards

Legal Methods #2

  • Stalin: exploited his role as General Secretary to fill Party with personal loyalists → to ensure rivals were outnumbered in votes

  • Castro: (1961) merged revolutionary factions (e.g PSP & DR) to form PCP → became sole legal party & controlled media, youth groups & education

3
New cards

Legal Methods #3

  • Stalin: enforced a ban on factionalism (established by Lenin in 1921) → effectively banned free speech & criticism

  • Castro: reformed judiciary & police immediately after revolution, replaced old system w/ new framework of “revolutionary justice”

4
New cards

Use of Force #1

Contrast: Stalin’s methods were characterized by “total terror” & mass purges, whereas Castro’s use of force was more selective & often used exile

  • Stalin: Great Terror (1936-1939) involved systemic purges of military, party & general population → resulted in millions of deaths

  • Castro: conducted televised trials & executions of Batista loyalists & anti-revolutionaries to discourage counter-revolution

5
New cards

Use of Force #2

  • Stalin: created Gulag system → network of forced labour camps used to isolate & punish anyone deemd a threat to the revolution

  • Castro: purged high-ranking internal dissenters (e.g, imprisonment of Huber Matos for opposing communist influence)

6
New cards

Use of Force #3

Stalin: show trials of former Bolshevik colleagues (Kamenev, Zinoviev) → accused were publicly shamed & executed as “enemies of the state”

Castro: utilized “exoduses” (Mariel Boatlift) to maintain power by allowing political opponents & malcontents to leave the country for the U.S.

7
New cards

Charisma & Propaganda #1

Compare: both leaders created a cult of personality that elevated the leader to an infallible, quasi-divine status to bind people to the state

Stalin: portrayed as the “Red Tsar” & the only legitmiate heir to Lenin, appearing as a “fearless political leader” in all state imagery

Castro: cultivated the image of the “Maximo Lider” whose qualities & oratory were seen as the driving force of the revolution

Robert Service: fusion of Stalin w/ Lenin legitimized authority through powerful ideological justification across Paty & broader society

8
New cards

Charisma & Propaganda #2

Stalin: promoted the idea of “engineers of the soul” → artists & writers were required to produce work that glorified his leadership & the Party’s goals

Castro: positioned himself as the symbolic reincarnation of José Martí, the “Apostle of Cuban Independence”, to ground his image in Cuban nationalism

Fitzpatrick: cult blurred lines between individual & state, core feature of Stalinism

9
New cards

Charisma & Propaganda #3

Stalin: word became law → so powerful & increasingly detached from reality, → subordinates fed his ego

Castro: legendary oratory skills and marathon speeches (4-5 hrs long) to speak directly to the masses → bypassed traditional political channels

Jan Plamper (post-revisionist): The sacralization of Stalin filled the void left by the collapse of traditional religion → offered a secular object of devotion

10
New cards

Dissemination of Propaganda #1

Compare: both leaders used state-controlled media & youth organizations to disseminate ideology & ensure total conformity to revolutionary values

Stalin: enforced “Socialist Realism” in all arts → required all creative expression to serve Party’s industrial and social goals

Castro: launched a massive literacy campaign(1961) → used young volunteers to teach rural power & indoctrinate them with socialist tenets

11
New cards

Dissemination of Propaganda #2

Stalin: used the “Short Course” & state-run outlets to curate a particular image of “faultless leader” to the world

Castro: established Radio Rebelde & used state-run newspapers to promote revolutionary success & highlight social programs

12
New cards

Dissemination of Propaganda #3

Stalin: targed youth for indoctrination → ensured younger generation knew he was “a great benefactor for all people”

Castro: carefully stage-manage media (e.g. 1957 Herbert Matthews Interview) to curate illusion of revolution being larger & more powerful than it was

13
New cards

Foreign Policy #1

Contrast: Stalin’s foreign policy moved toward isolationist survival & regional buffer zones, while Castro was aggressively internationalist with exporting revolution

Stalin: “Socialism in 1 country” → prioritized survival of Soviet state over immediate export of global revolution

Castro: actively exported revolution by sending military & medical aid to revolutionary movements (i.e. Angola, Bolivia, & Ethiopia)

14
New cards

Foreign Policy #2

Stalin: Stalin established a buffer of satellite states after WWII to protect USSR from future invasions

Castro: sought to disable US hegemony in America → positoned Cuba as a defiant country to US political & economic dominance

Revisionist View: Bay of Pigs invasion → reflected US imperial overreach & arrogance

15
New cards

Foreign Policy #3

Stalin: signed the Nazi-Soviet pact (1939) as opportunistic move to delay conflict & gain territory in Poland & Baltic States

Castro: after US trade embargo, aligned Cuba economically & militarily w/ USSR → became dependent on Soviet subsidies for national survival