lesson 24

right to privacy

Griswold v Connecticut

right to privacy

Griswold v Connecticut

specific guarantees in the bill of rights extend from those guarantees that help give them life and substance

impact of Griswold v Connecticut

replaces Lochner's right to liberty of contract as an unenumerated right worthy of constitutional protection

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)

facts

1879 Connecticut law banned use of birth control, even among married couples

- Griswold, Planned Parenthood Director and Dr. Lee from Yale arranged the test

Girswold v. Connecticut (1965)

holding

court struck down the law on the ground it violated the right to marital privacy

world bf Roe

1970s how many states allowed abortion when a women’s health was in danger

how many states prohibited abortion at all stages of pregancy

danger: 14 states + dc

all stages: 30 states

Roe v Wade (1973)

law

texas prohibited abortion except when necessary to save mother’s life

• roe couldn’t get an abortion

Roe v Wade (1973)

question presented

does the constitution recognized the right of a woman to terminate her pregnancy by abortion

Roe v Wade (1973)

holding

constitution creates a right to privacy that encompasses a woman’s fundamental right to terminate her pregnancy

the women’s right to privacy (from Griswold) trumps the state’s police powers

• whether it found in the 14th or 9th is board enough to encompass a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy

Roe v Wade (1973)

holding - 3 semester framework

1. first trimester: state may not regulate

2. second trimester: state may regulate to safeguard women’s health

(during the first 2 trimester the decision is largely left up to the parents, and the doctor)

3. third trimester: state’s interest in preserving the life of an unborn is compelling, states may limit or ban

what 2 general strategies did Congress purse in their attempt to limit Roe

“right to life“ amendments

• congress enacted 30 laws restricting the availability of abortions

  • congress barred the use of funds for programs in which abortions is included as a method of family planning

who is pushing for the anti-abortion legislation

catholics and evangelicals uniting to form pro-family coalitions

abortion and presidential elections

issue of presidential politics

1980s to 2010s, continues today

abortion and judicial nominations

become more contentious

when Justice Scalia dies in 2016

• republican controlled Senate refused to hold any nominations

  • Trump ran w/ pro-life justices campaigning

Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992)

challenged law

abortion providers challenged Pennsylvania abortion restrictions that require

• doctors to tell women about fetal development to gain “informed consent“

• 24 hr waiting period

• minors to obtain consent of parent or judge

• married women to notify her husband w/ limited exceptions

Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992)

question presented

did the appellate court err in upholding all provisions except spousal consent?

Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992)

Troika

Scouter, O’Connor, Kennedy join together to co-write an opinion, upholds most of the restrictions in the law under O’Conner’s “undue burden“ test

• Stevens and Blackmun join their opinion

Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992)

holding (5/4)

reaffirmed Roe’s central holding (right to abortion) but replaced the 3 trimester formatting

1. BF viability (around 20 weeks) women can obtain an abortion w/out “undue interference from the state“

2. AF viability State can restriction abortions as long as there is an exception for health/safety of the women

3. state has legitimate interest in protecting the health of women and life of the fetus

Roe → Casey changes

right to abortion is no longer considered “fundamental right“ of pregnancy

is now a “liberty interest to chose to terminate or continue her pregnancy bf viability“

they rely on the right to liberty under the 14th amendment

Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992)

Scalia dissent

question if this is a liberty protected by the Constitution of the US

• the constitution says nothing about it

• the longstanding traditions of American society have permitted it to be outlawed

why did Kennedy O’Connor and Scouter given in Casey for not overruling Roe

they didn’t want the court to be seen as a “naked-power organ“ a political institution who decisions are simply overturned on the personnel changes on the court

how many states asked the court to overturn Roe and Casey in Dobbs

26 states

Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health (2022)

facts, law challenged

Mississippi banned most abortions after 15 wks

Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health (2022)

question presented

do all pre-viability bans on elective abortions violated the consitution

Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health (2022)

tea about the question

forced the hand of the court to rule on Casey/Roe

• 80 amicus briefs for Miss

• 50 amicus briefs for Jackson

Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health (2022)

majority opinion

1. Abortion as moral issue that Americans disagree, Roe removed abortion from political process by finding Constitution protected a women’s right to choose, Roe/Casey are overruled

2. the constitution does not protect abortion

   1. not enumerated

   2. not an unenumerated right bc it is not deeply rooted w/ our nation’s history/tradition (Washington v Glucksberg)

3. stare decisis does not require upholding Roe / Casey

4. legitimacy

Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health (2022)

majority - standard from Washington v Glucksberg

rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution must be deeply rooted in the nation’s traditions and history

• not an issue until late 20C, entirely unknown from American Law

must be implicit to the concept of ordered liberty

Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health (2022)

majority- why stare decisis does not apply

Roe is an abuse of judicial authority, wrong from the start, reasoning is weak and damaging

• has created enflamed debate and deepening division

Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health (2022)

dissent (Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan)- constitutional interested that were protected by Casey and Roe

substantive liberty interest

promoted equality

Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health (2022)

dissent- Casey reaffirmed Roe

first stages of pregnancy the women has the right to choose, the gov can not control a women’s body or the course of her life, determining her future

Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health (2022)

dissent- what other rights could losing their constitutional protection now

bodily integrity, familial relationships, procreations

Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health (2022)

dissent- stare decisis

requires SC to uphold roe/casey

women have relied on the availability of abortion both in structuring their relationships and planning their lives

reaction to dobbs from the white house

biden signs bill to protect same-sex marriage and interracial marriages

reaction to dobbs the public

unfinished opinion was leaked: lead to protest at the court, people outside of justices’ homes, large outcry from the public

reaction of dobbs midterm elections

affect how people vote and some unexpected swings in states